It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stormcell
originally posted by: openyourmind1262
a reply to: gr8skott
Yea, shatting on the side walk don't really help anyone ...does it? San Fran most liberal area in the country...…..In my opinion....this is SOCIALISM at it's finest. It' what the liberal SJW of San Fran want. So if you want it then live with the shat on the sidewalk. Or spend that cash on social programs to help these people out. Or just do nothing and think the problem's gonna go away......Doing nothing aint working folks.
Normally the homeless would poop into plastic bags and toss those plastic bags into trash cans. But to be environmentally friendly San Francisco banned plastic bags. So the homeless have nowhere to poop.
The city could distribute camping van potties.
originally posted by: Necrobile
originally posted by: gr8skott
The money they are going to spend on power washers, water, and manpower indefinitely washing feces off the streets would be better spent helping the people who are crapping there.
Do you know how much those items will cost compared to offering "quality" mental health care?? Something tells me that it would be cheaper in the long run to hire some people to clean the streets than to put in the time and effort into "fixing" the mental health of the homeless, especially because many are homeless for different reasons.
My wife and I have actually volunteered at the homeless shelter around here a few times, and even though it's a small town, we have a lot of homeless people. Some are homeless because they aren't capable of taking care of themselves and have no one to take care of them. Others are homeless by choice, either because they're alcoholics/drug abusers, too prideful to take advantage of programs to help them, or young/naive and don't feel like being a part of society. Some of them are there for one simple reason......# happens.
My point being is that "quality" mental health would not be cheap in the long run. I know hiring people to clean the streets isn't the best solution, but raising taxes on everyone so people can have "quality" mental health care isn't going to help, either. I'm currently the only one working and I have to take care of my wife, my 2 dogs and myself. If my taxes were raised for mental health care, then there's a good chance I wouldn't be able to make it anymore. At least I'd have mental health care, though, right??
originally posted by: gr8skott
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Sounds like it's an American problem, not a city one.
If it's an American problem, then it's an American cultural problem. This crap didn't happen before we started rejecting personal responsibility, excusing failure, and coddling weakness.
www.numbeo.com...
www.numbeo.com...
The answer is an iron fist where enforcement and tolerance is concerned. Screw up badly enough and instead of getting coddled and covered for, you should get removed permanently from the community.
Right, and all the mentally ill will easily adjust! Definitely the reason for all this drug addiction and homelessness is a lack of laws and law enforcement! Just punish and alienate people who haven’t been given any direction in life! It’s definitely their own fault for not trying harder and doesn’t have anything to do with the lack of resources and attention, and abuse many of these people received as children!
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: gr8skott
They should train the stray dogs to clean up after the stray humans.
originally posted by: generik
originally posted by: gr8skott
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Sounds like it's an American problem, not a city one.
If it's an American problem, then it's an American cultural problem. This crap didn't happen before we started rejecting personal responsibility, excusing failure, and coddling weakness.
www.numbeo.com...
www.numbeo.com...
The answer is an iron fist where enforcement and tolerance is concerned. Screw up badly enough and instead of getting coddled and covered for, you should get removed permanently from the community.
Right, and all the mentally ill will easily adjust! Definitely the reason for all this drug addiction and homelessness is a lack of laws and law enforcement! Just punish and alienate people who haven’t been given any direction in life! It’s definitely their own fault for not trying harder and doesn’t have anything to do with the lack of resources and attention, and abuse many of these people received as children!
your constant blathering about the homeless and their mental problems, and about the government not properly helping them as well as caring for them, is getting a bit tiresome. yes a great many homeless do in fact have mental problems that should be appropriately dealt with. but mental illness is far from the only reason. even drug use though another big grouping of the homeless is just one of the many different reasons people are homeless.
so it was a problem to try to help them. now it's a problem that we are not helping them. it seem s that the government is dammed if they do, and dammed if they don't. so if it's cruel to help such people, and take care of them. yet it's also cruel to let them do as they will. what can be done?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: chr0naut
It is the fault of the pandering politicians and the bleeding hearts. This nation used to have and enforce "No Loitering" laws. We also used to have poor farms and asylums where the indigent, the feeble, and the insane were contained in an environment which was designed for their unique needs while not placing undue burdens on the productive majority of society. We need to return to those policies and those practices.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: chr0naut
It isn't my only idea for a solution, mind you. I've said before that I'd support legalizing all drugs. Legalize them and drop the prices down to where nobody has to steal to buy their fix, BUT I also believe we shouldn't be saving these folks from themselves. If an addict overdoses, the public should not be responsible for picking up the tab for their revival... let Darwin's law take it's course and allow nature to do what nature does.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Have you also considered what happens when you blast water at the temporary housing like tents and cardboard?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: chr0naut
Have you also considered what happens when you blast water at the temporary housing like tents and cardboard?
...obviously the pests move.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: chr0naut
We've already established that most of the homeless are that way because they're otherwise unemployable due to issues with addiction or mental illness.
How on earth do you plan to employ them to clean portapotties?
Some of this sounds really nice, but you're basing it on the assumption that these are otherwise normal, functional people who just need to have stuff given to them in order to get off the streets. If that were the case, they'd likely be off the streets pretty quickly. There are many aid orgs already in place designed to give people down on their luck a hand up. Many of the people out on San Fran's streets are the hard-core homeless with much more intractable issues that simply providing handouts to will only serve as a band-aid to, not a realistic, long-term solution.
I share the distaste of others for simply attempting to sweep the problem under the rug by providing easy handouts to make it seem to go away. That's too expensive. There are too many who would be content to simply take and not improve their actual lot.
Unless you can offer a real answer that would actually solve the root issues, it's a non-starter.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: gr8skott
a reply to: PillarOfFire
Glaringly obvious that they're all in it together when they're more willing to hire people to blast %&$& with water than have an ounce of compassion for people in the streets.
Japan pays their homeless to take care of sections or blocks. Streets are clean, and homeless are happy to have a few tasks a couple of yen to spend.
originally posted by: pointessa
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: gr8skott
a reply to: PillarOfFire
Glaringly obvious that they're all in it together when they're more willing to hire people to blast %&$& with water than have an ounce of compassion for people in the streets.
Japan pays their homeless to take care of sections or blocks. Streets are clean, and homeless are happy to have a few tasks a couple of yen to spend.
That is the smartest, most empowering. and most productive concept I have heard to deal with the messes. Leave it to the Japanese.