InfoWars Banned from Facebook and iTunes

a reply to: Words

Because I see nothing to defend. The 1st Amendment wasn't violated, and I already boycott Apple for other reasons. So there is nothing for me to get bothered about.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Because I see nothing to defend. The 1st Amendment wasn't violated, and I already boycott Apple for other reasons. So there is nothing for me to get bothered about.

It's an infringement upon a fundamental human right. Censorship is a common practice of the worst regimes, dictators, theocrats and governments in history. Just know that others will stand up for your human rights if and when the moment arises, even if you cannot be bothered to do the same.

a reply to: Words

I really don't care if Apple infringes on rights or not. I only care if a government does it. As long as Apple isn't breaking the law then I see no issue.

Also, I was in the Army. I've already stood up for my rights. Thank you very much.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I really don't care if Apple infringes on rights or not. I only care if a government does it.

Do you not care for free speech?
.

Guys, don t fall for this, this is a distraction, Alex and crew are on the bashing Qanon badwagon making the people who believes Q wost then “conspirace theorists”, they know that this will only get more infowars audience, i repeat THIS IS A DISTRACTION move on.

originally posted by: Words
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I really don't care if Apple infringes on rights or not. I only care if a government does it.

Do you not care for free speech?
.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Words

Because I see nothing to defend. The 1st Amendment wasn't violated, and I already boycott Apple for other reasons. So there is nothing for me to get bothered about.

The first amendment is simply being bypassed. The result remains the same.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Words
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I really don't care if Apple infringes on rights or not. I only care if a government does it.

Do you not care for free speech?
.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I said free speech. Do you not care for free speech?

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Words

Because I see nothing to defend. The 1st Amendment wasn't violated, and I already boycott Apple for other reasons. So there is nothing for me to get bothered about.

The first amendment is simply being bypassed. The result remains the same.

Well this is a lie. The 1st Amendment can only be violated if the government is involved. You clearly need to go study up on civics.

originally posted by: Words

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Words
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I really don't care if Apple infringes on rights or not. I only care if a government does it.

Do you not care for free speech?
.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I said free speech. Do you not care for free speech?

I've made my point clear. Alex Jones isn't entitled to having his product hosted on Apple's services. Trying to spin this as a free speech issue is dumb and really shows you don't respect Apple's rights.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth

Boohoo. He has a website of his own. If people don't visit it then that is his own marketing problem.

Marketing on the internet requires content sharing and search in the mix... and they are massive drivers off traffic. Far more so than paid media.
Infowars is dead, they just don't know it yet.
Whether Jones content is tripe or not, I can't really can't see the good in this coordinated effort. It highlights the power to pick winners and losers in the hands of the very few.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth

Boohoo. He has a website of his own. If people don't visit it then that is his own marketing problem.

Marketing on the internet requires content sharing and search in the mix... and they are massive drivers off traffic. Far more so than paid media.
Infowars is dead, they just don't know it yet.
Whether Jones content is tripe or not, I can't really can't see the good in this coordinated effort. It highlights the power to pick winners and losers in the hands of the very few.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yea, Im sure you would. And I can cook homeless people in my basement because its on a private property.

And this - if I make you sign me a contract - lets say employment contract under a minimal wage --- its not valid. The part of the contract that is unlawful is not valid. Their T&C use to have thousands of pages because its legaly binding them to provide you a service.
Lawyers are burning his phone by now. Im pretty sure they are drooling to get it

a reply to: UKTruth

Well that's how capitalism works in reality. The top earners tend to coordinate to eliminate or absorb the competition and eventually end up as monopolies. But that is a story for a different thread.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well this is a lie. The 1st Amendment can only be violated if the government is involved. You clearly need to go study up on civics.

If politicians where not sponsored by corporations or governments did not use corporations to there own ends I might believe you. But this is simply not the case.

If the world was a simple as the propaganda provided in your civcs it would all be a lot easier. But the world is far more complex than that.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I've made my point clear. Alex Jones isn't entitled to having his product hosted on Apple's services. Trying to spin this as a free speech issue is dumb and really shows you don't respect Apple's rights.

It is a free speech issue. Do you or do you not care for free speech? Or is a trillion-dollar corporation's right to censor a user more important?

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well this is a lie. The 1st Amendment can only be violated if the government is involved. You clearly need to go study up on civics.

If politicians where not sponsored by corporations or governments did not use corporations to there own ends I might believe you. But this is simply not the case.

If the world was a simple as the propaganda provided in your civcs it would all be a lot easier. But the world is far more complex than that.

I don't care if you believe me or not. You are lying if you are claiming that the 1st Amendment was violated. Well either that or you are just plain ignorant to how the Bill of Rights works.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth

Well that's how capitalism works in reality. The top earners tend to coordinate to eliminate or absorb the competition and eventually end up as monopolies. But that is a story for a different thread.

Yes and monopolies end up as dictatorship as is that case here. The USA has been sold through the back door and your licking it up like sugar candy.

a reply to: purplemer

Monopoly busting is an aspect of Democratic Socialism. As far as conservatives are concerned we should be ok with monopolies because breaking them up is government intervention.

I didn't realise Jones was so popular... his app has gone to #4 on the charts for free apps, above the likes off CNN, MSNBC and NYT.

To put CNNs hypocrisy into perspective, they have tweeted to apple to remove the app. So who is it that is really attacking media outlets, CNN?