It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UNidentified Contacts - What is happening in Italy?

page: 2
20
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:36 AM
link   
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

For what I am understanding people did a lot of talk on FB about what they believe is the shadow of that thing, however the guys at TXP Group say that that halo behind the figure might not be a shadow. In fact if the figure was invisible it makes sense that the shadow is also invisible. We know of experiments on invisibility carried out by US military, Russians, and the Chinese, and if you are able to repel light fotons from hitting the matter, the same should go with your shadow.

So what's that halo? When I read that it could be the vibrational offset of that body, moving at a speed that our eyes can't catch...well it resonated somehow. But I am not the best objective guy in this case, because I am a believer of multidimensional entities. And I never watched Star Wars!





posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: TheGreazel

Hi, that's what one guy wrote in commenting the picture on FB. I also believe that is not a shadow.
But if it's not a shadow and the pic is a fake, why bothering to create such a ultra-defined being and then put that fuzzy shadow behind?

I am reading all I can find about this topic.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:42 AM
link   
a reply to: humanoidlord

Hi, couple of guys on FB said they ran some analysis on this pic and they said they couldn't find any sign of digital manipulation. They only supposed there was a cardboard there in the bookstore, but how do you explain the audience? Were they all in onto this hoax?

I will post the picture taken in 2016, so you guys can compare the two and tell me what you think.
Thanks for the feedback



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:44 AM
link   
a reply to: KansasGirl

A forensic analysis is being run, both TXP and Nexus are known to have professional researchers in their ranks, I've never heard of them forging a case to advertise their work. Especially TXP, those guys most of the times DON'T publish the stuff that they collectl.

Anyway I will keep you posted, if they release the forensics on this pic I will publish it here.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:45 AM
link   
a reply to: humanoidlord

Ok Humanoidlord, thanks! Will post the couple of articles talking about this occurrence then.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: CynConcepts

Hi! I am posting the whole article where you guys can see this picture compared to the one taken in 2016. That entity looked not so detailed, and the shape of the body quite different but...well if it's a hoax to advertise...what? Warner Bros or Universal is about to make a SciFi in Italy?

I am really trying to look at this from all perspectives, but I can't seem to find any reason why a small bookstore in a small town at the border with the Alpes should do this...besides, I am reading so many stuff going on about that area...
I am sorry not much of that material is available in English, so I can only post what I find in the language.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 01:51 AM
link   
a reply to: deckdel

Hi, I am posting the full article with the pictures of the hovering object, and the entity allegedly taken in 2016 as well.
I would like to have your opinion about these two additional data, and if you guys think it is all a hoax.

Thanks!



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 02:05 AM
link   
Ok Guys so here is the link to the story as reported by TXP:

www.thexplan.net...

And this is the Nexus's take:

www.nexusedizioni.it...

Check out the picture taken in 2016. That black thing wears a similar sling, and has the same color of the skin but looks like a different being.
Well I let you guy sort this out. I am going to their conference this coming Thursday and if they release they pics of the claw marks I hope I can catch them and post here.

Let me know if you find anything else about this! Even someone debunking it, I don't mind. But I don't want to let this slide as another "BS" from the movies or books, because I know in the Valmalenco area something really big is going on.

Thanks for all your opinions!



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 02:55 AM
link   
a reply to: WilliamWAS

So ya think maybe we have another
aliens = a book signing here OP?
Just asking no judgement.
But my gawd what bitch'n
place to live.

edit on Ram72418v59201800000012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 04:09 AM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

I don't want to think that because if the first pic of these Black Entities was taken in 2016, and this second one in 2018, what type of commercial planning would wait two years before releasing it? The first pic was NEVER released to the public until this second one was taken. And the guys at TXP group seemed reluctant to publish it, unless they had stronger evidence to compare.

I have heard something happened to them when they were in that god forsaken valley, like they found weird tracks or something. If they show those pics the night of the conference I'm trying to catch them and will publish here.






posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 08:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: WilliamWAS
a reply to: KansasGirl

A forensic analysis is being run, both TXP and Nexus are known to have professional researchers in their ranks, I've never heard of them forging a case to advertise their work. Especially TXP, those guys most of the times DON'T publish the stuff that they collectl.

Anyway I will keep you posted, if they release the forensics on this pic I will publish it here.




I googled yesterday and found the other picture with this same "entity." It looks like the same thing but from a different angle.

Good on them for getting an analysis done on the photos. I sure wish they would let a third party choose the company who looks into the photo though. If they use their own familiar firm to look into it- How do we know that company isn't in on it as well?

I'm sorry to be such a wet blanket. I do appreciate the thread and your bringing this to our attention! I just have some suspicions about the way they are revealing things- having to pay for access to their main material is a red flag and the stringing out of info is suspect. The Darth Vader picture, too- it just looks fake as fake can be. The people in the audience that you mentioned- if that were a cardboard cutout standing there, of course they would not be looking at it. It would just be part of the scenery to them and they would be focused on the presentation.

I've googled some images of Darth Vader figurines and BOY do they look similar to the thing in these two photos.
edit on 24-7-2018 by KansasGirl because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
i found a close up:
www.thexplan.net...
holy terrible photoshop batman!


Is that T'Challa, the Black Panther?!?



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: WilliamWAS

Thanks for the interesting topic and these extra links. The more I read about this 'phenomena', the more it sounds similar to the Skinwalker Ranch, I believe tall dark figures have been reported there, too.

One thing I've noticed and not seen mentioned is a strange translucent orb hovering (from our perspective) top left of the entity. It is noticeable in the 2016 conference (look at the before and after pics from the Nexus site). In the bookshop photo I think I can see, unless I'm imagining it, a similar orb in the same position overlaid on the hanging garland. It is very faint yet I'm seeing an orb-like distortion there.

Finally, the pictures of the silver orb hovering in the sky are fascinating, but I can't shake off the feeling that it's a water droplet on the camera lens.

I'm looking forward to more information as it becomes available.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: PorteurDeMort

yep it apparently does, lol



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: WilliamWAS

then they are bad analysts, because this is a bad cut and paste job



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: WilliamWAS

that one also looks quite fakey, not as much as this one but still
also nibiru = hoax



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: KansasGirl

Your doubts are legit, I couldn't agree more. This is the reason why I watched their pre-conference on YouTube to see what type of speech they were delivering. They started from where everybody who reads about the Valmalenco incidents would start: looking at the pics available online. Then they went there for two years in a row, spoke with the locals and formed their own opinion. Diego Antolini said that what's happening over there is beyond belief, and not only in term of visual incidents (photographs) but especially in terms of GROUND CONTACTS and unmarked air crafts that swoop through the town breaking the sound barrier (illegal at low altitudes) chasing glowing spheres or round objects.

Does it sound familiar to you guys? We've had this happening in the US and former URSS between the 50s and the 80s at least...and of course it is still going on.

I agree with what they said during the preConf, that most of these phenomena are very much human, using technology that is simply kept away from the public knowledge.

Now about this pictures, did you see the one taken in 2016? What I can't understand is why that picture was never released at the time? My only explanation, beside the obvious hoax thing (but I never want to go there unless I have no other plausible view) is that they weren't sure what it was, but when a similar entity came back again they decided to put it out there.

I join your hope in the forensic run, I will post one pic that was analyzed months ago and turned out real. It's a gray being from behind a rock. And it's in the same valley where countless of witnesses reported similar sightings to the local police...




posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Encia22

Don't mention about the orbs, please...Jesus Christ...how could you see that?
That's the most delicate part of the whole investigation. I would have never mentioned had you not brought it up.

So I am compelled to say that I have access to more information that I am authorized to publish...for now.

But yes yes YES! You hit the target, sir.





posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: humanoidlord

Okay, I respect your opinion, we are used to see these type of images only in movies, and that's why our perception immediately goes to the "hoax" and "digital manipulation" side as soon as we confront with neat, clear, detailed images.

I get that and that's what we have been led to believe all these years...that the more blurry, the more faint, the more foggy an image is, the more mysterious and, therefore, close to "real" it is.

From what I am learning since I've started to get into this Pandora's Box, is that a lot of the images published or undisclosed by governments have been made blurry, but their originals were not like that.

Anyway I need grounded, realistic opinions because I struggle with myself to not share more...for now.

Thanks



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 03:24 PM
link   
Doesn't look friendly so my advice is bail.




top topics



 
20
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join