It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

page: 311
140
<< 308  309  310    312  313  314 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: EnigmaChaser

It was literally the lesser of two evils. To think that he was part of a decades old plan to end the deep state is outrageous.




posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 12:33 AM
link   
I've just had a theory materialise on the Podesta's paintings and MK Ultra.

I don't think it's been discussed before but feel free to correct me.


Firstly, we have learnt from this thread that MK Ultra was used to programme children, ideally from the age of eight. Also that this was achieved by frightening them "out of their skins" to the state where they create multiple personalities to escape the pain of bad memories. Once this was achieved the alternate personalities were programmed.

To date I had assumed that those personalities were programmed either to kill or to become famous film/music personalities.

What if those the cabal wanted in power were programmed from the age of eight to rise to the positions they now hold? Those individuals continue to be controlled via the MSM cells that Q laid out for us. They can be controlled with trigger words from the "4am talking points" etc. by trigger words.

Now let's re-look at the Podesta art collection style!

The items included in Q posts are of children around the age of eight in 40s to 60s style underwear. The recent pool pics indicate that the pictures show the children in the pool at Biltmore house run by the Vanderbilts on a 99 year lease from the Payseurs. We are all led to believe that GROUPS of children were in that empty pool and that possibly dogs were used to murder one or more. White rabbits signify innocence and dogs are used in hare coursing to kill hares.

John Podesta would have been 8 in 1957. Tony Podesta would have been eight in 1951.

WHAT IF PODESTAS ART ACTUALLY PORTRAYS HIM AND HIS BROTHER/FELLOW MK ULTRA VICTIMS? Portrayed, I would guess, just before witnessing one of their group dying, which started the rest's programming?

Therefore when he looks at the art he is remembering both his innocence and the event which drove his life and his fellow inductees?

Let's take this a STEP further... what if the red shoes are worn both to remember this event, where they presumably had to walk in the blood, and as a signpost to others of who has been through this programming?





edit on 22-8-2018 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 12:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon


The President knows even more than we do about past and present deep-state criminal activity. Knowing his action-oriented personality, there's NO WAY Donald Trump would just sit around and be hammered, while Sessions does nothing.

There must be a plan that's being implemented behind the scenes by at least Sessions/Huber, and perhaps involving top military and FBI leaders too.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 12:47 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




There must be a plan





posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

The problem with your theory is that Podesta doesn't own all the pool paintings. The whole thing started because a magazine featured an article where one of the paintings by that artist, a girl on a stool with green and white tiles, can be seen.

There is no proof, that I have seen, that he owns any other paintings by that artist, Biljana Djurdjevic, or what they could even be.



edit on 22-8-2018 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage


Peter Pan vs President Trump?
Bring it on Peter!
LOL.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:21 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Trump as Hook?
Sure. Why not?
Evil as hell.

Is Mueller the croc? Tick Tock.



edit on 8/22/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:41 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

The problem with the response is that you don't identify which either of them do own, and who owns the others. For all we know they could be being used as a laptop wallpaper.

I'm unwilling to get dragged into provenance of paintings as it may get into Ts&Cs violations, though eventually it would be interesting to know who commissioned them.

Happy to go with an interim premise that they do not

own all the pool paintings
, as the rest of the theory is still relevant for discussion.


edit on 22-8-2018 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:43 AM
link   
Its good to reference old statements made by Deep-State vs. Team Trump and compare them to current reality.
It's the easiest way to explore "future proves past" and see which sources are credible and which ones lie.

Giuliani: Trump more likely to meet Kim Jong Un than Robert Mueller

This was said after the summit with Kim was "cancelled" and MSM were saying it would never take place...which it then did.


(post by pheonix358 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:51 AM
link   
To think that the crimes of Cohen and Manafort are going to be the end of Trump, is desperate wishful thinking. Their crimes simply point out that Trump was right in firing them. More likely they were Deep State plants. Regardless of plants or not, since they cant prove Russian Collusion they have to prove Manafort tax fraud and Cohen pay-offs. The more vindictive and desperate "the resistance" gets, the more I trust the plan and enjoy the show.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating
Trump did not fire Manafort and he continues to refer to him as a "good guy."


edit on 8/22/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 01:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Skyfloating
Trump did not fire Manafort and he continues to refer to him as a "good guy."



Time Magazine: How Trump hired and fired Manafort

Ugh...why do I even bother replying. Waste of time.
edit on 2018 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

Time is a liberal rag.

You believe the MSM?

Oh, I see, when it supports your paradigm that's fine.
www.vox.com...

edit on 8/22/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
The problem with the response is that you don't identify which either of them do own, and who owns the others.

Actually it does. It says that we only know that he owns that one painting by Biljana Djurdjevic.

Looking at other pieces by the same artist really doesn't bolster your theory if you can't place them in Podesta's collection.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

As I've pointed out they don't need to own the paintings to view them - anyone can have a copy or a laptop wallpaper... and that's only one aspect of the theory. There is this source that a Podesta collects the artist's work.

The article states that:

Though his collection stands at 792 works
...

only about 10 percent is displayed at any one time in the house


he has donated more than 1300 pieces


prefers to buy from the same artists once he establishes that he likes their work



ETA 2 of the paintings were bought at auction by Susan Goodman; who just happens to be on the The Armory Show Centennial Committee alongside Tony Podesta.


edit on 22-8-2018 by RelSciHistItSufi because: eta



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating


Assuming this is accurate:



Despite the media hype it is not a campaign contribution for a candidate to instruct his attorney to pay-off a nuisance claim to avoid any issues or embarrassment. It is not a campaign donation for Donald Trump to reimburse his attorney for paying the claim.

♦The issue of the Cohen payment being an “in kind” campaign contribution is the bottom line question which underpins the charge.

There is no FEC rule or law that says a candidate cannot pay-off an accuser to avoid further issues, a nuisance claim. Paying an accuser to avoid controversy or embarrassment, is no different than a candidate buying an American made car -with personal funds- to gain the beneficial public optics of not driving a foreign car. Neither expense example makes the payment an aspect of am “in kind” campaign contribution.

There is no connected claim that President Trump used campaign funds to repay his attorney for eliminating the nuisance claim. President Trump, a businessman, used his own business income to repay his attorney; an attorney on a monthly retainer.

The entire charge of Cohen making a campaign contribution, or campaign finance violation, is a manufactured claim, made only by the SDNY, for political benefit.
theconservativetreehouse.com... ere-the-media-focus/#more-153144

How can the charge of a federal campaign finance violation be legally valid? Is there no "Federal Campaign Finance Rules" document? The SDNY prosecutors can't just make up laws, and say someone violated them.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:38 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

That is the article I was talking about. It only shows that one painting by her.

"Prefers" doesn't mean he has bought more from her or that it was the pool paintings even if he did, which is what your theory is based on.

Even if we are just going to go by what he can get on the net then you still don't know if he even likes the pool paintings and has them as the wallpaper of his computer or printed out and carries them in his wallet. It is all just conjecture.



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:39 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Is there no "Federal Campaign Finance Rules" document?
transition.fec.gov...



posted on Aug, 22 2018 @ 02:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

Is there no "Federal Campaign Finance Rules" document?
transition.fec.gov...


Thanks. It looks like paying "hush money" is legal, since that document doesn't address it.



new topics

top topics



 
140
<< 308  309  310    312  313  314 >>

log in

join