Suck it up... buttercup!

What dribble! So delusional and rambling on I had to scan through without reading much of this tripe. Talking about posting facts and not the first documented fact posted in this dribble. People living in their own fantastic emotionally derived matrix without ever seeing the real world around them. You have spewed so much unsubstantiated historical group think rhetoric that has no basis in truth, fact or even reality that your op is nothing more than over the top ravings of an out of control delusional lunatic. Seek physiological help. You definitely need it, immediately.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Again I am not talking about Obamas polls I am talking about Trumps not a comparison between the two.

All I will say is that overall when you compare how Obama's poles and Trumps polls were running, they seem to indicate that Obama was only slightly ahead. Although he did spend some time up in the 60%' range, Trump is really struggled to even break 50% yet.

Although like I keep saying thats just one indicator of his popularity.

a reply to: Kharron

I am pretty sure this OP belongs in the "Rant" forum?

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Yeah bookies odds tend to be one of the best indicators of election outcomes, I think because they have money on the line.

Some were only giving 2:1 odds the other day after the Trump/Putin meeting for Trump impeachment, make of that what you will.

a reply to: CharlesT

Seek physiological help. You definitely need it, immediately.

Wow!

You must be one hell of a good registered psychiatrist, to be able to give such urgent medical advice after reading such a small sample of your patients written words online, having never met them....knowing nothing about them.

I am impressed and am sure everyone else is!

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Yeah bookies odds tend to be one of the best indicators of election outcomes, I think because they have money on the line.

Some were only giving 2:1 odds the other day after the Trump/Putin meeting for Trump impeachment, make of that what you will.

Okay Okay, I don't bet on politics, but I'm a sports better so it's how I know of these things.... *hears booing in background*

Alright guys, I know, I know, shame on me.

I'll tell you a trick on that one, it's a trap bet. Sometimes they'll favor something to make it look like it's going to happen, they'll sometimes favor a team a little that they know is going to lose because it will subconsciously make the better think that team is going to win.

But I digress, now time for me to explain how I know that in this case... You can't bet that he won't be impeached, which would pay back 180 if you bet 100..

7/31/18 12:00 AM Will Donald Trump be impeached by the House in his 1st term? Yes -200

Winner 11/1/18 12:00 AM 2018 US Senate Election - Majority Outcome Republican Majority -300 Democratic Majority +500 No Overall Majority +400

Winner 11/1/18 12:00 AM 2018 US House of Representatives Election - Majority Outcome Democratic Majority -125 Republican Majority +120 No Overall Majority +900

linky

Edit: Sorry for the American style odds, it's not my fault, I was born this way and use dumb systems.

Polls are relevant in a REPUBLIC how?

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Interesting.

My brother was telling me actually that one of his mates made a good bit of money out of Trump because when he announced his candidacy he popped on a bet he would win, just for a laugh.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

After years of reading identical posts such as this by him/her and others just like him/her it doesn't take a professional to diagnose this person. All Progressive Liberals are emotionally unstable nuts to varying degrees.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Interesting.

My brother was telling me actually that one of his mates made a good bit of money out of Trump because when he announced his candidacy he popped on a bet he would win, just for a laugh.

Yea, there was even a casino (I think PaddyPower) that paid out early on people who bet on Hillary, which reeked to me, not the first time that they paid out early on politics and lost. The other two they did that with was Brexit and The Greek Referendum.

The other way I know that the impeachment bet is a trap, he is still favored on most books to win 2020.

a reply to: CharlesT

All Progressive Liberals are emotionally unstable nuts to varying degrees.

So let me get this straight, what you are saying is that anyone who identifies as a progressive liberal and therefore disagrees with your politics must be unstable and nuts.

Well I guess I betting go sign myself into the nearest nuthouse eh?

Do you not step back and think about the astounding arrogance that comes with assuming that those who take a opposing view to you politically must be mentally ill in someway?

a reply to: Kharron

It's a Cult:

Here are 10 warning signs of a potentially unsafe group or leader.

• Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability.

• No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry.

• No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget or expenses, such as an independently audited financial statement.

• Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies and persecutions. •

There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil.

• Former members often relate the same stories of abuse and reflect a similar pattern of grievances.

• There are records, books, news articles, or broadcast reports that document the abuses of the group/leader.

• Followers feel they can never be "good enough".

• The group/leader is always right.

• The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing "truth" or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible.

www.theguardian.com...

a reply to: FyreByrd

The laughs just don't stop today.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Kharron

I am pretty sure this OP belongs in the "Rant" forum?

Got moved from Rants to here. This place gives a bit wider berth so people get in less trouble for commenting.

What I find interesting about the whole thing is people's preference on what makes 'truthful' news.

What makes one source more legit than another?

One site has a political leaning in one direction while another leans in the other, how does that make the truth?

Just because something comes in the flavor you like doesn't make it the truth, it makes it an opinion.

Therein lies the problem, the news doesn't have to be truthful, it has to be outlandish to get people to click or pick up a copy and read it.

The media spins and lies to SELL something to you, and if it drives your emotions you get a chemical response in your body that quickly becomes an addiction, thus you go back for more. Then they make money off your emotional co-dependency.

The truthful news is hard to find, and not on a mainstream site, if even published in the public domain at all.

Essentially, ya'll are getting up in arms about stuff that is written to do exactly that, lie and divide.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

I'm old enough and have experienced more reality in my 67 years than 90% of the souls on this site. Have you ever spent 2 of the coldest winters on record for a period of time in an old house built in 1905 that had no running water or heat and the north wind whistles through the wall like they weren't even there. An old wood stove that burns out before it even begins to heat the room and you are lying there with a toboggin on your head and pillow on that trying to stay warm. I have. Have you ever hand dug a 36 inch diameter well 27 feet deep without tile lining just to get water in that house? I have. Have you ever worked in an environment so hot that you burn your arms if they touch anything metal? I have. Don't preach reality to me. I have lived it. I resent the pansy asses that think they know reality but the worst thing in their lives is when their computer game crashes. Today's newer generations don't know sheat about reality.

a reply to: CharlesT

I'm old enough and have experienced more reality in my 67 years than 90% of the souls on this site.

and that matters because.....?

Have you ever spent 2 of the coldest winters on record for a period of time in an old house built in 1905 that had no running water or heat and the north wind whistles through the wall like they weren't even there.

errrr no I think the house I slept in that winter was build in 1878

I have. Have you ever hand dug a 36 inch diameter well 27 feet deep without tile lining just to get water in that house?

nope, but am really starting to wonder what this has to do with Trump and your qualifications as a psychiatrist

Have you ever worked in an environment so hot that you burn your arms if they touch anything metal? I have

errr, yeah actually check, ave done that one but was this part of your state psychiatry exam?

Don't preach reality to me. I have lived it. I resent the pansy asses that think they know reality but the worst thing in their lives is when their computer game crashes. Today's newer generations don't know sheat about reality.

Don't think I was preaching reality to anyone although you seem to be doing that enough for both of us.....

Dude if you want to talk to me about reality we can talk about the old mans hand I held yesterday while he was dying or the smell inside the Vatican, how about the chill on the alps or falling in love in a cozy coffee shop and standing in the middle of a packed stadium feeling the music vibrate through me.

We could talk all day about that...

but....

ITS OFF TOPIC!!

just like your silly childish insults about people who disagree with you politically being somehow mentally deranged so how about rather than telling us all your life story you stick to the topic at hand and if you don't have anything to add to it then perhaps you shouldn't be posting.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Xtrozero

Again I am not talking about Obamas polls I am talking about Trumps not a comparison between the two.

All I will say is that overall when you compare how Obama's poles and Trumps polls were running, they seem to indicate that Obama was only slightly ahead. Although he did spend some time up in the 60%' range, Trump is really struggled to even break 50% yet.

Although like I keep saying thats just one indicator of his popularity.

When you say Trump is unpopular with no other content then there is just not much to it...I can say most Presidents have been unpopular with the same factual statement. Obama started his Presidency with like a crazy 69% popular number.


As we talk about population, yes Hillary took about 5 million more votes in CA and that too is a crazy number when we talk about one state vs 49 others and then look at the popular vote compared to electoral college. We also know the vast majority of the media and Hollywood is very liberal base and we can all remember Obama could not do wrong in their eyes..he walk out in front of them like their favorite rock star. EVERYONE wanted our first black President to be successful...time proved otherwise.

It seems today many WANT Trump to fail...no matter what, no matter the cost, and that started about 5 seconds after he hit 270 EV. No matter how good Trump is he will always be that crotch grabbing ass who prevented our first female President for at least 50% of the voting population...now compare that to the rock star Obama and people still want to talk popularity polls for some reason...lol

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Roll on dude. You got me pard. Have a great day.

a reply to: Lysergic

You already got all over your face, go clean yourself up.

Got what all over their face?
The look of wisdom?