It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: UKTruth
SHHHHHH!
HUSH!
If the left is going to make "taking a meeting" as collusion and treason, let them!
Like most everything else, it'll bite them in the ass.
And it'll be funny.
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: MiddleInsite
Oppps. Took me too long to write my comment. Someone already beat me to "but Hillary"
HDS is strong with this group.
Ah, I see you binge on leftist kool-aid yourself, not that you'll ever believe anything outside of liberal media.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: UKTruth
The mental gymnastics is working overtime today, eh?
TBH, I'm not putting all my eggs in the Collusion basket and never have, but as time goes on the evidence continues to mount that there was indeed collusion and today Trump admitted it himself but thinks the excuse he didn't know will keep him out of trouble. As if I'm ever gonna believe that.
So this is all legal you say? Looks to me you've been drinking way too much conservative media to think that's at all legal. Imagine if Obama's campaign was found to be working with Russia over the same, dirt on Hillary, do you really think you wouldn't attack him, calling everything totally legal and move on?
originally posted by: Muninn
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: Kharron
Assuming the opponent refered to was HRC, would information gathering be illegal? What if the information sought had to do with the Uranium 1 deal?
Learn the FACTS on the Uranium thing.
Enlighten us then.
Where is your information that the Russian lawyer was involved in trying to interfere with the 2016 election?
You just made that up - a complete lie - for effect.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Muninn
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: Kharron
Assuming the opponent refered to was HRC, would information gathering be illegal? What if the information sought had to do with the Uranium 1 deal?
Learn the FACTS on the Uranium thing.
Enlighten us then.
Do not use wrong/mis-information to try to make a point.
Of course and has been duping you poor souls with diagnosed TAD, its been hilarious to see you people wrong at every turn.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: Kharron
This is all part of Trump's 4d chess y'all. He trolling y'all. Benghazi, Podesta, Obama.