It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump poised to take control of the Federal Reserve

page: 3
47
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

I agree. There is absolutely NO WAY the Feral Reserve would abdicate their control over our money supply. Trump would either be assassinated or he'd have a War against him.
edit on 21-7-2018 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I think when they become Prez they get taken aside and given suggestions that certain areas are "no go zones". No real fundamental change will occur.

"Being played" is an apt description.




posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 06:00 PM
link   
You guys don't see any possible problem with a wolf trying to guard the henhouse? Perhaps i should find a similar Russian euphemism to hit closer to home.
edit on 21-7-2018 by conspiracy nut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

You running cover for the Fed conveniently leave out salient facts. The biggest as shown during the GFC;

The Federal Reserve Deserves Blame For The Financial Crisis
www.forbes.com...



he Fed’s distortions create the boom and bust cycle by distorting the information that the price signal conveys to consumers and producers. It may seem like businesses are overinvesting but they are simply responding to false economic signals sent by the Federal Reserve. An inevitable bust occurs due to all of the bad investments made....


Many Americans probably believe that continuous boom and bust cycles are natural occurrences. The truth is we would not experience such dramatic economic swings were it not for monetary policies that distort real prices and encourage improper investment decisions. Boom and bust cycles are inevitable when government interventions confuse market participants.





www.brookings.edu...


From the onset of the crisis in August of 2007, the financial markets were characterized by disruptions to bank and later nonbank funding as uncertainty about the solvency and viability of counterparties mounted. The lack of transparency in structured investments and in the balance sheets of some complex institutions and the sense that events were moving fast with unknown outcomes meant that market participants could not and did not discriminate well between good and bad counterparties.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

Yeah wanting gold/silver to bring back stability had nothing to do with his demise /sarc



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: subfab

originally posted by: madenusa

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: CharlesT

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: BeefNoMeat

I dunno... from what I just read in the OP Trump is pushing for hyperinflation?

Only conclusion I got out of it... which would be a silly gamble with diminishing returns....


I don't see any other way to manage the national debt and unfunded liabilities other than to inflate them away.


It's a possibility... the Roaring 20's all over again.

But there is a rather horrible downside to that... see the Great Depression.

I'm no fan AT ALL of the federal reserve, btw. Wilson sold us all out on that deal.

However, an exit strategy would be nice.

Besides the next Great Depression.
If you have an adequate food and water supply, you better have an adequate gun and ammo supply... this generation is not like the 20s


this generation is worse.
it's a generation of social media darlings and instagram "models". waiting in line for 8 hours to save $10 at a build a bear.
the only time this generation will get upset is when internet is priced too high and fuel is above $4.50 a gallon.
If this generation looses there cell phone service it will be an zombie apocalypse. "matrix" how do I think now independently..



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 10:15 PM
link   
theres some guy out in the bowels if the internets telling qeople to

Trust the Plan

silly nutter



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 10:25 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

oh oh, the last president to try and take over the federal reserve was John F Kennedy through executive order 11110.

It did not end well for JFK. The Federal Reserve is the heart/ blood of the deep state.

edit on st2018000000Saturdayst000000Sat, 21 Jul 2018 22:28:02 -0500fAmerica/ChicagoSat, 21 Jul 2018 22:28:02 -0500 by SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 10:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: randyvs

Yeah wanting gold/silver to bring back stability had nothing to do with his demise /sarc



It didn't you bought into internet lies. JFK was actually against the use of silver certificates and was trying to get them eliminated. He wanted the federal reserve to be the only source of dollar bills. Even he understood the problems of trying to tie your currency to precious metals. In fact, he said


except for its use in coins, silver has no use in monetary functions .


JFK wanted the fed to have the power to control currency but that doesn't make a good conspiracy theory does it?
edit on 7/21/18 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 11:00 PM
link   
a reply to: highvein

the meeting at jekyll island.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 12:11 AM
link   
Haha nice! Now this is draining the swamp, the critters that it reveals will finally be exposed.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 08:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: xuenchen


The Federal Reserve should have never existed in the first place. Something that has held the U.S. back since it began with the meeting on the island.


Most of Congress was on Christmas break when the Federal Reserve Act was voted into law on December 23rd, 1913. Pretty shady business. A coincidence, no doubt.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

So in you're world there's no possibility at a positive outcome? Either he stands up to the banking cabal and is killed, letting the banking cabal continue their game. OR he gives in to them and lives and the banking cabal continues their game. Well, that's a pretty bleak and narrow view of the options.

Also worth noting that anything short of his death means he gave in to them. Quite the standards you've set.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

Seems like the government likes to give us garbage for christmas... wasn't obamacare passed on christmas eve?



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
Yeah wanting gold/silver to bring back stability had nothing to do with his demise /sarc


Show me where he wanted to bring back gold/silver. It'll be a long wait since you'll have zero proof.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 10:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
oh oh, the last president to try and take over the federal reserve was John F Kennedy through executive order 11110.

It did not end well for JFK. The Federal Reserve is the heart/ blood of the deep state.


Did you even bother reading that before you posted it? He was abolishing silver certificates and was allowing the Federal Reserve to replace them with Treasury Notes. He wanted silver used for industrial/manufacturing purposes and even said as much.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 10:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
Most of Congress was on Christmas break when the Federal Reserve Act was voted into law on December 23rd, 1913. Pretty shady business. A coincidence, no doubt.


Where'd you see that?


  • Passed the House on September 18, 1913 (287–85, 5 Present)
  • Passed the Senate on December 18, 1913 (54–34)


It passed with bi-partisan support. Notice the dates as well. Stop buying into the conspiracy bull****.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr


Don't bother. Everyone likes to think Kennedy was some sort of savior/crusader when in reality he wasn't even continuing the status quo, he gave the Fed more control.





edit on 22-7-2018 by AugustusMasonicus because: Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Augustus is actually correct, but it's fun to think that Kennedy opposed the Feds', but he didn't.

More likely Kennedy pissed off organized crime, CIA, and others so they smoked him.

Kennedy actually expanded the powers of the feds.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   


The Federal Reserve Deserves Blame For The Financial Crisis


That is insane and 100% wrong. The great recession was caused by greedy, immoral, out of control business people selling investments based on nothing and gambling on it until the system collapsed.

It had nothing to do with the fed, and without the fed we wouldn't have recovered.

Business people lie every day, why would this be any different?




top topics



 
47
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join