It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Report: Mueller Has Offered Tony Podesta Immunity To Testify In Manafort Case

page: 2
27
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 03:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: loam

WTF
Some get charged and some dont?


That is not the type of immunity given. The unknown persons are getting "use immunity". It just means they can say things on the stand and prosecutors cant use that testimony in the future. It does not prevent charges. It is used as a work around to people who would plead the 5th but their testimony is need in other cases.
edit on 20-7-2018 by Pyle because: More context.




posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 04:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Which effectively makes it impossible to successfully prosecute them.



posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 05:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Pyle

Which effectively makes it impossible to successfully prosecute them.



No it doesnt. They just cant use the testimony as evidence. Everything else is still fair game.



posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 09:25 AM
link   
mistake
edit on 20-7-2018 by CosmicAwakening because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   
What happens if this is not true? Tucker Carlson quits?

Yeah right? He gets paid to sow disinfo. You guys wanna guess who Tucker's two sources are?

I'm gonna go with True Pundit, and then the claims are made even more solid by Gateway Pundit, or maybe Daily Caller or Neon Nettle. Any slightly more credible news organization should have another source beside Tucker Carlson if they want to repeat this.

Now, don't get me wrong, there is a chance this is true, everything has a chance of being true, it's a crazy world -- but consider the sources, please. Consider where this started and where it's continuing.

So, on topic question for everyone: If this turns out a hoax and Tucker Carlson fell for a hoax and staked his credibility on it, can we even re-post Tucker on here as credible? Should we?



posted on Jul, 20 2018 @ 01:54 PM
link   
Ah, so Mueller is using indictments that have nothing to do with Russian interference in the election to grant immunity to Clinton associates. Clever way of protecting them.
What a farce.



posted on Jul, 21 2018 @ 06:58 AM
link   
a reply to: loam

This was already leaked. No surprise.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 02:09 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Indeed.

If this is true this reveals everything we need to know,
Sure looks like Mueller and his investigation are
The infamous "insurance policy".....



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 07:08 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I can't find where these witnesses have been charged with anything. So no there are no plea deals.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 07:11 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

This is not about taxes. It's about working as a foreign agent and not declaring.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

No witnesses have been named but thr story does say that these witnesses have not been charged with anything.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 07:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Ah, so Mueller is using indictments that have nothing to do with Russian interference in the election to grant immunity to Clinton associates. Clever way of protecting them.
What a farce.


You have not been reading the thread, have you? Clinton associates can be charged, but their testimony cannot be used against them.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 07:25 AM
link   
a reply to: loam

Remember when the Podesta's connections to Manafort were proof of something? Looks like we are about to find out what.



posted on Jul, 22 2018 @ 08:35 AM
link   
a reply to: loam

Prosecute who for what?
None of these witnesses have been charged with anything.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 09:32 AM
link   
a reply to: loam

Soooo. Daily Caller got it all wrong again.
The five witnesses have been named and as I said none of them are known to the general public.
They are bankers and accountants who worked on his taxes and finances. My accountant signs my tax return on the line that says prepared but not audited to protect himself from any laws I might have broken. Normal for them to request immunity so they are not liable for crimes that Manafort committed in his tax returns.
So boring I know. Sometimes the story just isn't as exciting as some imaginations.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 09:37 AM
link   
a reply to: loam

Well it's just his accountants and bankers so I guess they don't really have anything to charge them with. This is professional insurance that they won't be liable for any tax fraud Manafort might have perpetrated. Not that any prosecutors would be looking to do that anyway.



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 09:50 AM
link   

The witnesses, who Mueller's team submitted for immunity last week and whose identities were not released publicly until Monday, are James Brennan, Donna Duggan, Conor O'Brien, Cindy Laporta and Dennis Raico



thehill.com...



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 10:12 AM
link   
There's more grants ask for.

These 5 are only the beginning.

🤫



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope.

James Brennan, Donna Duggan, Conor O'Brien, Cindy Laporta and Dennis Raico



posted on Jul, 24 2018 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

He also asked for over seventy blank subpeonas. Lots of people have stories to tell.
The cops are at the door.



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join