Trump Escalates Attack on Jeff Sessions, Calling Him ‘Scared Stiff’

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Mach2

What? Sessions recused himself after the election when trump was president.
I'm not in any mood to deal with idiots. Please don't act like one. Thanks.
This law has nothing to do with trump at all.

Then how about posting real factual information and not made up stuff?

I get it, you're not educated enough to understand very easy and simple things.

If all you're going to do is lie and push propanganda, please put a disclaimer on your post "Parody Post", that way we can just simply ignore you and not have to call you out 😏 on things you know nothing about.

The blind hate is strong with that one.

It doesn't matter to liberals that the economy is booming, or that unemployment is down (substantially so for previously underemployed minorities), or that our global trade partners are being forced to enact fair trade practices.

We have rampant crime, and murder rates in our cities. They say nothing.

They point to the election of a clueless socialist as the future.

Russia Russia Russia, even though the administration stance is the hardest line since the cold war.

I don't get the rationale.

Oh wait, they're not rational.

Basically Mr Trump is pointing out he chose poorly by whining about it.

originally posted by: roadgravel
Basically Mr Trump is pointing out he chose poorly by whining about it.

He did choose poorly. I wouldn't say whining, but I'll even give you that much.

Would you agree that he should be able to correct the mistake by firing Sessions?

a reply to: Southern Guardian


It's obvious that this is part of a SECRET plan. Trump has never feared firing anyone. Sessions would have been ousted long ago if he was not "playing ball".

a reply to: Southern Guardian

A GA who gives a skit of what president wants him to do... and a newlyvappointed head of FBI who gives a skit of what president wants him to do...

As in, Deep State can always appoint somebody for the job, who fits the mold.

Scary. Frustrating. Dangerous.

Snakes don’t like fire. So, fire them. Throw the top brass to Potomac and reform those agencies.

deleted - have said enough

originally posted by: Painterz
Does it not say something that even ultra loyal ultra conservative Sessions can't just axe the Russia investigations? That there's so much there even he can't sweep it under the carpet?

The cult of Donald will crap on the bones of Reagan if the orange messiah tells them to.

originally posted by: SaturnFX

originally posted by: Painterz
Does it not say something that even ultra loyal ultra conservative Sessions can't just axe the Russia investigations? That there's so much there even he can't sweep it under the carpet?

The cult of Donald will crap on the bones of Reagan if the orange messiah tells them to.

Wait, what?

We were told to make potty on Reagan's bones?

WHERE?

WHEN?

a reply to: yuppa

I have no idea why. Why did he lie about talking to russians? Perhaps sessions didn't see the big picture? Perhaps trump just hoped he would get a guy who would lie if he needed him to.
Trump is just pissed now because he can't control sessions like he wants to. If he fires him he goes from the frying pan to the fire.

a reply to: Mach2

I'm not getting into a discussion about illegal drug use.

a reply to: Mach2

Trump wasn't in politics before he was elected, so that eliminates that avenue.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I can't seem to quote and post in the same box again. I thought this was fixed yesterday...

Anyway what did you mean by that sentence then?

a reply to: JBurns

He recused himself because he was part of the team being investigated not because he did or didn't commit or have knowledge of a crime. He can't be involved with investigating an organization he himself was a part of.
I know you guys understand this.

a reply to: Southern Guardian

“Our A.G. is scared stiff and Missing in Action.”

“I have never seen anything so Rigged in my life,”

“scared stiff”

attack
begrudge
broadside
harshest
railed

I dunno?
Perhaps projection?

a reply to: Sillyolme

The statute referenced political involvement, as a reason for recusal. I just meant that Trump was never in political office in any capacity whatsoever, so its unlikely that they had any dealings prior to his election, which is what I surmise the "law" was intended to address.

a reply to: Sillyolme

That's fine. Its not the topic, but you brought it up.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JBurns

He recused himself because he was part of the team being investigated not because he did or didn't commit or have knowledge of a crime. He can't be involved with investigating an organization he himself was a part of.
I know you guys understand this.

thats bullocks

the collusion part was already cleared up

on top of that the recusel was improperly done and not legal according to the statutes cited at the time

and on top of that he should have not been recused but resigned if he is unable to perform his duties and not doin so may be criminal in itself.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I do understand, and even agree that it was the thing for Sessions to do, but he should have told Trump that from the beginning. If he had known Sessions had no intention of taking control of the DOJ, he would have appointed someone else. It was a crappy thing for Sessions to do. He cared more about the position than he did about doing the right thing. He should have been upfront, or just declined nomination.

a reply to: Mach2

It should be about what is right for the country, not Trump.

But then we're way past that now with politics.

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: Mach2

It should be about what is right for the country, not Trump.

But then we're way past that now with politics.

What's right for the country is for everything to be made public.

What's right for the country us for the DOJ, and FBI to stop stonewalling, and respond fully, and in a timely manner to their respective congressional oversight committee, regardless of political views, or who the president is.

Do you disagree?