posted on Feb, 28 2005 @ 01:06 AM
I didn't want to start a new thread and this is the most recent type of thread like this I could remember.
If you have no friggin proof to support something don't let you biased agenda towards what you're trying to "prove" show. I just went through a
plethora of chemtrail threads shattered by Howard Roark and off_the_street. Then I open a 9/11 thread shattered by those same two. Then a moon
"hoax" thread. Yet people - quite often people who are either Bush or America critics grasping at junk science and strawmen to "prove" or to use
a better phrase, rub our repsective American noses in that "land of the free - haha
" type of tone.
Having no credible evidence, no scientific fact, nothing to go on but a dislike for the President or America(ns) in general is NOT by any flipping
means a good argument. Because you
personally believe everything the USA/Bush does is inherently evil does not
make it so.
That's where the "bias" cry comes from. People that treat Jeff Rense as a valid source because he says what they want to hear
are the reason
for this. If you look at something with an objective eye you find the truth quicker than not. And I hope that's what most ATS'ers are looking for:
Anyone can find a "link" through google to support or debunk anything
. And I'll even add myself to this: some of us
do need to get a #ing grip
And I'll edit to add that you can turn those situations around and add conservative/American/Bush supporter to it - just because I anticipate that
kind of response.
[edit on (2/28/0505 by PistolPete]