It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


John Brennan personally green-lit the 9/11 hijackers entry into the US

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 28 2018 @ 07:52 AM

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
Dude, I don't think that it's as good as the Onion. Anyone citing it as a source isn't really familiar with them.

Agreed, I was just being facetious. The site is pure garbage and the only people who will agree with it are looking for bias confirmation.

posted on Aug, 28 2018 @ 11:24 AM

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Tempter

It's nonsense like this, being the reason we can't seem to get the hell away from irresponsible news cycles. For Christ sake check the damn facts first, then check your sources.

Most of all, stop being a part of the problem and be a part of the solution.

Any thoughts on what a solution might be in this case?

Well that depends.

Some people are looking for ways to support their own personal agendas and become blind to seeking out facts, which is wholly different than making an error or simply being uninformed.

If one is not looking for confirmation of their own bias, and they run across an item that seems to hand them a well wrapped package of something they may suspect...then BE suspicious...for instance, if you suspect that a story may be a little over the top research it's foundings, who owns it, are the owners typically always anti or pro some position then look into other sources.

The real problem (especially with conspiracy theorists) is that historically in the past the mainstream would not give the time of day OR for other reasons it was not feasible to release insider information to the mainstream so instead they used private sourcing channels...and whomever NOW would like to foster an agenda of throwing that same community into a tailspin of disinformation can easily do so simply by using private channels. As an example if Joe Blows News outlet was the original source for Edward Snowdens findings on the NSA which became mainstream knowledge, now every conspiracy theorist in the world is going to believe EVERY SINGLE WORD coming out of Joe Blows News outlet and use the Snowden case as an example of why they can be trusted to provide valuable information.

posted on Aug, 30 2018 @ 02:13 PM
a reply to: alphabetaone

That's an interesting statement you make, but it does not quite seem to be a solution to any particular problem.

Indeed, nobody has even defined a problem have they? On this thread.

OP says thus and so, others have chimed in, so what is the problem? Maybe learning to separate propaganda and spin from factual statements?

Was Brennan working there then, and did he sign off on certain visas?

Personally, I don't care because the vast preponderance of other facts surrounding 911 works against the official story. As far as I'm concerned, "the hijackers" were just names in a glorious story. No planes were hijacked that day. Maybe Atta hung around South Florida and visited Hoffman Aviation and snorted coc aine with hookers. Bernie Kerik turned in Atta's passport and somebody left a rental car with incriminating material in Maine, but that does not mean any airliners were hijacked that day.

posted on Jan, 5 2019 @ 01:01 AM
It was discovered this week that Obama's Director of the CIA (John Brennan) and Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper), Hacked and Spied on FISA Judge Reggie Walton...and Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Roberts.

Brennan and Clapper are placing the blame on their former boss, President Barack Obama.


new topics

top topics
<< 1  2   >>

log in