Media Ignored Obama Supporting Terrorists and His Staffer Taking Photos Under Skirts.

July 27, 2018

These are two perfect examples of how 90% of the U.S. media IGNORES many crimes committed by Democrat Administrations. They knew about these incidents associated with President Barack Hussein Obama, but deliberately chose not to report them.

In 2014, President Obama gave $200,000 of our taxpayer dollars to a TERRORIST GROUP that tortures and kills innocent men, women and children.

The Obama administration approved a grant of $200,000 of taxpayer money to an al-Qaeda affiliate in Sudan, the Middle East Forum (MEF) discovered.

The grant was approved ten years after the US Treasury designated the Islamic Relief Agency (ISRA) as an organization which funds terrorists.

Government officials also authorized the release of at least $115,000 of the grant after they realized that the Khartoum-based ISRA was on the Treasury's list of terror organizations.

Source: www.israelnationalnews.com...

In JULY 2016, President Obama's Director of American Indian/Alaska Native Education Initiatives, was seen stalking, and taking "upskirt" photos.

Surveillance footage exclusively obtained by DailyMail.com shows one of President Obama’s senior officials following a woman around a DC Metro station and taking a picture up her skirt with his cell phone.

William Mendoza was caught on security cameras carrying out the vile act while he was executive director of the White House Initiative on American Indian and Alaska Native Education.

Mendoza was arrested and charged in November 2016 after the woman, as well as three others, complained about his behavior to cops.

He pleaded guilty to a charge of attempted voyeurism in January 2017, was given suspended 90-day prison sentence, one year’s probation and was fined $100. He has not worked in public office since stepping down.

His arrest and conviction were never made public until DailyMail.com acquired the report of the investigation and the footage through a Freedom of Information Act request.

More at: www.dailymail.co.uk...

When you come to realize the sheer number, and scope of crimes the Obama Administration and the U.S. Media hid from public, it gives you pause, doesn't it?

Especially in light of how rabid and the obsessed the U.S. Media is over every little rumor of wrongdoing by President Trump, or people serving in his Administration. They ignore the many, MANY accomplishments of President Trump, to report all day long on negative rumors.

Fortunately, President Trump is so focused on delivering GREAT THINGS for America (and the World), the Democrat-friendly U.S. Media is becoming more irrelavant by the day.

-CareWeMust

yeah but Obama NEVER had two scoops of ice cream.....

don't forget all the cash-money(Hos-TBD)* he paid Iran.

*Lyric is borrowed from the obamas' BFF Jay Z. Who's concert, per Michelle O, is very kid friendly

a reply to: carewemust

Thanks Obama.

I don't think we need any more evidence of bias in the media. All we need now is a reason why. A legitimate and concrete reason to explain all this.

What is the point of this thread again and why is the second one even on here?

His conduct was being investigated by the IG and he resigned before it finished and was arrested a few day later. How the hell do you ignore something while at the same time have an IG investigation going?

I get that you have to post propaganda every chance you get but do better man.

P.S. I know this is a media bashing thread which makes it even more a sorry affair.

a reply to: SocratesJohnson


I remember clearly how the liberal media ignored those pallets of cash being loaded on the a plane and flown from the U.S. to Iran. Those A-holes mentioned Iran releasing U.S. hostages, and gave Obama credit...and that's where it ended.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: carewemust

Thanks Obama.

You forgot to add the sarcasm emoticon.

Can any of the first story be verified by legit news outlets? Tired of these fake news outlets and them being used as sources. Can't seem to find anything about it anywhere else but the usual fake news sites and Fox.

originally posted by: Jonjonj
I don't think we need any more evidence of bias in the media. All we need now is a reason why. A legitimate and concrete reason to explain all this.

It's just simple hatred of the party that freed the slaves. Been going on for a long time.

Ronald Reagan was skewered by ABC, NBC, CBS, NYT, WaPo. And most people believed everything these so-called journalist of integrity said.

There was no Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Twitter, Breitbart, or other platform to dispute them.

Now, Democrats use Ronald Reagan in their campaign speeches, just as frequently as they use John F. Kennedy.

The point of this thread is equal opportunity bashing.

For two years the current presidents haters built a time machine to 'discredit' him.

Complete with ex playboy models, and fake accusers, and everything else they could pull from there................hat.

a reply to: Pyle

I respect that you always chime in to my threads to speak your mind. Your consistency is admirable.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SocratesJohnson


I remember clearly how the liberal media ignored those pallets of cash being loaded on the a plane and flown from the U.S. to Iran. Those A-holes mentioned Iran releasing U.S. hostages, and gave Obama credit...and that's where it ended.

Except it was reported on.

CNN

Google Search showing many outlets reported this

Why do you make things up that can be easily found with a god damn google search?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Pyle

I respect that you always chime in to my threads to speak your mind. Your consistency is admirable.

Its easy to be consistent when you are going up against propaganda that can be dismantled easily.

originally posted by: damonster
Can any of the first story be verified by legit news outlets? Tired of these fake news outlets and them being used as sources. Can't seem to find anything about it anywhere else but the usual fake news sites and Fox.

Unless the U.S. Treasury, or the Terrorist group, opens their books to show the transfer of funds, all news is suspect, regardless of the source. That goes for almost every story we see. Fake News is rampant.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SocratesJohnson


I remember clearly how the liberal media ignored those pallets of cash being loaded on the a plane and flown from the U.S. to Iran. Those A-holes mentioned Iran releasing U.S. hostages, and gave Obama credit...and that's where it ended.

Why do you guys lie so much? There were plenty of outlets reporting it. Also it is nothing like you guys continue to portray it as, you guys make it sound like Obama admin just handed over Billions in tax dollars which isn't even close to being true. It was Iran's money.


Iran to receive $1.7 bln in U.S. claim settlement at the Hague

The United States and Iran on Sunday settled a longstanding claim at the Hague, releasing to Tehran $400 million in funds frozen since 1981 plus $1.3 billion in interest, the State Department said.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: damonster
Can any of the first story be verified by legit news outlets? Tired of these fake news outlets and them being used as sources. Can't seem to find anything about it anywhere else but the usual fake news sites and Fox.

Unless the U.S. Treasury, or the Terrorist group, opens their books to show the transfer of funds, all news is suspect, regardless of the source. That goes for almost every story we see. Fake News is rampant.

Then wouldn't it be better to wait till all the facts are out before posting a story that may be fake?

a reply to: neo96

Also, as more and more Obama Admin corruption and illegal acts emerge to public knowledge, the "protection" and "coverup" mechanisms are breaking down. The number of disclosures grow, like snowball going downhill.

a reply to: carewemust

You'll get no argument from me.

The media has always been in the pocket of Obama's party.

a reply to: Pyle

Regarding the "Billions$$$ for Hostages" I'm referring to audio and visual media. (RADIO and TV)