It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
Power units don't sit 50 feet away from the aircraft. They're maybe 10 feet away at their farthest. You can't move the power unit too far away from the aircraft and still have the power cable reach it.
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
So, Zaph, straight up, what do YOU think? B-2, B-21, RQ-180, or?
originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
none of them are connected in those pics, is it possible that a apu could have had unnecessarily long cable? sure but why would they in the picture in question.
chris p moore • a day ago
The comparison to the Essex apu would only work if they we're in the same plane of alignment which they are not. It's obvious it is some distance closer to the shooter. The aircraft is back and at an angle.
originally posted by: Drunkenparrot
He has a point, however would the APU cart sitting say 50 feet closer to the observer in the foreground account for the roughly 30% variance between the size calculations of the object in the photo and the known wingspan and height B-2?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
Power units don't sit 50 feet away from the aircraft. They're maybe 10 feet away at their farthest. You can't move the power unit too far away from the aircraft and still have the power cable reach it.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
Fine, just for you and for accuracy, power units that are IN USE don't sit 50 feet in front of aircraft. Sorry for not being exact in my wording, apparently I have to be from now on.
originally posted by: Sammamishman
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
Lets explore the math for a moment. Please bear in mind, I am not a mathematician and I could be completely off base here but if the GPU was sitting right under the wing of the aircraft the distance to the GPU would have been 56,165.52 ft (10.64 miles), assuming the aircraft was centered in the apron....
....Even if the aircraft wasn't centered in the apron and pushed closer to the blast deflector, it still wouldn't be enough variance in the calculations to get close to 172 ft.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
Power unit aside what's your opinion on the odd cockpit area and the leading edge just directly below it that doesn't seem like a b2 at all.
Then what about the engine cowlings are we really sure those are cowlings at all. There's enough there to make me wonder if they're not something else.