QANON question

I am just wondering why the QANON threads aren't in the RATS forum. The topics of PG, child sex trafficking and walnut sauce have been brought up numerous times in those threads so why aren't they in RATS.

a reply to: Joecanada11

Not enough pizza?

a reply to: Lysergic

well there's more bad news for the mentalists,

anon, the other group of mentalists rogue hackers, just vowed to unmask Q and expose him [them].

no need for a new thread for this tripe

The anarchist hacking group slammed the QAnon conspiracy as potentially dangerous and driven by a "brainless political agenda" in a video posted Sunday to what is widely considered the most reliable Anonymous Twitter account.

Sounds homo-erotic.

H A W T!

vowed to unmask Q and expose him

KER SPLOOOOOSH

a reply to: Joecanada11

If comments were the basis to reassign a thread to a new forum then the thread creator would be punished for the actions of commenters. It's role of a mod to prune those comments as they deem appropriate, provided the opening post meets the forum guidelines.

originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: Joecanada11

If comments were the basis to reassign a thread to a new forum then the thread creator would be punished for the actions of commenters. It's role of a mod to prune those comments as they deem appropriate, provided the opening post meets the forum guidelines.

WOW I was going to answer but you did so better than I would have. Good on you dude

originally posted by: Joecanada11
I am just wondering why the QANON threads aren't in the RATS forum. The topics of PG, child sex trafficking and walnut sauce have been brought up numerous times in those threads so why aren't they in RATS.

Cuz it's totally stupid but people still click on it?

a reply to: drewlander

I'd hazard a guess that it's nearly a full time job moderating that single thread on it's own.

And not because of the pizzagate nonsense either.

More from the amount of triggeredness when someone dares enter "their" thread and question their narrative.

a reply to: Chadwickus

Yeah ive seen what happens when anyone questions the Q narrative. A bombardment of people accusing said person of being a paid shill or other nonsense

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: Chadwickus

Yeah ive seen what happens when anyone questions the Q narrative. A bombardment of people accusing said person of being a paid shill or other nonsense

Most of the "questioners" are intentional annoyers and should be ignored. That's what I do. No need for bombarding them.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: Chadwickus

Yeah ive seen what happens when anyone questions the Q narrative. A bombardment of people accusing said person of being a paid shill or other nonsense

Most of the "questioners" are intentional annoyers and should be ignored. That's what I do. No need for bombarding them.

I 110% agree.

originally posted by: Joecanada11
I am just wondering why the QANON threads aren't in the RATS forum. The topics of PG, child sex trafficking and walnut sauce have been brought up numerous times in those threads so why aren't they in RATS.

Until proven otherwise, it should be in the hoax bin

Whilst ATS is certainly a conspiracy site
giving credence to this kind of tat,
is bad for ATS's 'image'

it’s a proven hoax with the manipulated stock AF1 photos being used and the Missile in Hawaii that wasn’t a missile!

Doesn’t even belong in RATS for those reasons alone

If the mods for whatever reason still want an Alt Right pro trump anti democrat smear campaign on the site then RATS would be best place to keep away the trolls from posting in there

One of the regular posters banned all the time accused ATS owners of being pedos on his pathetic little twitter account that funny enough showed up in a browser tab of one of the main Q contributors in a screen shot.

They are also now a gang sending each other PMs, ignoring people rightly critical of Q and how dangerous this cult is and posting all right memes all the time

It’s a complete waste of bandwidth for ATS

... what is RATS?

What's walnut sauce?

Spamming the thread incessantly with annoying and irrelevant anti Q post repeatedly day in and day out isn't enough now we need entire threads trying to shutdown the conversation?

How about you just don't click on the thread and wallah problem solved?

Q is none other than Secretary of Energy, Rick Perry. Q comes from the Department of Energy's (DOE) Q-Clearance, which stands for Quintessence (Derived from OLD School Alchemy) and is their equivalent of "Top Secret". He's been cleared hot from the WH as a Counter to the Mass Media. Anonymous....is a CIA Information Operation (Formerly Known as PSYOPS), started in 2003, after Baghdad fell as a joke. Turned out to very useful.

a reply to: Joecanada11

The attacks, they are increasing.

99% of the time those subjects are mentioned by people who are only in that thread to disrupt or shut down the discussion.

If you're not interested, vote with your feet and go away, or stay out.

At this point nobody is going to convince "the other guy" to change their mind so just move on.

That you can't "move on" is telling.

The collaboration going on in that thread is classic ATS, if you can't see that, you probably missed the good old days.

a reply to: tjack

It’s a Alt right chan troll political baiting thread and has hoaxed material in its content

The Q believers thought that when Sarah Sanders was asked a question in relation to Q , she would say the opposite of what she did say

the White House renounces them for inciting hate, so they are indeed a hate group

Why don’t the Nazi alt right boys stay on the chans and not infiltrate ATS?

a reply to: Whereismypassword

False. She gave a general response denouncing any group inciting violence. Take off the turd colored glasses for once.

originally posted by: tjack
a reply to: Whereismypassword

False. She gave a general response denouncing any group inciting violence. Take off the turd colored glasses for once.

False, she was replying to a question about Qanon and Blacks for Trump seen at the rally

Want to clarify why you are being dishonest