It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: SlapMonkey
A) If you go to other countries sure, but in America the VAST MAJORITY is white identity politics. Since the majority of the population is white it is just considered politics..
B) BWAHAHAHA
Oh that is hilarious... slavery ended less than 2 life times ago and millions of people who went through segregation are still alive today..
That is literally the dumbest thing I will read all week...
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
An intelligent human being doesn't need to forgive and forget the enslavement and transgressions of people of long ago. ... I'm not excusing the way that black people have historically been treated since emancipation, but to pretend that anyone has direct ties to being a slave and must forgive and forget is downright absurd.
Well scratch that.. red kneck saying those who vandalized confederate statues should be executed is, but your real close..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: caterpillage
I think there is a special level of crappy in only one group being subject to slavery because of the pile on effect..
...
Only blacks could be enslaved in America.. that makes them inferior to everyone else..
During the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, Indian slavery, the enslavement of Native Americans by European colonists, was common. Many of these Native slaves were exported to the Northern colonies and to off-shore colonies, especially the "sugar islands" of the Caribbean. Historian Alan Gallay estimates that from 1670 to 1715, British slave traders sold between 24,000 and 51,000 Native Americans from what is now the southern part of the U.S.
The Easily-Searched Wiki Page on Slaver in The United States
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Oh the Inca had plenty of weapons, but they did not have steel/iron armor nor muskets and cannon.
www.history.com...
In 1531, he sailed down to Peru, landing at Tumbes. He led his army up the Andes Mountains and on November 15, 1532, reached the Inca town of Cajamarca, where Atahuallpa was enjoying the hot springs in preparation for his march on Cuzco, the capital of his brother’s kingdom. Pizarro invited Atahuallpa to attend a feast in his honor, and the emperor accepted. Having just won one of the largest battles in Inca history, and with an army of 30,000 men at his disposal, Atahuallpa thought he had nothing to fear from the bearded white stranger and his 180 men. Pizarro, however, planned an ambush, setting up his artillery at the square of Cajamarca.
On November 16, Atahuallpa arrived at the meeting place with an escort of several thousand men, all apparently unarmed. Pizarro sent out a priest to exhort the emperor to accept the sovereignty of Christianity and Emperor Charles V., and Atahuallpa refused, flinging a Bible handed to him to the ground in disgust. Pizarro immediately ordered an attack. Buckling under an assault by the terrifying Spanish artillery, guns, and cavalry (all of which were alien to the Incas), thousands of Incas were slaughtered, and the emperor was captured.
Atahuallpa offered to fill a room with treasure as ransom for his release, and Pizarro accepted. Eventually, some 24 tons of gold and silver were brought to the Spanish from throughout the Inca empire. Although Atahuallpa had provided the richest ransom in the history of the world, Pizarro treacherously put him on trial for plotting to overthrow the Spanish, for having his half-brother Huascar murdered, and for several other lesser charges. A Spanish tribunal convicted Atahuallpa and sentenced him to die. On August 29, 1533, the emperor was tied to a stake and offered the choice of being burned alive or strangled by garrote if he converted to Christianity. In the hope of preserving his body for mummification, Atahuallpa chose the latter, and an iron collar was tightened around his neck until he died.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Don't like the BBC, nor there take on history or politics, because its skewered, and designed to spoon feed an agenda.
Plenty of other source material pertaining to the subject of superior veracity i imagine.
originally posted by: andy06shake
Thanks for the thought all the same but stay back from that BBC, they don't just want a license fee, they want our hearts and minds.
originally posted by: andy06shake
.
Colonization is never pretty through.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain
More like slaughter on par with the Nazis and Stalin really.
originally posted by: pointessa
My question is " How many generations does it take to become un-victimized?" Do I get to find an injustice to my ancestors to claim victimhood and the alleged benefits that come from being in that club?