It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
there was clearly no threat of violence to her.
The result is that she would have felt slighted, but would
have been wrong to expect any more to occur.
ooh, your perception is so wrong !
Physically violating some one IS violence.
Whether to a child, woman, elderly, or to another guy.
"Slighted" for protecting her uterus ? are you for real ?
She had every legal RIGHT to incapacitate him till
the police put cuffs on him.
As for "if" rolls were reversed . . . it would take a lot
LESS force to arrest the lady. Why is there even a debate ?
. . . No this behavior is not o.k., it's a crime.
Quote from the law society :
The status of the victim is taken into account. A threat
made to a child might be sufficient to constitute an assault,
while an identical threat made to an 300lb. adult might not.
. . . the guy was a lot bigger than her, shame on him.