It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Five Clues Don Jr.’s Trump Tower Meeting Was Set Up as Dem Dirty Trick

page: 2
33
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 11:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Kharron


Cohen said yesterday that Trump knew ahead of time and is willing to testify on that.


No, he didn't. Turned out to be fake news, since his attorney clearly states he did not make any such comment.

Also said it isn't on tape, so just another "he said, she said" accusation.

No evidence = didn't happen. Talking heads aren't good enough, physical evidence needed.

And besides, even if it turns out to be true, it's still a nothing-burger. The meeting to "get dirt" wasn't illegal. Any more illegal than Hillary meeting with UK nationals/Russian nationals (by proxy) to "get dirt" on Trump. Not a crime. Never will be. Keep grasping, in typical impotent lefty fashion.

And finally, Trump/Trump Jr./etc have *never* made any false statements under oath OR to executive agency investigators. Therefore, absolutely no possible way this turns into a crime. And since the GOP majority Congress wouldn't act anyways (regardless of what happens), what are you hoping to accomplish?

Plenty of other countries out there for those who don't want to live in a Constitutional Republic.

That's 5 or 6 layers of "it didn't happen" - good luck. Plenty of plausible deniability.


edit on 7/28/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Kharron


Cohen said yesterday that Trump knew ahead of time and is willing to testify on that.


No, he didn't. Turned out to be fake news, since his attorney clearly states he did not make any such comment.

Also said it isn't on tape, so just another "he said, she said" accusation.

No evidence = didn't happen. Talking heads aren't good enough, physical evidence needed.

And besides, even if it turns out to be true, it's still a nothing-burger. The meeting to "get dirt" wasn't illegal. Any more illegal than Hillary meeting with UK nationals/Russian nationals (by proxy) to "get dirt" on Trump. Not a crime. Never will be. Keep grasping, in typical impotent lefty fashion.

And finally, Trump/Trump Jr./etc have *never* made any false statements under oath OR to executive agency investigators. Therefore, absolutely no possible way this turns into a crime. And since the GOP majority Congress wouldn't act anyways (regardless of what happens), what are you hoping to accomplish?

Plenty of other countries out there for those who don't want to live in a Constitutional Republic.

That's 5 or 6 layers of "it didn't happen" - good luck. Plenty of plausible deniability.




Who said Cohen's claim about Trump House was on any tape?
In any case,the Cohen lawyer at the forefront..Lanny Davis has already stated (25th) that Trump lied about the Trump House meeting, a couple of days ago.

This thread is just a link to a sucking-up overture by Bannon, who has absolutely no fake news credibility, never mind telling the truth, and who is mostly likely to walk into oblivion...along with creepy Milo, eventually.
edit on 28-7-2018 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Where did you get those news?

I have just searched for that and cannot find it anywhere. Please post where they denied it. And it's not on tape anyway.

As far as we know, including from that Reuters article, neither Cohen nor Davis made any comments on it. What does this mean?

If you really think about Cohen and his situation, he will try anything to save himself and to help Mueller out, if he can. Only Mueller does not need him. What can Cohen give Mueller that they don't already have? They raided all his files, have his computers, have the tapes, have millions of documents and emails. What could Cohen possibly know that Mueller does not already have tangible proof of?

Knowledge that Trump was in on it apparently. If I were Cohen I would leak this information so that everyone knows I have it, but would not discuss it unless with Mueller, as this is the only thing that can save Cohen and get him immunity, otherwise he will go down with Trump as an accomplice to the financial crimes.

It is logical that he or his lawyer leaked the info and are now waiting to see if anyone of importance bites and asks for it.




edit on 28-7-2018 by Kharron because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

First you denied that the meeting even took place.
Than you claimed how Trump Jr. didn't know what the meeting was about.
After it was proven that Trump Jr. Was aware of the agenda you claimed that Donald didn't know about it.
Now it was all set up by the democrats.
You ridicule yourself without even knowing it.
Sad.



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
a reply to: xuenchen

First you denied that the meeting even took place.
Than you claimed how Trump Jr. didn't know what the meeting was about.
After it was proven that Trump Jr. Was aware of the agenda you claimed that Donald didn't know about it.
Now it was all set up by the democrats.
You ridicule yourself without even knowing it.
Sad.


Um, we all knew the meeting took place, Don Jr. released the entire e-mail chain to open up everything they knew on their side. A Russian woman met with them, claiming to have dirt on Kancles, but only wanted to speak about the Malinsky act. If you can show the crime there, go nuts, I'd like to know if there is one.



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
a reply to: xuenchen

First you denied that the meeting even took place.
Than you claimed how Trump Jr. didn't know what the meeting was about.
After it was proven that Trump Jr. Was aware of the agenda you claimed that Donald didn't know about it.
Now it was all set up by the democrats.
You ridicule yourself without even knowing it.
Sad.


Um, we all knew the meeting took place, Don Jr. released the entire e-mail chain to open up everything they knew on their side. A Russian woman met with them, claiming to have dirt on Kancles, but only wanted to speak about the Malinsky act. If you can show the crime there, go nuts, I'd like to know if there is one.


Magnitsky Act... like Magnet Sky, but magnet with an i... MagnitSky.

Yes, they said they talked about adoptions, which is probably true, I don't see why it wouldn't be. In retaliation for the Magnitsky Act, imposed by our country and spreading to many others now, Putin put a hold on adoptions of Russian kids for the American parents. So when they were discussing the Magnitsky Act and the repeal of it, re-opening adoptions would have been a carrot for the Trumps.

Think about that then... why would the Trump family meet with the Russians to discuss the sabotage of a legislature imposed by our own country? For free? For nothing in return? Why would a family vying for the White House even consider modifying legislature or sabotaging the work of their own country to help another country? This could be seen as treasonous on its own, why risk that for nothing in return?

Keep open to the possibility that all this is real, because more and more it looks that way.



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 06:00 PM
link   
I'm now more convinced than ever that Xuenchen is paid to be here. Daily thread after thread after thread pushing absurd propaganda and fake news.



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Admitted
No because apparently they dumb enough to use word password as their password on their computer system.



posted on Jul, 29 2018 @ 07:12 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I've got some breaking news- it's been reported that a report that may or not have been reported by a source that may or may not exist has possibly surfaced.Purple monkey dish washer.

I swear the armchair journo's are ruining the profession with hearsay, speculation and Chinese whispers. Here's a tip, if the headline is in caps lock or gives 'five reasons why X is Y' then take it with a grain of salt and them some.



posted on Jul, 29 2018 @ 08:16 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This explains why new Democrats in Congress are now coming forward to push the same bs. Today they decided to move from collusion to "conspiracy".

I guess the Democrats they were using reached the "not believable" stage with as much as they keep lying about this.


Democrats are desperate... I still think they are going to get destroyed in the midterms.
edit on 29-7-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2018 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


Democrats are desperate... I still think they are going to get destroyed in the midterms.


Same here


I think their "blue wave" crap is another make-believe democrat talking point. I am a member on several democrat forums, and they pass out their talking points daily. Much like they tried to do in 2016 (by inflating polls to energize their voters/disenfranchise conservative voters), they are attempting to create a false narrative

As long as we show up like we did in 2016 the democrat party is T O A S T



posted on Jul, 29 2018 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: ErrorErrorError



Foxys game. Keep em guessing. How can you ever be wrong if anything is posxible!



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 08:31 AM
link   
They Giuliani was just on tv saying trump DID know about the meeting.
He just didn't attend.

Oh my...



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 08:31 AM
link   
Giuliani's crazy spin is so retarded.



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a reply to: fencesitter85

Nah. It's just how he gets his jollies.



posted on Jul, 30 2018 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: fencesitter85

Naturally, accuse someone who continually Trump's democrat talking points of being a "bot" or "shill." I've got plenty of the same accusations, because I dare to call out Democrat lies & always correct the record.

As our WW2 heroes would say, "you know you're on target when you start taking flak." Keep it up xuen


Regardless, there is nothing absurd or propagandizing about this OP. It is clear Trump was indeed set up from the get-go by a minority of bitter losers looking to retaliate. It is clear who the guilty parties are, since socialists (read: "progressives") always exact their revenge/enact their unpopular policies through the force of the State/legal system.

Look no further than Maduro in Venezuela.

Worst part about all this is that the meeting you are all suddenly obsessed over is yet another nothing-burger. No crimes were committed. "Oppo research" is a standard part of campaigns, as Hillary's campaign actions taught us..... (since she cooperated with the Russians/British to compile her unproven dossier)
edit on 7/30/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
33
<< 1   >>

log in

join