It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -e11even-

page: 291
131
<< 288  289  290    292  293  294 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman


Q

Wow, looks like everyone is very nervous over the recent drops.

I assume Supreme Court justice 1 would be Chief Justice John Roberts. Any ideas as to who #2 would be?

queenofswords: Fascinating that the Dems are dreading declassification so much that they're willing to concede Kavenaugh's confirmation to avoid it. It must be something that completely destroys any shreds of legitimacy the Russia investigation still has.




posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

queenofswords: Fascinating that the Dems are dreading declassification so much that they're willing to concede Kavenaugh's confirmation to avoid it. It must be something that completely destroys any shreds of legitimacy the Russia investigation still has.


Good thing we'll get both the nomination and the declass.

No deals!




posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


#2 is Clarence Thomas, according to last night's discussion.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:09 AM
link   
Good Morning All


Well, I'd say the 17th really delivered and was a Glorious Day !
We still have work to do and need to remain vigilant, but seeing the "Plan" unfold is comforting.

I tried to watch the Emmy's last night to see what clues I could possibly glean, lol, but I fell asleep after about an hour.

A few things I did notice that were sorta interesting.

1. Very low key set design and low, almost self deprecating energy in general.

2. Little to no real mention of Trump or politics, under tone of " jokes " was that they had somehow been " told " to not grandstand.

3. Uncomfortable racial " jokes "

4. BIG Focus on the Emmy Statue itself ? Esoteric meaning being given a nod ? ( note blinking dots behind hosts ? )




www.youtube.com...

5. Lot's of black, white and red attire, check out RuPaul's ( masonic ) outfit and bright red shoes ?






edit on 18-9-2018 by MountainLaurel because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:13 AM
link   
This morning Adam Schiff is joining the "he's unfit, so let's impeach him!" crowd.


During an interview on CNN, Schiff, D-Calif., expounded upon a statement he released Monday, saying it was FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who issued a warning about national security.

"This is what the director of the FBI, the Republican appointed director of the FBI, Christopher Way, has told us in terms of this being a red line and it should be treated at the Gang of Eight level," Schiff said during an appearance on CNN, referring to the bipartisan group of congressional leaders who are briefed on intelligence matters.
www.washingtonexaminer.com...

Unfortunately for Schiff, Waters, and the others, CONGRESS formally requested these de-classifications... on TWO occassions since June.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Sabrechucker

That makes a lot of sense Sabre.

When I get a mo I'll review whether any previous strings of titled posts provide similar.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Dbl
edit on 18-9-2018 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:45 AM
link   
So does anyone who have a better law knowledge can tell me why Trump can't declassify ALL documents related to the FISA warrant? Is it going to conflict with an on-going investigation or something?

I'm seeing the left questioning this, and as I'm pretty sure they're just trying to stop the declass because they're gone be screwed, I want to know as well why only release a few of them.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
So does anyone who have a better law knowledge can tell me why Trump can't declassify ALL documents related to the FISA warrant? Is it going to conflict with an on-going investigation or something?

I'm seeing the left questioning this, and as I'm pretty sure they're just trying to stop the declass because they're gone be screwed, I want to know as well why only release a few of them.


Vin,

He can declass anything he wants. In fact, so can congress on the house floor without committing a crime. In this case he has been very careful to appear not only not involved, but to disapprove of the entire process.

This has put the onus on congress, correctly I might add per law. So they asked for some declass. My guess, the declass with texts and nunez's release will raise more questions then it answers, demanding full release.

The key here is most figured he'd never declass, the fact that he has now freaks them out, especially those who do not know what it really says.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
So does anyone who have a better law knowledge can tell me why Trump can't declassify ALL documents related to the FISA warrant? Is it going to conflict with an on-going investigation or something?

I'm seeing the left questioning this, and as I'm pretty sure they're just trying to stop the declass because they're gone be screwed, I want to know as well why only release a few of them.


If you listen to some people, yes, it will interfere with a rather large ongoing investigation - the Russia investigation into President Trump. In reality it is going to blow the entire investigation out of the water.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:53 AM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Or maybe especially those who DO know what it says....



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

I've been cherry-picking over there for a long time. I guess I haven't noticed until now.

So I'm a moron. Sue me.




posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


#2 is Clarence Thomas, according to last night's discussion.


And now ..... all-of-a-sudden !!

A BC News Chief Political Analyst Matthew Dowd Alleges Clarence Thomas Is a ‘Sexual Predator’



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 10:56 AM
link   
Cool! Thanks you both for your answers.




posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 11:01 AM
link   
a reply to: MountainLaurel

I didn't watch the Emmys. Thanks for the short video. That skit was more than odd. It was uncomfortably stupid and banal. I feel like I'm missing something, but then again, probably not. Maybe the writer wanted to highlight just how dumb these people tend to be. (not all)



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

I'm not watching the NFL. I'm not buying Nike.

I could care less about Hollywood and all the scumbags who live and work there. I'm content to watch all the classic stuff and there is loads of it. Rarely do I watch something new. They are throwing absolute garbage at us. Although there is a Willem Dafoe film coming out on van Gogh.

I only watch the Oscar's long enough to see the In Memoriam.

I'm voting against all the slime by boycotting and withholding financial support.

We the People outnumber Hollywood. We should use that to our advantage.



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Like clockwork! The FNMedia have their marching orders and M.Dowd is a good little soldier.

[BRIDGE: FAKE NEWS MEDIA]

Expect more. Everytime one of the soldiers of FNM shoots a "bullet" of fake news or innuendo, a patriot needs to fire back with the truth. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!


edit on 18-9-2018 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   
I'm just going to drop this thought in this thread for reference. It may or may not have significance, but I want to document it mainly because I have long thought JC sends "coded" messages through his graphics and tweets. Q even said as much when he "decoded" the one about Andrew McCabe.

I posted about J ames__C omey's tweet yesterday with the picture of him standing under the Mount Rushmore carvings. Those are the rock sculptures of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln...in that order left to right.

JC was standing under the sculpture of Lincoln in his tweet facing forward toward the camera. (JC tends to post many pics of himself in rear view or profile view.)

Yesterday, while giving a speech at the Justice Department’s Forum on Free Speech in Higher Education, Rod Rosenstein mentioned three out of the four men in Comey's picture: Jefferson, Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt (in that order).

RR's Speech


edit on 18-9-2018 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-9-2018 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 11:43 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Your Decodes are next level accurate in some cases. I think, going back to the early days of mirrors and learn our comms some are hidden in plain sight



posted on Sep, 18 2018 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Also we know what happened to Lincoln



new topics

top topics



 
131
<< 288  289  290    292  293  294 >>

log in

join