It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sessions hits Trump back: Won’t be ‘improperly influenced’

page: 3
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Voting for a candidate does not mean you trust them, no, but defending them non-stop for years on end does at the very least imply that you trust them. "Trust the plan" right? Sounds like there are plenty of people "trusting the plan" Trump has supposedly concocted in the White House basement. If "Q" is to be believed that is.
edit on 8/23/2018 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Kharron

You are cut from the cloth of the MSM....

“The impeachment”
“The Pence administration”

Making up things in your head, wishing upon a shooting star, misinformation and I’m sure you stand by it.

Sure, could be tongue in cheek but I get the feeling you think you know way more than you actually do.

On the topic of Sessions - he’s the invisible man, likes it that way and obviously doesn’t like being thrust into the light. I for one think he needs more light shed on him so people can understand what the hell he actually does and has been doing for the last two years.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 05:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kharron


So you agree with me? Hillary is not an excuse, Trump was a choice.


You had three choices... Hillary could be the reason for your choice for Trump...So yes, not an excuse, but a reason...
To even suggest an excuse would mean one is trying to explain why Hillary forced them to make a wrong choice, but the problem is Trump wasn't the wrong choice.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Voting for a candidate does not mean you trust them, no, but defending them non-stop for years on end does at the very least imply that you trust them. "Trust the plan" right? Sounds like there are plenty of people "trusting the plan" Trump has supposedly concocted in the White House basement. If "Q" is to be believed that is.


One would not need to defend if there wasn't a never ending attack that started about 30 seconds after he hit 270 votes. I feel like we are arguing over what came first the chicken or the egg here.

If everyone would just shut up and let the cards fall where they may without bias we would all be better for it.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: CADpro

While the courts and the FBI has the scared old man going.
Up all night, can't sleep, worried. Desperate.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Why do people hate him?



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Kharron

He's being loyal.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Since Manafort was found guilty and Cohen has plead guilty, and the state of N.Y. is going after the trump foundation

Mueller has the drive and his goals so don't you sorry your pretty little head about it. .
The crazy old man is #ting bricks tonight.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Sure that's it... Except he ran against John McCain in 08 and then Mitt Romney in 12.

What else are you wrong about?



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 06:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Trueman

Voting for a candidate does not mean you trust them, no, but defending them non-stop for years on end does at the very least imply that you trust them. "Trust the plan" right? Sounds like there are plenty of people "trusting the plan" Trump has supposedly concocted in the White House basement. If "Q" is to be believed that is.


Supporting him is more like keeping him because that's all you got and there is nothing better.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Kharron

He's being loyal.


Well the FBI and intelligence agencies had moles and fake supporters in the campaign So theres a good chance sessions was one such person. He should had said he was gonna recuse before being hired. Trump should had fired him day one.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 08:46 PM
link   
I hate both of them, but at least Sessions bowing to Trump's every whim like almost every other Republican.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: CB328
I hate both of them, but at least Sessions bowing to Trump's every whim like almost every other Republican.


When a mouse like sessions has the president backing down, you know the old man is snake bit.



posted on Aug, 23 2018 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

So you are saying that you "settled"' for Trump and he's not really as great as some seem to believe around here? That's a really low bar you seem to have set for yourself.

Usually politicians should be held to better standards in order to earn your support, but I guess Trump is "meh at least he's not Hilary" for you?



posted on Aug, 24 2018 @ 05:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Kharron

He probably spoke out now, because Trumps position is looking shakier by comparison, than it did early in his Presidency. With even some of the most foam mouthed supporters Trump ever had, looking back on the election with a fleck of doubt in their gaze, Sessions probably feels that he is in a better position to publicly defend himself from those sorts of comments than he used to be. Whether he knows something we do not, only time will tell, but its interesting to see this change of position from him, from absorbing the flak, to actively defending himself from it.

One way or another, a change in his stance, means a change in something else. What that may be however, is a question which is going to have a complicated answer. Yes, the President is not in the same bullish position (although you wouldn't know that from his commentary on social media and in the press) as he was, but that would not normally be enough on its own to make Sessions speak out. Unless something has moved in one of the investigations, or in other realms, his change of tack does not make sense. Perhaps he has been emboldened by his read on how the midterms might shake out.

Somethings different though.



posted on Aug, 24 2018 @ 10:46 AM
link   
Satire:




posted on Aug, 24 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Arnie123

They use to hate Sessions(weed stance) before they were for Sessions.



They are so desperate at this point that Trump could clone himself and then if the clone went against Trump, they would then support the clone.



posted on Aug, 24 2018 @ 11:33 AM
link   
a reply to: SgtHamsandwich



So true.



posted on Aug, 24 2018 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

Prolly sessions is being blackmailed by rosenstein or mueller to avoid a investigation.



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join