It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
^^
Lucky Bum !!
Can you even read the print at 2000x1000?
hmmm..
So is the T-98 better than the T-90M ??
Because the Indians have that (Arjun is inferior to that)
Although any Indo-China conflict will be mostly partrooper/aircraft oriented..no tanks..
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Indeed.. and in this case the Terrain is not like Iraq where the better radar wins type of thing.. its hilly/mountainous
"crack troops"..??
[edit on 28-3-2005 by Daedalus3]
Originally posted by rapier28
No idea.
We could assume the the Russian T-90's are better because they got better crew + experience.
the T-98 is more important for China in that it's an Chinese design drawing on Russian influences instead of a Chinese design on a Russian Chasiss.
I don't even think it's going to built in great numbers, it's apparantly only going to be supplied to the crack troops.
Elite troops.
China has several elite troops and quick-response teams. It is cutting down it's military size and mechanizing it's infantry.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Elite troops.
China has several elite troops and quick-response teams. It is cutting down it's military size and mechanizing it's infantry.
They wouldn't be anything like the “Elite” Republican guard now, would they?
Originally posted by Odium
O.K. how well can the ‘Type 98 Main Battle Tank’ do against the worlds leading tanks? Abrams, etc.
What are its strong points, weak points, etc.
I can’t find much information on it, other then it is meant to be a copy/more advanced copy, of the ‘Leopard 2 A6’ but I only have basic knowledge of tanks. If a war with India started, would these tanks be able to hold their own against anything India can throw at them? (Excluding air.)
Originally posted by Vanguard
Much like most modern Chinese and Russia technology - unproven thus impossible to comment. All posts are pure speculation.
Its far from the transparent nature of US failures - we learn from our mistakes rather than hide them.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Protecting the ammunition form exploding is old tech and its not even that hard to do. In 91 the U.S. had already implemented a heavy armed door that closed after you received the ammunition, so it would not be affected by any round.