Is it me or does this seem to be what we discussed months ago

This article popped up for me and it reads like whomever wrote it may have taken it from ATS from discussions months ago about all these connections.

Please read:

Article

As various commentators predicted would be proven, the bulk of the information that formed the basis for the FISA warrant applications was the “dossier” of allegations about Donald Trump’s activities in Russia. This dossier was provided to the FBI by British spy Christopher Steele. Steele was hired during the 2016 presidential campaign by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, who was paid by Hillary Clinton’s law firm Perkins Coie, who was paid by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The allegations were scandalous and completely unverified, in violation of federal statutes and FISA court rules.


In other words, the FBI used oppo research paid for by the Democrats as justification for government spying on a political opponent and other Americans.

But there’s more. In another incredible coincidence, Fusion GPS had hired scholar and professor Nellie Ohr as a “paid Russian expert.” Nellie Ohr happens to be married to Bruce Ohr, deputy attorney general in the Justice Department. Bruce Ohr is alleged to have passed his wife’s anti-Trump research to the FBI. He was demoted for failing to disclose not only his wife’s employment with Fusion GPS, but also his own meetings with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson.

The FISA court was never told any of that. They were never supposed to know. None of us was ever supposed to know.

Anyone else get that vibe?

And I have no idea about the validity of the source...just asking about the story itself relating to posts here a while back.

a reply to: Vasa Croe


The Boston Herald finally worked up the nerve to print what it, and most of us who follow these crimes, have known for months. On a positive note, it's refreshing to finally see a big-city newspaper stop hiding from actual facts...from what really happened.

The Wall Street Journal climbed onboard today as well...

Did the Central Intelligence Agency lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation down a rabbit hole in the counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign?

Although the FBI’s case officially began July 31, 2016, there had been investigative activity before that date. John Brennan’s CIA might have directed activity in Britain, which could be a problem because of longstanding agreements that the U.S. will not conduct intelligence operations there. It would explain why the FBI continues to stonewall Congress as to the inquiry’s origin.

Further, what we know about the case’s origin does not meet the threshold required by the attorney general guidelines for opening a counterintelligence case. That standard requires “predicate information,” or “articulable facts.”

Continued at: www.wsj.com...

a reply to: Vasa Croe


Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.

The democratic party reminds me of humpty.

Looks like Trumps 4D chess is paying off, and with the left besieged with TDS they can't even see it coming.

Yup. And you don't need Watson to help you deduce who had Seth Rich iced as well.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Have you noticed that it's not a big deal anymore? Sure it's exactly what most have been saying for a while, but since it's gone for so long unpunished, it would be a shame to hurt anyone's feelings at this stage of the game.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

I get that vibe regularly. I've seen actual ideas and words on here that coincidently appear on other blogs and from the mouths of newscasters.

I'm aware that what we can think of, they can think of too, but still, sometimes it's jaw dropping.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

You're right.

We've been pretty much spot-on from the very beginning - from the fact that it was a general inquiry NOT targeting the President specifically (despite liberal lies/MSM spin) to the fact that no conspiracy/crimes would be found.

The left has been wrong in every far-fetched overreaching theory they espoused (always in a matter-of-fact, foregone conclusion type way)

In short, they've been wrong. Completely and utterly wrong.

Manafort didn't "flip" (he has nothing to "flip" with)
Trump Jr/Kushner wasn't indicted
The President won't be impeached/indicted
...literally none of the bizarre allegations they made turned out to be true

Can't really hold it against their followers, since they are effectively brainwashed. However, Democrat leaders are now on record making complete fools of themselves (think Schiff, Waters, etc) making completely unfounded claims of "collusion" proof.

We should drive this home in the midterms to ensure our country realizes that entrusting these psychopaths with ANY power whatsoever would be a critical mistake for our country.

It's never about the evidence.
It is always about "the seriousness of the charge".

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vasa Croe


The Boston Herald finally worked up the nerve to print what it, and most of us who follow these crimes, have known for months. On a positive note, it's refreshing to finally see a big-city newspaper stop hiding from actual facts...from what really happened.

People are going to start realizing who are the good and bad guys. We have establishment republicans and democrats, entrenched in the system, and then we have Trump. The only dog in town big enough and mean enough and powerful enough, and patriotic enough to stand up against the Swamp and rally the troops!

EVERY DAY that goes by, it's harder and harder to remain a Democrat. Or you may stay a Democrat but you will not vote democrat. Trump is not a Republican anyway, he just knew you have to pick one of the two in order to become POTUS. It's the only way. He may as well run in 2020 under The Trump Party! 👍🏼