It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Without evidence, Trump claims documents confirm misconduct

page: 3
16
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Which makes you wonder why he doesn't just release the unredacted version.
Perhaps because it takes the mysterious out of the equation and doesn't actually support what he's saying???
It sure seems that that is a possibility considering the document as it is now disputes what he's been claiming.

A highly redacted document can say anything you want it to say. Or at least make some people doubt what it says.
Obviously...




posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:34 AM
link   
a reply to: notsure1

Because the forty percent that is visible says so.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Didn't know Marco Rubio was a leftist anything. News for the world I guess.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Sure they are.
It's really amazing how you guys can keep spinning when you get shown how wrong you all are every week.
I can't explain the disconnect with reslity. Over a political figure no less. And one the doesn't give a flying fig about them.
He lies to you every day and you keep accepting it.

They did not spy on trump or trumps campaign and the Russia probe is not a witch hunt as he keeps claiming.
How many yellow feathers does he have to spit out before you believe he ate the canary?



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:44 AM
link   
He essentially just tweeted the same thing (no collusion, fake witch hunt) based on the statements of Tom Fitton on Fox News that he told people to watch on Twitter a few minutes before. First off, they keep falsely claiming that Tom Fitton is the reason that thing got released. Bradley Moss and Mark Zaid (both lawyers) have been working for months longer than Tom Fittton ever did on the FOIA process and getting it released. Second, i'm really not buying that he's tweeting off the knowledge of the unredacted version (or he is and he's trying to create a diversion). Thats the feeling im getting off of his tactics since it got released. I think he'd be real quick on getting that declassified too if he had it and it was that good for him.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari




They already said he was no longer the topic of the investigation


Yeah... Ummmm... When was this?



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:55 AM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou




Obama ordered the FBI/DOJ to spy on Trump and they inserted plants on his campaign (Page and Manafort) with ties to the Russians to justify the FISA warrants. 


Once upon a time
in a galaxy far far away...



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 05:57 AM
link   
a reply to: DJMSN

Yeah this all sounds good and strong...
But...



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:00 AM
link   
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

That should indicate to you that they don't treat evidence lightly. It should confirm their reliability not cause doubt.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:06 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This pretty much confirms he doesnt.
Seperation of powers and all that.
Hate to inform you, the others, and him, but he wasn't elected emperor or king. A president has reins that steer him. He's not allowed to just pass edicts and demand everything he wants even if the man baby is used to being kowtowed to. Thems the rules even he has to play by. As much as it irks him to do so.
edit on 7232018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:12 AM
link   
a reply to: DJMSN

Roger Stone hasn't been charged yet either. If you have any doubt he will be well..



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:13 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

He makes baseless claims seven times before breskfast.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Does that say that?
Putting your words in someone else's mouth doesn't make a very convincing argument.
Try harder. This is just lazy baiting.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
So people *think* the President of the United States doesn't see all redacted documents?

Great !!

Keep *thinking*

💥😎💥
how much "thinking" do you do, on average? Like when you post your "breaking news"? Any thinking being done there? What about the critical kind? Still not sure why a half-baked conspiracy peddler like you would feel confident pointing the finger at anyone.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: vinifalou




Obama ordered the FBI/DOJ to spy on Trump and they inserted plants on his campaign (Page and Manafort) with ties to the Russians to justify the FISA warrants. 


Once upon a time
in a galaxy far far away...


Can't believe some of those guys still believe this.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 06:49 AM
link   
a reply to: CigaretteByrnes

I can't help but think a lot of them are just hanging on to save face.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 07:33 AM
link   
A Review of the DOJ/FBI FISA Application Release…


Having read, re-read and re-re-read, the recent FISA application release, here’s my take at both the 30,000 ft and granular level.

First, the elevated review is actually more interesting than the granular, which is remarkably odd considering how far we have traveled with this story.

Why publicly release the FISA application? After all, even with the voluminous redactions, it is very unusual and it would have been exceptionally easy to deny any FOIA request under the auspices of national security. To highlight this question, consider how stunned Fran Townsend was at the release: “Having run The Justice Dept office responsible for #FISA The release of these documents is irresponsible & will irreversibly weaken counterintelligence & Counterterrorism investigations going forward.”


click link for article...

This lays out everything wrong with the FISA bs and why its illegal.



posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 07:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
A Review of the DOJ/FBI FISA Application Release…


Having read, re-read and re-re-read, the recent FISA application release, here’s my take at both the 30,000 ft and granular level.

First, the elevated review is actually more interesting than the granular, which is remarkably odd considering how far we have traveled with this story.

Why publicly release the FISA application? After all, even with the voluminous redactions, it is very unusual and it would have been exceptionally easy to deny any FOIA request under the auspices of national security. To highlight this question, consider how stunned Fran Townsend was at the release: “Having run The Justice Dept office responsible for #FISA The release of these documents is irresponsible & will irreversibly weaken counterintelligence & Counterterrorism investigations going forward.”


click link for article...

This lays out everything wrong with the FISA bs and why its illegal.


To bad legal experts are saying exactly the opposite.


(post by Arnie123 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jul, 23 2018 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: Xcathdra
A Review of the DOJ/FBI FISA Application Release…


Having read, re-read and re-re-read, the recent FISA application release, here’s my take at both the 30,000 ft and granular level.

First, the elevated review is actually more interesting than the granular, which is remarkably odd considering how far we have traveled with this story.

Why publicly release the FISA application? After all, even with the voluminous redactions, it is very unusual and it would have been exceptionally easy to deny any FOIA request under the auspices of national security. To highlight this question, consider how stunned Fran Townsend was at the release: “Having run The Justice Dept office responsible for #FISA The release of these documents is irresponsible & will irreversibly weaken counterintelligence & Counterterrorism investigations going forward.”


click link for article...

This lays out everything wrong with the FISA bs and why its illegal.


To bad legal experts are saying exactly the opposite.
Too bad they aren't.




top topics



 
16
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join