It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

**BREAKING** GOP lawmakers introduce articles of impeachment against Rosenstein

page: 8
56
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   
Rosenstein is lucky this isn't the olden days. They didn't bother impeaching. They would just get after you with the tar and feathers




posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 12:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

please, lets just go intsead with witholding and redacting.

Im no fanboy, and certainly not a koolaid drinking partisan. ANYONE with a couple braincells sees what this arrogant DB is doing. I am consistantly surprised how many obviously intelligent people are willing to lay down on the train tracks over an emotional appeal involving an ideological difference of political opinion.
edit on 26-7-2018 by BlueJacket because: sp



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

Carter Page FISA Warrent Application and Renewals.

RR doesnt sign one until June 2017, after he became DAG. Before that day Dana Boente and Sally Yates signed it before that date. The only two sections in each FISA warrants and renewal with redacted signatures for FBI special agents and DOJ attorneys things RR was not. So how can RR be responsible for the Dossier being used before he was in a position to even know about it?
edit on 26-7-2018 by Pyle because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 12:46 AM
link   
Sorry to break it,
All Trump Sycophants

The motion, as introduced, is unlikely to see any kind of a vote. House Speaker Paul Ryan, along with many other Republicans, don't want it. They know a real push for impeachment would tear their party asunder.

Even if it does get a vote, and even if Mr Rosenstein is impeached, two-thirds of the Senate would have to support removing him after a trial in the chamber. The chances of that - which would require a significant number of Democrats in favour - are less than zero.


Link



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 06:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Cassi3l
Sorry to break it,
All Trump Sycophants

The motion, as introduced, is unlikely to see any kind of a vote. House Speaker Paul Ryan, along with many other Republicans, don't want it. They know a real push for impeachment would tear their party asunder.

Even if it does get a vote, and even if Mr Rosenstein is impeached, two-thirds of the Senate would have to support removing him after a trial in the chamber. The chances of that - which would require a significant number of Democrats in favour - are less than zero.


Link

Yeah , who would know better than the BBC , right ?



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 06:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Annee
Sounds like a desperation move to me.

Could trigger something else.


It could, such as exposure of just how deep the corruption at the FBI has run.


Power Corrupts - - however, it doesn't corrupt everyone.

Power also Corrupts those with an agenda to try to take down those they don't want to have power.


Except that was "absolute power corrupts absolutely".

What is not said is as important as the truth., now more so by being excluded. This appears to be why so often certain people are lost and on the left listening to some major Haters of reality in the MSM. Only on a few Progressive MSM sites do I see leftist comments getting stars and likes over the middle to right observations of reality. A small percent I do understand, are not being nice to the progs as some are like the trolls for Marxism we seem to have on ATS and won't give any quarter to any facts that contradict their narrative.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 06:51 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah. It's not going anywhere.

Who's willing to bet?
edit on 7262018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:05 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

No redactions are not going buh bye because the moron in chief said so. He knows that if he unredacted the warrant his whole frigging story is down the toilet. He knows because the intelligence people have shown him the proof.
This is noise that I'm willing to bet doesn't even get voted on.
Heard the latest. Russia is now working with the dems. Lol.
I mean how much bullship can be throw at you before you move out of range.
There is no support for this on the floor. It's already a dead issue.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

The Senate wants no part in this. Theres not enough support in the house and this is already dead.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:09 AM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Is it?

Lol.
Ya sure about that?



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:17 AM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Trump said HE IS NOT GOING TO APPROVE UN-REDACTING THE WARRANT!
It doesn't serve him. The evidence is strong that the warrant was valid.
What's the point of going after Rosenstein for it when trump already closed the door.
God why can't you guys see you're being led around by your nose and he knows he's got you fooled.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:21 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




There's zero comparison to "public" disclosure


This is the GOP house were talking about right?

And you say that?
Pfffft Hahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahaha.u
edit on 7262018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:23 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Wanna bet?



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:24 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

And yet everyone knows this isn't going anywhere.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Wanna GET ME A COKE?



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 09:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Annee
Sounds like a desperation move to me.

Could trigger something else.


It could, such as exposure of just how deep the corruption at the FBI has run.


Power Corrupts - - however, it doesn't corrupt everyone.

Power also Corrupts those with an agenda to try to take down those they don't want to have power.


Except that was "absolute power corrupts absolutely".

What is not said is as important as the truth., now more so by being excluded. This appears to be why so often certain people are lost and on the left listening to some major Haters of reality in the MSM. Only on a few Progressive MSM sites do I see leftist comments getting stars and likes over the middle to right observations of reality. A small percent I do understand, are not being nice to the progs as some are like the trolls for Marxism we seem to have on ATS and won't give any quarter to any facts that contradict their narrative.


I am very familiar with the full quote, where it came from, and who said it.

Your "point" is as much theater as this attempt at impeachment.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

And yet everyone knows this isn't going anywhere.

well we know what everyone said two years ago as well
you go right ahead and listen to what everyone says
rosenstein is expendable, and he can go without affecting the investigation as he is only the figurehead no different than comey
I am not in anyway saying what the gop group in congress is doing is right, but it appears to be smart politically.
Fight corruption, drain the swamp, but nothing will really change.

but hey you know all about this.....



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 09:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

There isn't a party that's ever been absolutely corrupted than the one that rigged their primary and steal a nomination from Colonel Sanders.



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 09:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Annee

There isn't a party that's ever been absolutely corrupted than the one that rigged their primary and steal a nomination from Colonel Sanders.


Again, you are so far to one side - - you have no real objective thought.

Sander is and was a sham.

What does that have to do with the subject of this thread?

edit on 26-7-2018 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2018 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Search ATS for the DNC convention thread.

That was the sham.

Has a lot to do with this thread.

Apparently Trump haters are 'incorruptable' according to those with NO REAL OBJECTIVE thought.



new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join