It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

GOP leader accuses Twitter of censoring conservatives, doesn't go as planned

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The people defending this are so obviously brainwashed by their own bias...its very excruciating to watch the stupidly.





posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The people defending this are so obviously brainwashed by their own bias...its very excruciating to watch the stupidly.




Are you even capable of understanding the irony in what you just posted?

You post a video about YT "coming for me next", which is still available on YT.



Yes, the stupidity is excruciating.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen

and demonstrate his inability to use Twitter?


Why do you keep saying that? Obviously he's referring to the fact that her content was deemed sensitive.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
And do you suppose AT&T, Sprint and Verizon should be able to start turning off the phones of people that they dont like what they are saying?


Those are pay services so it's not apples to apples although I suspect if you were doing something illegal they potentially could rescind your contract.


Paid or not it doesnt make a difference. That isn't the reason why Sprint, Verizon or other major phone companies cant do that. Do a little reading about it. Pretty soon the same reasons why the phone companies cant do it will be the same reasons why Facebook, Twitter and other such platforms wont be able to do it.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen

and demonstrate his inability to use Twitter?


Why do you keep saying that? Obviously he's referring to the fact that her content was deemed sensitive.


No. He said censored, which it was not.

All he had to do was click on something to see the rest of the tweet.

He did not know how to use it, apparently.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Alien Abduct

Lol. You clearly don't know much about Twitter's policy here. It doesn't exclusively target conservatives.

If you read the thread chain on Twitter, you'll see that other posters have posted other examples from non-conservative sources that have had the sensitive material label also slapped on it.
twitter.com...
edit on 20-8-2018 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The people defending this are so obviously brainwashed by their own bias...its very excruciating to watch the stupidly.




Are you even capable of understanding the irony in what you just posted?

You post a video about YT "coming for me next", which is still available on YT.



Yes, the stupidity is excruciating.


Still having reading comprehension problems today?

"Coming for me" means you know, in the future. Obviously they havent CAME for him yet because its still on YouTube.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Alien Abduct

Lol. You clearly don't know much about Twitter's policy here. It doesn't exclusively target conservatives.

If you read the thread chain on Twitter, you'll see that other posters have posted other examples from non-conservative sources that have had the sensitive material label also slapped on it.
twitter.com...


Quote me where i said that Twitter is exclusively targeting conservatives.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen

and demonstrate his inability to use Twitter?


Why do you keep saying that? Obviously he's referring to the fact that her content was deemed sensitive.

No. He obviously was attempting to stir the partisan pot and create idiotic controversy but ended up showing his Twitter illiteracy instead. What's even funnier, is that instead of recognizing his mistake he is doubling down on idiocy and now trying to claim the sensitive material warning is censorship. But if that were the case, any screen on the internet that required you to enter your age before entering would also be censorship. So yeah...



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The people defending this are so obviously brainwashed by their own bias...its very excruciating to watch the stupidly.




Are you even capable of understanding the irony in what you just posted?

You post a video about YT "coming for me next", which is still available on YT.



Yes, the stupidity is excruciating.


Still having reading comprehension problems today?

"Coming for me" means you know, in the future. Obviously they havent CAME for him yet because its still on YouTube.


Exactly.

It's still on youtube.

Stop and think about that.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Alien Abduct

Well regardless of what you think about why Twitter put a content warning on Ingraham's Tweet, you are still wrong for hating on the policy. Content warning stickers exist throughout the internet. Calling them censorship is dumb, and telling people they are brainwashed for not having an issue with the policy is the height of arrogance.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
Do a little reading about it.


I don't have to read anything to know that a paid service is wholly different than a free service, maybe you should read up on the differences.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Alien Abduct

Well regardless of what you think about why Twitter put a content warning on Ingraham's Tweet, you are still wrong for hating on the policy. Content warning stickers exist throughout the internet. Calling them censorship is dumb, and telling people they are brainwashed for not having an issue with the policy is the height of arrogance.


But they have videos proving they are coming for them....which still happen to be available on the very site that is coming for them.

It's a conspiracy to make you think they are going to remove your content, but they won't remove it, which proves the conspiracy because they are using reverse psychology and stuffs.




posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Heh. It's the same silly conspiracy where people who peruse CT sites go around convincing themselves that merely existing on those forums and engaging with people will put them on a watch list of some sort. Just evolved for the modern partisan tinted era.
edit on 20-8-2018 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
...only around 25% of the adults in the US use twitter.


And 99% of them are narcissistic tool bags.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Twitter does CENSOR conservatives.

FACT not accusation.



Not all of them and maybe those who get some kind of censorship should stop lying, spreading fake news and maybe just maybe, stop being a racist.




posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The people defending this are so obviously brainwashed by their own bias...its very excruciating to watch the stupidly.




Are you even capable of understanding the irony in what you just posted?

You post a video about YT "coming for me next", which is still available on YT.



Yes, the stupidity is excruciating.


Still having reading comprehension problems today?

"Coming for me" means you know, in the future. Obviously they havent CAME for him yet because its still on YouTube.


Exactly.

It's still on youtube.

Stop and think about that.


Dude there is nothing to think about. He said “They are coming for me next” and yes he said it about YouTube on a video on YouTube. What’s your point?

Would it be any different if a news reporter while live on TV stated that his agency was coming for his job next? What’s your point?



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
He said “They are coming for me next”...


So he's just being a whiney little bitch?



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: introvert
...only around 25% of the adults in the US use twitter.


And 99% of them are narcissistic tool bags.


Have you been reading my twit feed again?

Good.

Share it with your friends on Facebook, follow me on twitter, instagram, subscribe to my youtube and you better hurry...before the "man" comes after me to take it all down.



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
What’s your point?

He's likely wrong and over reacting since Youtube isn't taking him down at all, let alone next.




top topics



 
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join