It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump revokes security clearance for former CIA director John Brennan

page: 4
22
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa


When did he do that?




posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: yuppa


When did he do that?



You know when. others have posted it here as well. CNN was given info by him before. So stop playing stupid. Its embarrassing.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus
The fool was leaking classified information and you wonder why his security clearance was revoked?

Really? Just wow.


Thats a heck of a charge. I can't seem to find whatever 'classified' information it was proven that Brennan leaked. Would you mind sharing?

Otherwise it seems pretty obviously a petty/spiteful action and not really one based in reality.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Xcathdra




Brennans first amendment was not violated....


I don't know about that, but he was certainly publicly punished for exercising his 1st Amendments rights. And, Trump seems to be threatening others with the same treatment for, and if, they do the same.

It doesn't look good for Trump, in my opinion, especially since the WSJ interview where Trump states the Russian "witch hunt" is what motivated him to revoke Brennon's security clearance and maybe others.








Brennans right ended when he broke the law on sharing classified info.


Wait, so Brennan 'Broke the law by sharing classified information' and all Trump is going to do is remove his clearance? I'm having a hard time making sense of that, since a logical person would assume if Brennan broke the law Trump would throw the hammer at him.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 01:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: yuppa


When did he do that?



You know when. others have posted it here as well. CNN was given info by him before. So stop playing stupid. Its embarrassing.


No! I don't know. Haven't seen it. You made the accusation. Back it up!

I haven't seen any evidence of Brennen breaking the law and sharing classified info. If I missed it in this thread, please link it. I have seen accusations, but nothing concrete. Just like Trump's accusation that Brennon's behavior is erratic. Show me!



edit on 17-8-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Rand Paul. Lol. Nuff said...



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

He never did that and in fact that is not even hinted at within the reason given by trump or Sarah Sukabee Flanders.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Rand Paul. Lol. Nuff said...


Paul isn't actually the source of that, Reuters is.

You should click on a link once in a while before you post. It would help you make informed posts and stop embarrassing yourself. Still batting 0.000 on accuracy.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


I read your link, and I don't find the accusation credible. Rand Paul, is playing politics, and he, nor you or I have any business trying to unskew CIA intelligence/counter intelligence scenarios. And no, everyone doesn't know who leaked, or if leaking was part of a counter intelligence strategy!

Don't second guess the CIA, that operates at the will of the presiding President and answers no one else. Trump has no idea what was happening with the CIA 8 years, or more, ago, and the CIA doesn't answer to Rand Paul.

There is nothing more obvious than Trump's motivation to revoke Brennan's security clearance, and that's to send a chilling message that he will punish anyone else who want's to publicaly criticise him too.

This is really not looking good for Trump. Obstruction, witness tampering, conspiriacy....all coming into perfect focus.





edit on 17-8-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Nope. Never happened.
🎶 you knows... won't cut it dude.
And that was because you don't know. You just made that up on the spot.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

He sure looks like one. Wonder what bridge he lives under?



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen


I read your link, and I don't find the accusation credible. Rand Paul, is playing politics, and he, nor you or I have any business trying to unskew CIA intelligence/counter intelligence scenarios. And no, everyone doesn't know who leaked, or if leaking was part of a counter intelligence strategy!

Don't second guess the CIA, that operates at the will of the presiding President and answers no one else. Trump has no idea what was happening with the CIA 8 years, or more, ago, and the CIA doesn't answer to Rand Paul.

There is nothing more obvious than Trump's motivation to revoke Brennan's security clearance, and that's to send a chilling message that he will punish anyone else who want's to publicaly criticise him too.

This is really not looking good for Trump. Obstruction, witness tampering, conspiriacy....all coming into perfect focus.






Paul's accusation is based on a 2012 Reuters article. Were they working for Trump too?



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Yeah... no... I click on my own links. You can gat viruses if you want. I'm more careful with my devices.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

💥😃💥



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

And you're warning me about embarrassing myself?
Pffft... Now you're hilarious.
edit on 8172018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

The moron in chief thinks it will curtail other saying bad stuff about him.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Did you not see the reasons for that not happening?



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:15 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Still can't find your words?

Ill pray for you.



posted on Aug, 17 2018 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

No he doesn't need it for that and this certainly won't stop him.
Trump created a monster and another reason for all of Washington to say WTF is wrong with you dude?



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join