You are so right about everything you said. Without low IQ voters, there would not be a Democrat party in the US. I’m on the edge of my seat to see
what clowns they run. Im thinking it is going to be some moron cocktail with the likes of Eric Holder, Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren. Hopefully they
run on the new fancy Democratic Socialism platform that’s so popular now but that’s a different thread for a different day.
The biggest problem I see for the midterms and 2020 election is how to keep Democrats from cheating their way to victory. They won’t cheat like the
make believe cheating that elected Trump, ya know... those Trump backing Russians blah blah blah BS. They will try to win with illegals, dead people
and as many fake ballots they can possibly fill out. Did anybody notice how long it took the results from Florida to come in back when Trump won in
2016? I can’t help but think the Democrats greatly underestimated how many people would actually vote for Trump so they had to scramble last minute
and start filling out ballots to try to push the real criminal (google bleach bit, Clinton smashing evidence, Clinton Foundation money laundering,
Dead people in Clinton’s wake, Uranium deal with Russia etc.) over the top.
Trump actually needs to prove that journalists are secretly doing what they're OPENLY doing on the air? I know the public is a bit slow these days but
No. I'm pretty sure everyone knows that the MSM is conspiring against Trump. And actually, they're doing a pretty piss poor job of it, aren't they?
Think about this. The ENTIRE liberal arm of the MSM has completely and utterly failed to depose the guy they claim is the dumbest man alive for TWO
WHOLE YEARS. And this is with the help of the FBI! The FBI! These people cannot find a speck of actionable dirt on Donald Trump?
Unbelievable. It's either unbelievable or it's (Ahem) not believable. Take your pick.
Know when you can tell a person on ATS is full of BS? When they cannot build a logical argument, have nothing but innuendo, will not answer questions
directed at them, demand answers from everyone else, and then uses terms like sheep when they get answers / evidence that doesn’t fit their spin.
edit on 1-8-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed
you really have no ground to stand on in this debate
if congress is happy with potus they will not ever remove him
if someone can sway his popularity then a vote could remove him
You have failed to dispute it was an illegal campaign contribution and instead argued about impeachment, which wasn't your original failed claim.
You have failed to accept the facts.
john edwards case proves nothing and is not remotely the same as the potus issues.
you have failed in the first place to show that a campaign can not pay hush money in relation to personal well being.
One yuuuuge failure you have is that there was no campaign paid hush money.
You do not even know what you are arguing about.
I have tried to be civil here but it is tough when you do not present facts and then turn around and claim some falsity that i have some duty to set
This whole mess is much conflation and overreach. Hush money was paid but not from the campaign. They are trying to say that if trumps hush money
aided the campaign then it might be illegal. That is the over reach because even if it did benefit the campaign there would have to be some record of
intent to help the campaign and no intent to help trumps personal well being.
All trump has to say is that he did not want to lose his wife over the affair.....case closed...just msm INSINUATIVE fodder.
edit on 1-8-2018 by howtonhawky because: (no reason given)
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.