It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Michael Cohen Secretly Taped Trump Discussing Payment to Playboy Model

page: 10
21
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 11:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Not killing unborn babies is more important.




posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 12:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: BlueAjah

That doesnt stop it from being a campaign contribution. Nor does it change the fact that it wasnt reported.


A fine at worst case scenario if even true. It was a legally binding confidentiality agreement between two private parties. The campaign funds angle is a fabricated narrative that the bald porn lawyer youve been watching everyday on CNN has been peddling. The conversation is seen as exculpatory evidence that bolsters the defense that would arguably be attorney client privilege. Then somehow impeachment is factored in somewhere?


Bald porn lawyer on CNN, what the hell are you talking about? Why are you quoting Giuliani? Anything of financial value can be a campaign contribution. In this case it would likely fall under an unreported in-kind contribution.

FEC WEBSITE

FEC website to help explain this.
edit on 21-7-2018 by Pyle because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Pyle

Campaign contributions are paid TO a candidate's campaign.

How is it a campaign contribution if was paid FROM Trump TO this woman?


FEC website has information about contributions.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 01:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

I'm pretty sure his retainer fee covered this and therefore it wasn't possibly a campaign contribution.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 01:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

Easiest way to make rubles I've yet found, I'll say that much. Easiest way ever... and easy marks, too.
Next 6 years will be like a vacation.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 01:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian

Yea.... but there's just something about a man in a powerful position, with a lot of money, threatening and silencing woman he had an affair years back while his wife was home with their infant son. Something just... doesn't sit right with me.


Yes there is ....Lot$$$$$$$$ of lolly!! an easy pension for her.

She put up with him ..... pay day pay cheque??



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 01:26 AM
link   
Most women would share their billionaire husband rather than lose him alltogether.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 01:28 AM
link   
Re:
www.washingtonexaminer.com...

Smart team Trump move.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 01:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Pyle

I'm pretty sure his retainer fee covered this and therefore it wasn't possibly a campaign contribution.


No that wouldnt work either. Otherwise people would "pay" attorneys large sums of money as a retainer to give directly to candidates and things that help candidates. Contributions doesnt mean just money. It is anything of value. The silence of a former mistress right before the election would be considered something of value. Thus it would need to be reported.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 02:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
Ah oh.


President Trump’s longtime lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, secretly recorded a conversation with Mr. Trump two months before the presidential election in which they discussed payments to a former Playboy model who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, according to lawyers and others familiar with the recording.

The F.B.I. seized the recording this year during a raid on Mr. Cohen’s office. The Justice Department is investigating Mr. Cohen’s involvement in paying women to tamp down embarrassing news stories about Mr. Trump ahead of the 2016 election. Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws, and any conversation with Mr. Trump about those payments would be of keen interest to them.

Source

Oh there's more:


Karen McDougal, says she began a nearly yearlong affair with Mr. Trump in 2006, shortly after Mr. Trump’s wife, Melania, gave birth to their son Barron. Ms. McDougal sold her story for $150,000 to The National Enquirer, which was supportive of Mr. Trump, during the final months of the presidential campaign, but the tabloid sat on the story, which kept it from becoming public. The practice, known as “catch and kill,” effectively silenced Ms. McDougal for the remainder of the campaign.


But fake news right? I mean Trump officials absolutely denied thes allegations:



Look what can I say? I mean Bill had that affair with that heavyset intern in the Whitehouse back in the 90's. It's not as if the Republicans went nuts over that back then right? It's not as if Republicans still bring up that affair to that day? So we should just let this go.... sweep it under the rug, wear our MAGA hats ya know? If Melania can tolerate it... why can't we??


And like we said from the beginning, SO WHAT??? We don't care what Trump did before he became President...And neither do the Democrats who are pushing this story...No one's stupid enough to not know a morality issue is the last thing on the Democrats' minds...

What they are hoping for is to cause strife between Trump and Melania...That's it...

Killing babies to the Democrats is not much different than taking out the trash...Don't preach to us about the morality of the President...



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 02:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Iscool


And like we said from the beginning, SO WHAT???


Yes yes.... thank you for replying to this thread.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: highvein

Hey bud, I'm waiting for that source of yours about Democrats and leftists causing that one person to commit suicide. Where is it?




posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 02:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: gortex

That's a huge assumption.

Not an assumption a question , they are different.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 03:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Southern Guardian


I wonder what is worse. Paying someone for their silence, or silencing them by suicide. The left love to protest the wrong things.


Killing them is worse, got any links to Killary that are true or just pathetic no life trolls online



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 03:55 AM
link   
When you live long enough to see the left do a complete 180, and start sticking their noses in everyone's bedrooms.

While ignoring apparent Pedo's in their midst.

Some might see that as projection.
edit on 21-7-2018 by Wardaddy454 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 04:25 AM
link   



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 04:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian




Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws,


This is the only important part.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 04:47 AM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock




Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws,


Nothing happens ether way till we have the answer to this.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 04:49 AM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963




Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws,





What's treasonous about banging some strange?

That's the question. I personally have no knowledge of these laws or how they work. Do you?
But if he broke this law shouldn't he be punished the same as you and me if we broke a law?



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 04:54 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You cared enough to find that pic upload it to ats and then make this post.




top topics



 
21
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join