It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Conservatives back down from effort to force a vote on impeaching Rod Rosenstein

page: 5
18
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2018 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Muninn

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: olaru12

Speaking of transparency, I can't wait for his tax returns to be subpoenaed. You just know it has to happen eventually.


Why?

If there was anything bad about it it would have been leaked by now.


Not necessarily.

That's illogical.




posted on Jul, 27 2018 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Muninn

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: olaru12

Speaking of transparency, I can't wait for his tax returns to be subpoenaed. You just know it has to happen eventually.


Why?

If there was anything bad about it it would have been leaked by now.

Sorry bro. You may accept fishy logic like that as sound but the law doesn't. If the tax records need to be investigated then they'll be subpoenaed. You leave no stone unturned in an investigation.



posted on Jul, 27 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall

originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Lol how long will it take for Dems to find a breadcrumb of evidence? Didn’t this investigation start over 2yrs ago?



If you want evidence look no further than trumps TWITTER FEED! Also 10 indictments covering 35 people and 3 business. 5 guilty pleas, 2 upcoming criminal trials, and 1 in jail.....


All from this investigation....So I guess that we should not have called Russia out on any of this? We should not have investigated it, right?




And where in all of that is the collusion charge? Hmmmm.



posted on Jul, 27 2018 @ 06:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Muninn

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: olaru12

Speaking of transparency, I can't wait for his tax returns to be subpoenaed. You just know it has to happen eventually.


Why?

If there was anything bad about it it would have been leaked by now.


Not necessarily.

That's illogical.


Is it? Why hold on to it if its so damning?

We have escalating rhetoric from democrats, from taking to the streets and confronting people to Treason.

The only reason I see for holding onto that is political.

What is the logical reason for holding onto this, and indicting Russians that will never have to appear before a judge?



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Mueller's team doesnt leak.

Every leak we have seen about the investigation has come from other sources. Such as reporters camped out at a court house leading to us learning about indictments though no one knew who they were for until the court unsealed Manafort and Gates names and then we got bamboozled later when they release Papadopoulos's name later in the day, how we are always learning from sources that were interviewed or contacted by Mueller, or leaks from the white house.

The most we have heard from Mueller's team is what they say in court and their PR guy saying "No Comment".



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 01:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Mueller's team doesnt leak.

Every leak we have seen about the investigation has come from other sources. Such as reporters camped out at a court house leading to us learning about indictments though no one knew who they were for until the court unsealed Manafort and Gates names and then we got bamboozled later when they release Papadopoulos's name later in the day, how we are always learning from sources that were interviewed or contacted by Mueller, or leaks from the white house.

The most we have heard from Mueller's team is what they say in court and their PR guy saying "No Comment".


Mueller's team can't afford to appear to leak.

And they don't have to leak if Carter Page is also known as UCE-1.



posted on Jul, 28 2018 @ 02:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Mueller's team doesnt leak.

Every leak we have seen about the investigation has come from other sources. Such as reporters camped out at a court house leading to us learning about indictments though no one knew who they were for until the court unsealed Manafort and Gates names and then we got bamboozled later when they release Papadopoulos's name later in the day, how we are always learning from sources that were interviewed or contacted by Mueller, or leaks from the white house.

The most we have heard from Mueller's team is what they say in court and their PR guy saying "No Comment".


Mueller's team can't afford to appear to leak.

And they don't have to leak if Carter Page is also known as UCE-1.



He admitted to being Male-1 not UCE-1. Either way how would that matter to leaks?



posted on Jul, 29 2018 @ 02:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Mueller's team doesnt leak.

Every leak we have seen about the investigation has come from other sources. Such as reporters camped out at a court house leading to us learning about indictments though no one knew who they were for until the court unsealed Manafort and Gates names and then we got bamboozled later when they release Papadopoulos's name later in the day, how we are always learning from sources that were interviewed or contacted by Mueller, or leaks from the white house.

The most we have heard from Mueller's team is what they say in court and their PR guy saying "No Comment".


Mueller's team can't afford to appear to leak.

And they don't have to leak if Carter Page is also known as UCE-1.



He admitted to being Male-1 not UCE-1. Either way how would that matter to leaks?


I didn't specify what he admitted to, did I.

It matters because there are already questions about bias.




top topics



 
18
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join