News U.S. Nuclear Weapon is a GAME CHANGER According to our Military Strategists.

a reply to: carewemust

They despise each other to the extreme over Kashmir, the land of endless death.

originally posted by: hillbilly4rent
a reply to: carewemust

I'm not hoping for any, but I know they will be. With all the agreements maid between countries to help defend one another, all it would take for example. Pakistan bombing India how is that going to work. India is a close friend and Ally of sorts of the US. Pakistan is a not so close Ally but friends with Russia. So it's anybody's ball game.

Actually you have that mixed up. Pakistan is America’s ally, India allied themselves to Russia to country. That particular mess is all messed up.

Camain

a reply to: camain

Yeah I had to check my facts about that. I don't keep up much with that part of the world. Your right, 👍

a reply to: hillbilly4rent

I hear ya, it makes absolutely no sense at all. so we have an ally that helped NK build nukes, but because they fight terrorism.....while funding other terrorists and provide a safe haven for our terrorist allies, ya, there our ally.... Makes sense right? LOL, best thing we can do is just stay away and let them figure it out.

Camain

originally posted by: hillbilly4rent
a reply to: carewemust

They despise each other to the extreme over Kashmir, the land of endless death.

Re: en.wikipedia.org...

I don't suppose India/Pakistan/China are willing to divide it into 3 sections, with each country owning a third?

a reply to: SaturnFX

How many ways do we need to blow up the world?

That's not important.

It's how many times we can do so that is important.

a reply to: gort51

Nothing Wrong with a Bigger , Better " Big Stick " . Deterrence Keeps the Peace........

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Yeah. The world is a peaceful place.

Ain't it?

Seems that what we got has been working.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: gort51

Nothing Wrong with a Bigger , Better " Big Stick " . Deterrence Keeps the Peace........

What was more effective in forcing North Korea to stop threatening its neighbors with rhetoric, missile launches and nuclear tests? Military Deterrence, or Economic Sanctions?

a reply to: Phage

We are Still Here Mr. Bootae.....)

Well, that's terrifying.
Yay America, I guess?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: gort51

Nothing Wrong with a Bigger , Better " Big Stick " . Deterrence Keeps the Peace........

What was more effective in forcing North Korea to stop threatening its neighbors with rhetoric, missile launches and nuclear tests? Military Deterrence, or Economic Sanctions?

I would say Both .

nuke, nuke, nuke, yes, I admit, cool strategic made-to- order nuke could be a temporary hold, and ...we? gotta hold the upper hand if possible, the warrior part of me likes it, But breaks what is left of my heart and sense of humanity to accept that we are still going in this direction. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(What%27s_So_Funny_%27Bout)_Peace,_Love,_a nd_Understanding

How many dollars can we set ablaze at once!?

Awesome game and what a time to be alive!

This is a "no safe place" on or under the earth weapon. Enemies can rest assured that there's no bunkers or safe place for them, IF there is war.

It's a game changer indeed. No one survives!

originally posted by: gort51
Oh How wonderful...

A new Atomic bomb......just what the World needs....

I'll ask the plants and animals in nature what they think about it, next time I'm among nature.....I'm sure they will be thrilled.

The nuclear warhead is not new. The delivery system is an upgrade , though .
So this "A new Atomic bomb" is a false statement .

originally posted by: hillbilly4rent
Great back to the arms race again. The Russians test their new Satan-2 now we have one even smarter.

The Satan - 2 is a missile delivery system. The OP is on a guided gravity bomb

a reply to: Gothmog

The nuclear warhead is not new. The delivery system is an upgrade , though . So this "A new Atomic bomb" is a false statement .

Which part of a bomb is the system.

originally posted by: SaturnFX
How many ways do we need to blow up the world?

Anyhow, game changer? currently the game is don't use a effin nuke.
Anything that changes that game, I don't want part of regardless of what side "wins"

Blowing up the world is an impossibility.
At least for now. Maybe a few hundred years from now....?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Gothmog

The nuclear warhead is not new. The delivery system is an upgrade , though . So this "A new Atomic bomb" is a false statement .

Which part of a bomb is the system.

Lets see .
The casing
The delivery system
The weapon ( which is meant for conventional explosives as all gravity bombs are)

And you really dont want to debate that one with me....