It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Apparently 'globalist' is Now an Anti-Semitic Slur?

page: 5
30
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 09:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

ILLEGAL immigration. Get a clue.

Are they many white skinned illegals pouring into America?


I'm impressed that you put it that way, but no I'm not aware of a huge influx of illegal white immigrants.

Are you making a case for white supremacy? Because you sound like you're making a case for white supremacy.





posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: dug88
So I wasn't sure the best place to post this but I figure this may get heated so.... anyway i was reading through some comments on an article on another site and I got to a comment that had bren almost universally downvoted by everybody. The comment didn't seem too controversial it just mentioned globalism. I kept reading the comments below...people were getting pissed off calling the person a Nazi, saying they're anti-Semitic and that globalist is actually an anti-Semitic codeword for Jew....i'd never heard this before.

So I looked it up and apparently...

www.realclearpolitics.com...


m.huffpost.com...

And well on and on the results go. So i'm confused as # here...

As far as I know globalism is a political philosophy that has to do with open borders and a lack of sovereign nations and absolutely nothing at all to do with Jewish people or religion. So did I miss something here? Because, it seems to me, like a pretty good way to make anyone who complains or comments upon an increasingly globalized world being taken over by giant completely unaccountablr multinational corporations become immediately derided and silenced.


Your definition of globalism is exactly correct...It's interesting that globalists are in general anti-Israel...Globalists would love to see Israel over run by the Palestinians and other Arabs...It's funny to watch these loonies come to the defense of Soros and his ilk who are Jewish but hate Israel at the same time...Soros is a globalist who happens to be Jewish...So because we don't like Soros, we are anti-Semite...

Obama is a globalist...Obama is black...So we are racists because we don't like Obama's globalist beliefs...

They are looking for ways to stifle our speech so uninformed Democrats won't wake up to the fact that these globalists are anti-America...



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
The world is already run by globalist, to think that globalism is some kind of threat we should avoid is to ignore the fact that globalists already have control over the world and have for quite some time.

One huge contributing factor to the world devolving into a ****hole. The people running the show would rather see millions starve than actually end silly little things like famine and disease. Globalists...
*pfft*



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jefferton

originally posted by: visitedbythem
a reply to: olaru12

I agree. All progressives should be thrown out of the country, withe a swift kick in the ass

And then, after we kick them all out, then we will kick out the more progressive of the leftovers, THEN, the more progressive of those leftovers...

THEN...





Then the nation will no longer be divided, and Im sure Mexico will be glad to take them in. Then we could all have a national holiday to celebrate, Festivals, and parties everywhere, and all kinds of good food!



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thejoncrichton
There is definitely an assault on language by the left going on. They keep redefining words to suit their agenda.


I think they redefined redefining too, redefining is ok if you are a liberal but not if you are a conservative.



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: dug88
So I wasn't sure the best place to post this but I figure this may get heated so.... anyway i was reading through some comments on an article on another site and I got to a comment that had bren almost universally downvoted by everybody. The comment didn't seem too controversial it just mentioned globalism. I kept reading the comments below...people were getting pissed off calling the person a Nazi, saying they're anti-Semitic and that globalist is actually an anti-Semitic codeword for Jew....i'd never heard this before.

So I looked it up and apparently...

www.realclearpolitics.com...

Those espousing that idea are THEMSELVES, ANTISEMITIC. "Globalist" has NEVER been about Jews, as a term.

By saying it's Antisemitic, they are saying that only Jews are globalists, or that globalists are all Jews. Neither of things is even remotely true.




m.huffpost.com...

And well on and on the results go. So i'm confused as # here...

As far as I know globalism is a political philosophy that has to do with open borders and a lack of sovereign nations and absolutely nothing at all to do with Jewish people or religion. So did I miss something here? Because, it seems to me, like a pretty good way to make anyone who complains or comments upon an increasingly globalized world being taken over by giant completely unaccountablr multinational corporations become immediately derided and silenced.



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: visitedbythem
a reply to: olaru12

I agree. All progressives should be thrown out of the country, withe a swift kick in the ass



How do you identify a progressive. We need to know before we round them all up and throw them out.
When we catch them we can sew a yellow "P" on their coat sleeve.



That's an easy one! Just organize a protest against our own country and give out free pink hats.


It would be easier to get the voter role and kick everyone out that didn't vote Trump. You can't trust the anti-Trumpets, they're liars.



I'm with you!!!

Should we start with the black or brown people.


Libtards are not defined by skin colour.

Next.


It's scary how they literally can't talk about anything without thinking about skin color.





Actually it's a fair comment, it's the conservatives always going on about immigration, which translates to "stop letting brown people in" ... It's as plain as day for anyone paying attention...


Except that's left-wing propaganda. Conservatives problem with illegal immigration has nothing to do with skin color. That's something progressives had to invent to pretend it's racist to not be okay with rampant illegal immigration. It's easier to just cry "racist" than to actually debate the issue.

Good job.





Can you show me where all these white illegal immigrants are coming in an stealing American jobs ?... I didn't think so...
edit on 30-7-2018 by hopenotfeariswhatweneed because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 10:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

ILLEGAL immigration. Get a clue.

Are they many white skinned illegals pouring into America?


I'm impressed that you put it that way, but no I'm not aware of a huge influx of illegal white immigrants.

Are you making a case for white supremacy? Because you sound like you're making a case for white supremacy.







No I'm making a case for some conservatives hating on brown people... Like I said its blatantly obvious... Oh and I'm constantly impressing myself...

edit on 30-7-2018 by hopenotfeariswhatweneed because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: dug88

This is just so much crap. And Don Lemon is a Cultural Marxist Leftist Progressive who likes to take twisted definitions and refer to the new variant definition as a code word. Its basically what the Marxists do with language; twist it to their agenda to out their enemies.

See "Globalism": en.wikipedia.org...

If you want to understand and know how the term "Globalist" is used and what it refers to see:
www.globalistagenda.org...

Better yet, see how the Globalists themselves define their movement:

www.theglobalist.com...


A globalist, in short, is anyone dedicated to figuring out how the world hangs together. That includes sorting out the dynamic political and social changes associated with globalization, questioning them rigorously and seeking to correct them when necessary.


Globalists understand that the cooperation of many individuals, institutions and corporations is needed to ensure that the potential fruits of globalization are spread throughout the world fairly and equitably. Globalists are committed to muting or eliminating globalization’s negative effects.


Basically, the globalists are about free trade, open borders, world citizenship and reducing first world prosperity to 2nd world status thus apparently having the effect of raising third world out of poverty into 2nd world status. Brazil would be an example of 2nd world prosperity level.

They have been succeeding quite well.


It used to be the case that someone could be a high-paid engineer or software engineer for life in the West. But thanks to Globalism most corporations are hell bent determined to offshore that work and get every white person they can get their hands on, and get them to train up their replacements before firing them. Try and learn new technical skills and the universities will bring out new courses in those areas just as quickly.



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 12:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Isurrender73




Cultural Marxism in Marx's writings but you will find it in those who claim to be following Marx.


I call Bollocks. Name one? Sounds like Identity Politicks Bollocks, to be more precise.
Bakunin, is that you?


The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation - which speculates upon the labor of people - will always find the means for its existence.

www.brainyquote.com...




Socialism is rule by the working people. They will decide how socialism is to work. To use the word “socialism” for anything but working people’s power is to misuse the term. Nationalisation of mines, railways, steel, etc. in a capitalist class society is not socialism, nor does this constitutes “the socialist sector of a mixed economy”. Such nationalisation in a capitalist society is simply a degree of state capitalism, with no relation to socialism. www.marxists.org...




Although Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote very little on socialism and neglected to provide any details on how it might be organized,numerous social scientists and neoclassical economists have used Marx's theory as a basis for developing their own models of socialist economic systems. The Marxist view of socialism served as a point of reference during the socialist calculation debate.




“In spite of this advance,” Marx continues, “this equal right … tacitly recognizes unequal individual endowment, and thus productive capacity, as a natural privilege. It is, therefore, a right of inequality, in its content, like every right. … To avoid all these defects, rights, instead of being equal, would have to be unequal.”

Because there is not yet complete abundance, the first stage of socialism will have to initially progress along those lines. However, once society reaches full abundance, Marx and Engels said, we won’t have to measure people against each other based on the amount of work they do.www.workers.org...



Would you like to explain how a man who wrote very little about how to implement his system could be responsible for how the system has been forced upon some nations?

He can be quoted as saying Socialism is rule by the people and not centralized government ownership. He agreed that man in his current state was unequal and should be treated as such. He believed we would evolve to a more equal state not that we have achieved it or should force it.

How could Marx be responsible for what has been done under the guise of Socialism or Comunism?


edit on 31-7-2018 by Isurrender73 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 12:34 AM
link   
a reply to: face23785


Except that's left-wing propaganda. Conservatives problem with illegal immigration has nothing to do with skin color. That's something progressives had to invent to pretend it's racist to not be okay with rampant illegal immigration. It's easier to just cry "racist" than to actually debate the issue.

Good job.


Blah blah blah. Allow me to introduce you to the 4th post in this thread:




posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 12:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: visitedbythem
a reply to: olaru12

I agree. All progressives should be thrown out of the country, withe a swift kick in the ass



How do you identify a progressive. We need to know before we round them all up and throw them out.
When we catch them we can sew a yellow "P" on their coat sleeve.



That's an easy one! Just organize a protest against our own country and give out free pink hats.


It would be easier to get the voter role and kick everyone out that didn't vote Trump. You can't trust the anti-Trumpets, they're liars.



I'm with you!!!

Should we start with the black or brown people.


Libtards are not defined by skin colour.

Next.


It's scary how they literally can't talk about anything without thinking about skin color.





Actually it's a fair comment, it's the conservatives always going on about immigration, which translates to "stop letting brown people in" ... It's as plain as day for anyone paying attention...


Except that's left-wing propaganda. Conservatives problem with illegal immigration has nothing to do with skin color. That's something progressives had to invent to pretend it's racist to not be okay with rampant illegal immigration. It's easier to just cry "racist" than to actually debate the issue.

Good job.





Can you show me where all these white illegal immigrants are coming in an stealing American jobs ?... I didn't think so...


Is that what you think of illegal immigrants? They’re “brown”?



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 02:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Words

Play dense all you like, I'm not buying it...



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 05:24 AM
link   
a reply to: dug88

I guess there can be at least a couple ways to define 'globalist': 1) could be a general term to refer to anyone who is pro-world government. 2) may refer to specifically the current network of people/families/organizations that have been working for possibly centuries, and at the least decades to establish one.

Those specific people may include some Zionists and 'Neo Conservatives', Banking families, politicians, etc that just happen to be Jews, but not exclusively.



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 05:28 AM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I like this one better






posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 05:58 AM
link   
a reply to: dug88

The liberal left have really gone crazy.....

Human beings should not be acting like this in the far future of 2018



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 07:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: face23785


Except that's left-wing propaganda. Conservatives problem with illegal immigration has nothing to do with skin color. That's something progressives had to invent to pretend it's racist to not be okay with rampant illegal immigration. It's easier to just cry "racist" than to actually debate the issue.

Good job.


Blah blah blah. Allow me to introduce you to the 4th post in this thread:




Deflections!

Wait. 4th post you say? Might be a window to the 4th Reich as well.




posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Isurrender73

That's quite the wall of text out of context, gimme a break.
I've asked a rather simple question, humor me with an answer?



Name one?


Where is your cultural marxist followers of Marx now. Must be quite the crowd, right?



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 07:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Scrutinizing
I suppose that makes them dickheads?


yes, yes it does.



posted on Jul, 31 2018 @ 07:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Thejoncrichton
There is definitely an assault on language by the left going on. They keep redefining words to suit their agenda.


What the hell did anything he had to say have to do with the left???

The IQ's get lower on here by the day!




top topics



 
30
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join