It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Air tight defense for Trump

page: 4
42
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:24 AM
link   
Cohen's lawyer is saying Cohen has a lot of information that Robert Mueller will be interested in hearing.




posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

You do understand Grambler is being "tongue in cheek?"



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

This is the legal strategy you're advising?


Ha ha ha ha ha ha



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

They didn't feel the need to shut these women up until trump was running for office even though both incidents happened years and years ago. I'd say the campaigns is the exclusive reason the money was paid.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Except Hillary didn't destroy evidence. The right just loves believing she did.
Hey I know... Let's ask Russians to find them and publish this incriminating data that that will put her away. Oh wait.


Yes she did

And you know she did too

Paul combetta, one of Hillary’s employees did days after it was subpoenaed

He even went on Reddit asking for help on how to destroy it



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:35 AM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

And Cohen has plead guilty for doing it. He is going to jail for it. He did implicate trump in it though. Deeply in it.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

Yeah they spelled out why Hillary would be convicted too if I recall correctly.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: xtradimensions
a reply to: Lumenari
I could be wrong, but as I understand it, Cohen paid the hush money out of his own money and then Trump repaid him. I think the way it is being classified as campaign funds is that the money paid out as hush money is seen to be a “loan” from Cohen used for campaign reasons—those reasons being to keep Stormy quiet since she only came forward as a result of Trump’s campaign for President. And then that “loan” was more than legally allowed as a campaign donation, which is what it is being labeled. It is a bit of a stretch in my opinion, but that is how I understand the charges.

Why Trump didn’t just pay her cash through an intermediary out of his own pocket still seems to be the question to me, then none of this would be an issue.


Yeah if he had been a bit more underhanded he could get away with all of this.
Yea piss, shlt, and corruption...



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:42 AM
link   
So, now the other shoe has dropped with many more to come.

Of course, we know about Nixon and his "missing tapes" and how that turned out for him.

These politics are vicious and we are in a total all-out war now. I would hate to see Americans out-right turn on one another but a Civil (haha) War it will be.

Trump was never the candidate people thought he was. MAGA - what a joke on the average Joe. He was certainly no knight on a white horse people thought he was. I hope the voting citizenry has learned a lesson. They're all dirty-just how dirty and dirty where differs as well a who their friends and foes are.
edit on 22-8-2018 by Justso because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:44 AM
link   
a reply to: ausername

He has much to worry about.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

This is just the begining.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

They believe in a letter of the alphabet being an insider predicting some coming storm.
Now would be a good time to stop being so reticent. LOL



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler




which the fbi has said is no punishment at all

When did they say this?



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 07:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: Grambler
So why doesnt trump just destroy all requested evidence?

The President probably reads this site anonymously. We're all pretty sure of that.

Were you sliding a suggestion by him? ;-)


LMAO! Conservative delusion is incredible! You honestly believe Trump reads this site?????

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!


Liberal delusion is way more fun. Never once heard of sarcasm on his lifetime.

On topic: I got you Grambler, sadly none HRC supporter stated their opinion on destroying evidence.

I guess it doesn't work both ways, huh...
edit on 22/8/2018 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 08:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler




which the fbi has said is no punishment at all

When did they say this?


Great, so you have nothing to say about being wrong about Hillary’s team destroying subpoenaed evidence

Ok moving in

Um, the fbi said that it was ok when they acknowledged the evidence was destroyed, but did not charge anyone in Hillary’s team with a crime, even when they had proof of premeditation in combettas reddit thread



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

What are the details of this fine Obama had to pay?



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 08:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou

originally posted by: Swills

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: Grambler
So why doesnt trump just destroy all requested evidence?

The President probably reads this site anonymously. We're all pretty sure of that.

Were you sliding a suggestion by him? ;-)


LMAO! Conservative delusion is incredible! You honestly believe Trump reads this site?????

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!


Liberal delusion is way more fun. Never once heard of sarcasm on his lifetime.

On topic: I got you Grambler, sadly none HRC supporter stated their opinion on destroying evidence.

I guess it doesn't work both ways, huh...


Ten stars for antediluvian (who is great btw) saying trump supporters shouldn’t want trump to destroy evidence because future people may do it

Completely oblivious to the fact that they cheered for exactly that, allowing Hillary to destroy evidence and the fbi not charging her

They literally are saying that their candidates should be allowed to break any laws at all and the fbi should give them a pass, but warning us that no candidate they dislike should be allowed to do that

It may be the most obvious example of partisan bias and cognitive dissonance I have ever seen



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 08:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Why?



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 08:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

What are the details of this fine Obama had to pay?


You literally wrote 4 or five posts on the thread discussing it today

So I take this as acknowledging you don’t even read the material on the threads you post on



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 08:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Why does teflon Don have to cover? Hmmmmm???
And you are aware that teflon Don referred to John Gotti, a mafia criminal who evaded conviction every time he went to court.

Until he didn't and died in prison.
Something you may want to consider before saddling trump with the same name.



new topics

top topics



 
42
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join