It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Lock her up” atleast over having her own server, something that everyone knew she had, was propaganda meant for stupid people..
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Deetermined
Russia didn’t do anything wrong.. russia acres in Russia’s best intrest..
Try p is the one who betrayed his country to serve his own personal best intrest..
Those 2 things are not even remotely the same..
How trump’s infantile “I know you are but what am i”defense works for ANYONE, I have no idea..
It is propaganda meant for stupid people..
Propaganda that is debunked with even the slightest bit of knowledge of the situation.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Why??
Russia didn’t betray their country...
Trump did..
Russia did exactly what they should have, exactly what we would have.. whatever was in the best intrest of russia.
If a Russian citizen helps America install the next Russian President, America isn’t in the wrong. The Russian citizen is.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Deetermined
Russia didn’t do anything wrong.. russia acres in Russia’s best intrest..
originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: JoshuaCox
If all of this had been Obama, he would have been impeached long ago!
In addition to failing to report big donors and excess donations in a timely manner, the Obama campaign incorrectly dated the filings dealing with $85 million in funds, the FEC claims. This error appears to have been primarily the result of one transfer to the campaign committee from the Obama Victory Fund, a fundraising group that includes money raised by the Democratic National Committee that is earmarked for the presidential race.
1. This lawsuit seeks to compel the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) to take action on an administrative complaint the Committee to Defend the President (“CDP”) filed with the FEC four months ago disclosing the existence of an unprecedented nationwide scheme to violate federal campaign finance law in which $84 million was effectively laundered over more than a year by the Hillary Victory Fund (“HVF”) through dozens of state political party committees to the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) and, ultimately, to Hillary for America (“HFA”).
The revelation is troubling, since China's government has a history of trying to manipulate U.S. politicians, especially — but not exclusively — Democrats.
In 1996, Chinese agent Johnny Chung gave almost $100,000 to American politicians, much of it from powerful members of China's military. Chung reportedly gave $300,000 to President Clinton's campaign.
The Justice Department in 1997 launched two investigations of reported attempts of high-level Chinese officials to "buy influence" with U.S. politicians, especially the Democratic National Committee.
With the Internet, China seems to have found a road to political clout bigger than an eight-lane highway.
originally posted by: Deetermined
originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: JoshuaCox
If all of this had been Obama, he would have been impeached long ago!
LOL! Yeah, right!
The most that ever happens during corrupt elections are fines being issued by the FEC...
"Obama Campaign Fined Big for Hiding Donors, Keeping Illegal Donations"
In addition to failing to report big donors and excess donations in a timely manner, the Obama campaign incorrectly dated the filings dealing with $85 million in funds, the FEC claims. This error appears to have been primarily the result of one transfer to the campaign committee from the Obama Victory Fund, a fundraising group that includes money raised by the Democratic National Committee that is earmarked for the presidential race.
www.usnews.com...
Hey! Wait a minute! Doesn't that sound similar to the same thing that Hillary Clinton's campaign was doing??!!
1. This lawsuit seeks to compel the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) to take action on an administrative complaint the Committee to Defend the President (“CDP”) filed with the FEC four months ago disclosing the existence of an unprecedented nationwide scheme to violate federal campaign finance law in which $84 million was effectively laundered over more than a year by the Hillary Victory Fund (“HVF”) through dozens of state political party committees to the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) and, ultimately, to Hillary for America (“HFA”).
thefederalist.com...
Even Investors.com talked about all of the past corruption and foreign influence in elections...
The revelation is troubling, since China's government has a history of trying to manipulate U.S. politicians, especially — but not exclusively — Democrats.
In 1996, Chinese agent Johnny Chung gave almost $100,000 to American politicians, much of it from powerful members of China's military. Chung reportedly gave $300,000 to President Clinton's campaign.
The Justice Department in 1997 launched two investigations of reported attempts of high-level Chinese officials to "buy influence" with U.S. politicians, especially the Democratic National Committee.
With the Internet, China seems to have found a road to political clout bigger than an eight-lane highway.
www.investors.com...
originally posted by: Metallicus
What exactly do you consider collusion?
Talking to a Russian national? Having a meeting?? Doing business?
I mean wth even is it you object to?
I have yet to hear anything that would be criminal.
originally posted by: Metallicus
What exactly do you consider collusion?