It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

page: 101
140
<< 98  99  100    102  103  104 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Gandalf77



Manafort's trial is to establish his means and motive for reaching out to Russia during the campaign.


That's probably the most ill-informed statement I've read today.

What is Manafort on trial for?
When did these crimes occur?
When did Trump run for president?
When and for how long, was Manafort part of the campaign?

There's all kinds of stories about this subject. Wee-dogggie. I didn't know he was so popular...

Here's How the Government Plans to Take Down Paul Manafort

I hope that source doesn't lean to far right or left for you.

Be well, citizen.




posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Rel, has anything you've decoded from Q posts ever led you to something before it broke?

It strikes me that the message or decode you conclude to is still vague enough that Q could of just posted it himself. Why the extra level of cryptic code, doesn't this exclude Q / Trump supporters from learning something.

How does it not divide its own base?

My point is... what is the point of it? My only conclusion could be that these decodes enforce the idea that Q has insider information and reinforces his drops.

However it feels counter productive to have codes inside of codes when you are trying to unite a base.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

In my humble opinion, the qproof site is a speculative site. It's not an authoritative tell-all but, it's a good place to go get your cognitive wheels greased. Isn't it wonderful that you can go there and come away with your brain still in-tact? That's the freedom to think, Mr. Anarchist.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:09 PM
link   
a reply to: CanadianMason

Is it okay if I call you Leaf Bro from now on?

That was some good stuff, sir.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: Gandalf77



Manafort's trial is to establish his means and motive for reaching out to Russia during the campaign.


That's probably the most ill-informed statement I've read today.

What is Manafort on trial for?
When did these crimes occur?
When did Trump run for president?
When and for how long, was Manafort part of the campaign?

There's all kinds of stories about this subject. Wee-dogggie. I didn't know he was so popular...

Here's How the Government Plans to Take Down Paul Manafort

I hope that source doesn't lean to far right or left for you.

Be well, citizen.


Been at the orange Kool-Aid today?
It should be pretty easy to see how this trial and the next play into a larger strategy on Mueller's part, but I guess I shouldn't presume any 4D thinking in a thread full of Q moonies.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:12 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Gandalf77




Where 9/11 is concerned, Mueller is widely credited--by members of BOTH parties--for reforming and improving the FBI.


This is true. He garners high praise from both sides.

James Comes (Republican?)-Approve
James Clapper- (Communist)-Approve

I might have taken some liberties in the overall sampling...

Margin of error-100%

edit on 7-8-2018 by CoramDeo because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

Oh yeah, and not everyone has such a glowing opinion of Mueller. I wish I had the link handy for the document that a member of congress wrote detailing how much of a snake Mueller has been his entire career. I’m sure someone here knows what I’m talking about and possibly has the link.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Whereismypassword

You’re absolutely terrified man. But keep watching CNN!

edit on 7-8-2018 by PurpleFox because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Grassley did a huge op ed a couple of weeks ago. I'm not able to look it up right now.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: daskakik

The fact remains that


Lets see.


has woken millions upon millions of people up to the sick reality of the world we live in;

Not a Fact

Q hasn't really hit the level of Flat Earther's yet.

Just like the MSM manipulates its viewers into the reality around them, Q manipulates his followers in thinkings its bigger than it is.

How many Q signs do you think were at the Tampa rally?
How many were positioned exactly behind the MSM cameras?
Why? Who positioned them?

The MSM is controlling the narrative.
Why were Q signs subsequently banned?
Trump does not want to be associated with Q.
Why?

This Q movement is a fraction of the Trump supporters base... it will divide the base.

Trump has to try and balance it without losing supporters. He can't denounce Q and he won't support Q.

This is my take.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Grassley did a huge op ed a couple of weeks ago. I'm not able to look it up right now.


There's a reliable source...



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:20 PM
link   
Hey Pokey. In case you missed it.


originally posted by: seyance
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Oh my bad. I assumed you had some sort of proof. Your attitude seemed to suggest as such.

Do you still think its Obama in the photo?



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gandalf77

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: Gandalf77



Manafort's trial is to establish his means and motive for reaching out to Russia during the campaign.


That's probably the most ill-informed statement I've read today.

What is Manafort on trial for?
When did these crimes occur?
When did Trump run for president?
When and for how long, was Manafort part of the campaign?

There's all kinds of stories about this subject. Wee-dogggie. I didn't know he was so popular...

Here's How the Government Plans to Take Down Paul Manafort

I hope that source doesn't lean to far right or left for you.

Be well, citizen.


Been at the orange Kool-Aid today?
It should be pretty easy to see how this trial and the next play into a larger strategy on Mueller's part, but I guess I shouldn't presume any 4D thinking in a thread full of Q moonies.


Well, lay it out then.

I'll go polish my monster dragster and fry up some squirrel while you whip up a 4.1D thefaecus explaining the brilliance of this case.

Please. And remember to source it your work.

The hens like it when I read out loud.

Be well, citizen.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:26 PM
link   
Lisa Mei's tweet:

twitter.com...



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:27 PM
link   
People are equating Q drops with the discussions by Q-sters that follow the crumbs.

Try this, if you are really sincere about finding the pieces to the Big Picture puzzle:

*Don't read the discussions. Tune them out.
*Sit down with Q drops only.
*Start with what we think may have been the first one (Oct. 28 I think), or begin even with the first Trip Code drop.
*Don't be tempted to join discussions. Merely, read the drops, create your map, research the links, connect your dots.

If you're not willing to dig for the treasure of Truth, then you don't deserve it. But, screaming and belittling the people that are doing the hard work just reveals your fear and hate.

Ask yourself, when you are feeling that fear, whether it was an individual anon that stated something, or was it Q. If it was Q, there is usually proofs and verifiable links to follow up. If it was an anon, take it with a grain of salt and do your own digging.


edit on 7-8-2018 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Joecanada11




posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Gandalf77




posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Fine, but the drops themselves have been full of failed predictions, false information and Dog-whistling



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 04:31 PM
link   
Sure, it’s not Obama. Is that what you want to hear? I’m still not 100% sold. I see the guy from Burning Man, I’ll give you that. When all this came out did they not have the artist saying that she created 2 of these head dresses? Also, that guy in the pic looks a lot like Arthur Davis. Guess it’s just a coincidence. A guy in a Chicago jacket that looks exactly like Davis, and another guy who looks like Obama under a mask taking a pic together.



new topics

top topics



 
140
<< 98  99  100    102  103  104 >>

log in

join