It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sprockets2000
a reply to: Kharron
Yeah thats a big nothing burger you got there and I think you know it.
But lets say you Marxist get your way, what then, are you going to be prepared for the violent war that will come next, do you think we will ever accept any of your leaders?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron
This is fun!
I can't wait to accuse every leftist candidate of treason the next time they look at opposition research!
*giggles and claps hands*
we now know straight from the President's mouth that the meeting was not about the adoption of children but rather what everyone already knew -- an exchange of political dirt for political favors.
We can now deduce that in exchange for most likely promising to do a favor and work on taking down the Magnitsky Act, political dirt on HRC was offered in exchange. Perhaps more than just dirt? Assistance?
What will DJT do if Don Jr. gets arrested?
What do you call an act like this -- "Hey, you help me get elected and I help you with dismantling the legislature that is hurting your country?"
Will he come clean to protect his family and accept the blame? What if Cohen is being truthful that he knows DJT knew about the meeting ahead of time? That would make him accomplice to said conspiracy.
Can someone who actually likes DJT and is close to him please take his phone away before he does something worse than incriminate himself? I think his phone should be classified as a weapon of mass destruction.
It is also indisputably a direct and illegal act of working with a Foreign Government to benefit a US Presidential Campaign.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
It has been obvious since the day the emails were released that the purpose of the meeting was to get dirt.
52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a)ProhibitionIt shall be unlawful for—
(1)a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A)a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
That's some hefty spin, you're now saying you know what was discussed? Or did your reading comprehension fail you and you misunderstood what trump meant when he said the meeting went nowhere?
We have no evidence that would suggest such a quid pro quo, nor is it logical to deduce that. If you believe it is, please explain your logical steps.
Pardon him. As any good father would.
No, any good father would have taught his son or daughter how not to be a lying scum bag in the first place.
originally posted by: F4guy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron
This is fun!
I can't wait to accuse every leftist candidate of treason the next time they look at opposition research!
*giggles and claps hands*
If, and only if, the assistance with the research came from a foreign entity, you would be correct. Look at Title 52 of the U.S. Code.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xpert11
How was the dossier a contributor to the campaign. It's a collection of memos.