It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

page: 99
140
<< 96  97  98    100  101  102 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: CADpro
a reply to: toysforadults

Seriously, I don't understand how mods allow what we see going on. All we would like to do is discuss Q.

True. I've read that warning the mods post here every few days. There's a part that says "Forum gangs or the illusion of a special group will not be tolerated." I sure wish they'd deal with the forum gang that is intentionally trying to stop us from discussing the subject of this thread.


I think one challenge today is that the thread about Q being a prank from the left was shut down and we were all told to come here....




posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Cranky (and Sabre!),

I've just noted a significant tie between Q Posts #1822 and #1824 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub - regarding "knowingly"!

RELEVANT PARTS of posts:
#1822

Fake News collaborating and pushing knowingly false information?
Fake News ‘KNOWINGLY FALSE’ narrative pushes.


#1824

President's 'knowingly' [unequally] distribute

(Bold emphases mine)

In #1822 Fake News agents 'knowingly' push false narratives.
In #1824 BHOs operatives 'knowingly' distribute unequally wealth.

I think this links back to the diagrams of MSM reporters as the nucleus of deep state cells, giving FBI etc. their orders.

Is Q saying that MSM cell heads also direct where the wealth goes?

Why "knowingy"? Because in that cell structure, it is only the MSM reporters at the nucleus who know the whole story?


That would make a lot of sense, We all know who they work for. They're talking points directly affect in a lot of cases, which direction the cash flows. Run a hit piece on a certain CEO/CO., people sell they're stocks. Run a good piece on CEO/CO stocks are bought. Do a hit piece on a certain Airline company/cruise ship people choose another company. On and on, they certainly can persuade where the money goes.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:07 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


(post by Gandalf77 removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Whereismypassword

Has it? Can you show me definitively where it was proven NOT to be Obama, because it sure does look like him to me. Even has his homeboy from Chicago standing right next to him. Also, the chicks Facebook page who made it comments on his “grace and elegance” while wearing said get up.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:09 PM
link   
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
edit on Tue Aug 7 2018 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Gandalf77

REACH much? LOL I guess we will find out soon enough as the Manafort Trial is in process. Wait for Rod Rosenstein to get called to the stand



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Thanks Rel (I assume everyone calls you Rel). Will mind those T&C's !



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Whereismypassword

Has it? Can you show me definitively where it was proven NOT to be Obama, because it sure does look like him to me. Even has his homeboy from Chicago standing right next to him. Also, the chicks Facebook page who made it comments on his “grace and elegance” while wearing said get up.



Oh dear

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Its Michel Madie from Burning Man.

Linky Link

Not sure why an instagram post saying "grace and elegance" would suggest Obama to you.
edit on 7-8-2018 by seyance because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Gandalf77

WRONG.

Many who support truth are interested in understanding what Q is about.

I am the furthest thing from right wing.

MANY many lefties are joining #walkaway

We are all kinds of people just seeking #Truth





posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Whereismypassword

Has it? Can you show me definitively where it was proven NOT to be Obama, because it sure does look like him to me. Even has his homeboy from Chicago standing right next to him. Also, the chicks Facebook page who made it comments on his “grace and elegance” while wearing said get up.



Oh dear

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Can you tell me why Obama’s former boy toy Arthur Davis is pictured with this guy?



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: Gandalf77

WRONG.

Many who support truth are interested in understanding what Q is about.

I am the furthest thing from right wing.

MANY many lefties are joining #walkaway

We are all kinds of people just seeking #Truth





Walkway is a Russian operation 🐸



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ItsNotRelevant

Boom! This is spot on!


(post by Gandalf77 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: seyance

See now that is a real debunk!

Not just someone's opinion.

Thanks for that.

I stand corrected that it was an Obama pic.

I will remove it.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gandalf77
POST REMOVED BY STAFF


Keep telling yourself that, guy. You actually think that people are not abandoning the Democratic Party in droves?
edit on Tue Aug 7 2018 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Where is your proof that they are "leaving in droves "?



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: seyance
a reply to: pavil

What you consider "normal banter" could be considered trolling and spam by those not involved. The same labels you throw at any "debunkers" who post off-topic, maybe they consider it merely "banter".

That is why the gang mentality gets thrown about.

Its only off-topic if its posted by a denier, Q researchers are allowed to "banter".



IMO, stop complaining about others posting or quit posting off-topic "banter".


You immediately start with a false assumption. I can and do have "banter" with some here that don't buy into this Q phenomena. This is a high strung thread with strong opinions. There are some here i've tried to discuss things and it goes nowhere so I've tuned them out. Nothing personal, its just not productive dialog, if you even want to call it that. Both sides talk at each other, rather than to each other. I'm sure it's frustrating on both sides, hence the lumping everything Q related to this one thread becomes counterproductive sometimes.

One side of this discussion is going to end up more "correct" than the other when this is all said and done this Fall. I doubt anyone will be changing their minds barring some really big revelations till then.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 03:36 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
140
<< 96  97  98    100  101  102 >>

log in

join