It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

page: 302
140
<< 299  300  301    303  304  305 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 11:38 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik



That is why I mentioned those dots. Because people say "coincidence?", well no , not if things didn't even happen that way.


You can downplay your original quote all you want by saying "metioned those dots", but your actual reply was:



It's these little false connected dots that makes me wonder how people can say they are doing honest digging.


The dysphemism, "these little false connected dots" is a tell. You didn't simply mention the dots, you used it as evidence in the court of your own opinion to cast the defendant as a liar, not someone who made a mistake when recalling facts. There was no deciet intended in the original statement regrding the red scarf, but there certainly is was conciet in the response.

You get the final word. I've not been constructive tonight.




posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 11:45 PM
link   
The forgotten story of how Robert Mueller let David Asimov (son of Isaac Asimov) walk free


David Asimov, son of celebrity science fiction author Isaac Asimov, amassed one of the most gigantic child porn libraries in American history, and the largest ever found in California. But Robert Mueller, as the U.S. Attorney responsible for prosecuting the case, let Asimov walk free. Santa Rosa police arrested the younger Asimov in 1998 after discovering the gigantic collection of child pornography.



edit on 2018 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 20 2018 @ 11:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: CoramDeo
You can downplay your original quote all you want by saying "metioned those dots", but your actual reply was:


It's these little false connected dots that makes me wonder how people can say they are doing honest digging.

Sure, that is exactly what I said.


The dysphemism, "these little false connected dots" is a tell. You didn't simply mention the dots, you used it as evidence in the court of your own opinion to cast the defendant as a liar, not someone who made a mistake when recalling facts. There was no deciet intended in the original statement regrding the red scarf, but there certainly is was conciet in the response.

Yes, in response to the previous post. How dare I "cherry pick the minor mistakes of researchers". It even said I didn't need to answer.

I just took that and threw it back with the same tone. Those "minor mistakes of researchers" are "little false connected dot's" that should be called out, if we are being honest.

ETA: My bad, I didn't post that after the cherry picking accusation. It was actually before but after the line in the post I originally replied to:

And you are trying to tell me there is no pattern, no club, and nothing more to see here?

That got me thinking, yeah, especially if the pattern is made up of things that happened a different way. Same feel though.


You get the final word. I've not been constructive tonight.

Don't worry, we are doing CADpro a solid. They are antsy for the next thread.
edit on 21-8-2018 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: carewemust

Looking at the page, it actually sounds like someone, whoever wrote the page, is trying to put her down for failing to know the doc and info was fake.

She was an advisor to the Trump campaign, but at the moment with the info given, she could have thought she was doing the right thing. Consider the info that was left out.

Most of those were signed before the info came out about abuse.

Seems there would be more to her bio than just that one point.


You may be confusing the confusing wording in that wiki.

I think the "Adviser" they refer to is Carter Page.

Judge Conway approved a 2017 FISA Court warrant for Carter Page, a former adviser to the 2016 Trump Campaign.


Also I love this IRONY:


Other service
Conway serves on the board of advisers for the Center for Governmental Responsibility at the University of Florida.


😃😃

Anne C. Conway



No, it was the extended quote on the particular subject that struck me.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:11 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

No offense to Mr. Couch, but I doubt he has any assets to go after, even if she were to sue for damages.

Suing someone who you can never collect from isn't a very sound tactic. Even if he were to retract it...... the damn genie is out of the internet bottle. Good Luck getting it back in there.

It would have been far better for her to ignore such a "tinfoil" "Alt-right Conspiracy Theorist". It would have played far better.

Never said they were smart....................


There's no way she cares about the money.. It is 100% about trying to control the information. Like you said it is out there now, and in my opinion she is only drawing more attention to it. Too late now...

For humanity's sake, I hope she wasn't capable of any wrongdoing in that situation. Especially for political reasons, or for any reason for that matter.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

This story has been driving me crazy.

They seized 4000 tapes from this guy who had film reproduction equipment in his house. He was obviously mass distributing.

So where are the tapes?

They were never sourced for missing children.

Just locked away in evidence somewhere.

I keep hoping this case is back in the spotlight because someone is going to look at those tapes.

Oh and the guy should be in jail.

Obviously they couldn't do that because he could take down so many with him.
edit on 21 by tiredoflooking because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

I keep hoping this case is back in the spotlight


I did my part



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:19 AM
link   
New Q drop



Linky



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Trillium




posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:35 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Ask yourself why the 514th National Guard Deployment to Guantanamo is getting top-shelf security escorts to their post. For the same reason the GOP train was derailed by a garbage truck on the train tracks. Saboatge could happen. Q stuff is heating up and the Boss babies are getting their undies in a bunch. WWG1WGA! #BOOM!



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 12:48 AM
link   
Lisa Barsoomian was mentioned on thread one back in december

and dig this article on how she was the legal fixer for all things spook related



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

1:98­cv­01459­TPJ HAMBURG v. CLINTON

Looks like a PACER search for the DC Circuit Courts.

Interestingly, not a single search result for Barsoomian, including external sources enabled when searching WL.

The above is not very useable, except to show there is a record.

The purge was presumably regrding all court records. That may be the case, haven't look into it, yet.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 01:14 AM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

All purged in the name of national security.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 01:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: CoramDeo

All purged in the name of national security.


I'm not quite sure.

When I go to the DC Circuit Court Appellate E-Filing System C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts, and try to search by date, the earliest year on the list is 2008.

I'm also not sure I'm entering the docket number correctly, but it wouldn't matter if it doesn't show the years 1998-99.

Maybe there is another way to search, i.e.-PACER, which should show it, but that system doesn't. I know the PA court search open to the public goes back to at least 1999, the last time I got a speeding ticket.

It seems odd that the DC courts would only go back to 2008, but then, it's freaking DC.

The whole "purged" thing sounds like a load of crap to me. Al Hamburg on the other hand, seems like a piece of work. Here is a little biography written by what looks like his son as a blog entry. Other articles paint him as sort of a crazy old man who sues a bunch.

I'm thinking that line of exploration is a dead issue. Not misinformation, wrong information.


edit on 21-8-2018 by CoramDeo because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 01:49 AM
link   
Interesting.

Nancy Messonnier, MD (CAPT, USPHS, RET) Director, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), is Lisa Barsoomian's sister-in-law.

It looks like the Brother-in-Law, Mark L. Messonnier, PhD, presumably RR's brother, has his hand in the CDC cookie jar as well.

Not sure if any of that ties in to anything, but I thought I'd throw it out there.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 02:07 AM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

That makes me more nervous than anything.

The right people in the right place to (as an example only) stuff up the response to a virulent plague and do some population reduction.

All one has to do is connect the relationships to see the tentacles of the deep state.

I wonder how many have nonrefundable booking at GITMO.

P



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 02:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: pheonix358
I wonder how many have nonrefundable booking at GITMO.

Probably none but you might hear, we are out of medication for that itch you got. You might want to put some calamine on it.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 02:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Trillium


WOW.. Q Drop #1931 is DEEP. Q himself might be the inside source who connected the dots.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 02:53 AM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

You don't think that GOP train collision with the garbage truck was an accident? I haven't seen an additional theories floating around.



posted on Aug, 21 2018 @ 03:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
WOW.. Q Drop #1931 is DEEP. Q himself might be the inside source who connected the dots.

What are you talking about? Q said no outside comms and lonestarbeliever, the author of that post, sounds nothing like Q.

Although I wouldn't put it past Q.



new topics

top topics



 
140
<< 299  300  301    303  304  305 >>

log in

join