It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Grambler
Does Trump really have to do ANYTHING? I mean, if treason charges are brought against him its still incumbent upon a Republican controlled congress to do something about it right, and I don't think anyone here believes Republicans are going to impeach Trump.....
originally posted by: Dragoon01
a reply to: GeechQuestInfo
My Best friend is a former Federal prosecutor.
I have had extensive discussion with him.
He worked on the John Gotti case.
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have the single highest concentration of dumb people per poster on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have the single highest concentration of dumb people per poster on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully
That’s two posts I have seen of you guys n the past ten minutes calling people dumb
Your insults add nothing to the conversation, and aren’t even funny
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have the single highest concentration of dumb people per poster on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully
That’s two posts I have seen of you guys n the past ten minutes calling people dumb
Your insults add nothing to the conversation, and aren’t even funny
He’s not wrong, and it doesn’t just extend to the President Trump threads....
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have the single highest concentration of dumb people per poster on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully
That’s two posts I have seen of you guys n the past ten minutes calling people dumb
Your insults add nothing to the conversation, and aren’t even funny
He’s not wrong, and it doesn’t just extend to the President Trump threads....
Hahahaha
A whole gang of people that can’t intellectually keep up with anyone that resort to just saying people are dumb
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have the single highest concentration of dumb people per poster on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully
That’s two posts I have seen of you guys n the past ten minutes calling people dumb
Your insults add nothing to the conversation, and aren’t even funny
He’s not wrong, and it doesn’t just extend to the President Trump threads....
Hahahaha
A whole gang of people that can’t intellectually keep up with anyone that resort to just saying people are dumb
Your post is about Trump destroying evidence that the SDNY already has, which is why they charged Michael Cohen. The evidence they would need is already in their possession.
They won’t charge Trump because you can’t indict a sitting president with a crime.
I think dumb works just fine. Do you have another word I may be missing to describe the theory?
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have one of the highest concentrations of dumb people and uninformed MAGA-humpers on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully twisting the truth, or if they're really this dumb....
originally posted by: Grambler
So there is a chance trump may be found guilty of campaign finance violations working with his lawyer cohen who plead guilty today.
As I have stated all along, if trump did the crime, he should be punished.
But I have a strategic question involving trumps defense.
There is a solid chance that cohens testimony enough may not be enough evidence.
In fact, there is also a chance that they will need more evidence from trump that they didnt get from cohen. Cell records, emails, etc.
And so this evidence will be subpoenaed.
So why doesnt trump just destroy all requested evidence?
The precedent has been set with the hillary case, destroying subpoenaed evidence is a ok, and nothing bad will happen to you because of it.
In fact, why doesnt everyone use this strategy from now on?
I mean, its not like the fbi agents who were praising hillary and bashing trump that were in charge of both initial investigations would have had different standards for the two cases, right?
And then once that evidence is destroyed, and no possible conviction can be made, trump supporters can then brag that the investigation exonerated him, just like hillary supporters did, right?
I mean I myself would be appalled if trump did this, but as a legal defense, it seems pretty air tight.
And hillary supporting trump haters would no doubt agree that there is nothing unethical about it, and it is a perfectly legal thing to do.
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
originally posted by: Grambler
So there is a chance trump may be found guilty of campaign finance violations working with his lawyer cohen who plead guilty today.
As I have stated all along, if trump did the crime, he should be punished.
But I have a strategic question involving trumps defense.
There is a solid chance that cohens testimony enough may not be enough evidence.
In fact, there is also a chance that they will need more evidence from trump that they didnt get from cohen. Cell records, emails, etc.
And so this evidence will be subpoenaed.
So why doesnt trump just destroy all requested evidence?
The precedent has been set with the hillary case, destroying subpoenaed evidence is a ok, and nothing bad will happen to you because of it.
In fact, why doesnt everyone use this strategy from now on?
I mean, its not like the fbi agents who were praising hillary and bashing trump that were in charge of both initial investigations would have had different standards for the two cases, right?
And then once that evidence is destroyed, and no possible conviction can be made, trump supporters can then brag that the investigation exonerated him, just like hillary supporters did, right?
I mean I myself would be appalled if trump did this, but as a legal defense, it seems pretty air tight.
And hillary supporting trump haters would no doubt agree that there is nothing unethical about it, and it is a perfectly legal thing to do.
If Hillary was still in office this Congress would have impeached her. You can bet on it.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Grambler
You people are ridiculous. This used to be a fun website. Now it may have the single highest concentration of dumb people per poster on the entire internet.
Sometimes I cant decide if people on here are just being disingenuous and willfully
That’s two posts I have seen of you guys n the past ten minutes calling people dumb
Your insults add nothing to the conversation, and aren’t even funny
He’s not wrong, and it doesn’t just extend to the President Trump threads....
Hahahaha
A whole gang of people that can’t intellectually keep up with anyone that resort to just saying people are dumb
Your post is about Trump destroying evidence that the SDNY already has, which is why they charged Michael Cohen. The evidence they would need is already in their possession.
They won’t charge Trump because you can’t indict a sitting president with a crime.
I think dumb works just fine. Do you have another word I may be missing to describe the theory?
So somehow you know no more evidence will be requested of trump?
Very impressive!
Can you please divulge your source inside the investigation that let you know they will be getting no more evidence from trump?
And also if it turns out later that investigators due request evidence from trump, will you please come back on and admit how wrong you were?
Meanwhile, the thread was not a literal suggestion as was easy to see, but instead was pointing out the hypocrisy of people that had no problem with Hillary destroying subpoenaed evidence but would freak out had trump done that