It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aliens technology would probably be a million years more advanced than ours. They would have insane technology. Why would they even care to deal with us anyway other than keeping us as pets or harvesting us for food or something.
I doubt extraterrestrials would be a good thing. Just imagine how bad the Republicans would be after million years of controlling all three branches of government.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: myselfaswell
Aliens technology would probably be a million years more advanced than ours. They would have insane technology. Why would they even care to deal with us anyway other than keeping us as pets or harvesting us for food or something.
I doubt extraterrestrials would be a good thing. Just imagine how bad the Republicans would be after million years of controlling all three branches of government.
originally posted by: andre18
So i want to put this to all of you whom believe aliens exist in some manner, entering and exiting our earth space, making contacts and perhaps even contracts with government bodies and, for what ever reason you wish to imagine, the government holds the lid on these activities and the larger reality of it from the public.
So my question is to those that believe in this typical structure cover up narrative, what is your belief of a narrative that is really going on that you would genuinely accept as probable disclosure, from what they've kept the lid on, to, ok now they're actually coming out it releasing the truth. What would be that truth that you would acknowledge?
For it seems, that there is plenty of disclosure out in the public environment as it is, but as a skeptic, you have refused to adopt and subscribe to them because they don't conform to your specific opinion of how you would expect an alien reality to exist that would more likely be disclosed.
I feel this would be highly important and even significant for everyone else reading the many expectations you skeptics all have within your minds, of how you would allow disclosure to be identifiably credible.
Perhaps, those in the upper echelons who may in fact be debating over how to better disclose this information, may be better assisted by the amalgamation of the mindset of these ideas.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: andre18
Would you disclose if you thought that that disclosure would be the ruin of civilization?