Report: Mueller Has Offered Tony Podesta Immunity To Testify In Manafort Case

Report: Mueller Has Offered Tony Podesta Immunity To Testify In Manafort Case

Special counsel Robert Mueller has offered Clinton-connected superlobbyist Tony Podesta immunity in order to testify against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, according to Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

“Tonight we can report exclusively based on two separate sources we spoke to today that Tony Podesta has been offered immunity by Robert Mueller to testify against Paul Manafort,” reported Carlson.

If true, the circus is only just getting started. Hopefully, it isn't.

Double standard indeed.

a reply to: loam

WTF
Some get charged and some dont?

Pretty much proves Podesta is guilty of related crimes.

Exposed 💥😎💥

Well, if this is spot on, Trump just needs to pardon him.

Send a clear message that anything you can do, I can do better...

originally posted by: BestinShow
Well, if this is spot on, Trump just needs to pardon him.

Send a clear message that anything you can do, I can do better...

Or as an October surprise, Trump can just declassify all the documents and let the chips fall where they may.

Not really going to happen, but thinking about it puts me in a happy place in my head...

I remember reading somewhere
"Plants need water"

a reply to: loam

Tucker Carlson covered the potential Podesta immunity....



Shady swamp for sure...

a reply to: loam

It's easy to see what's happening here, if this is true. The investigators, obviously compromised, are waiting as long as they can, to make it look like they're doing something. Then they trot out their known associates and give them plea deals, so they can railroad people for political impact.

I hope there are investigators investigating Sideshow Bob's team of crazy criminal wackjobs, because every one of those immunity deals will be null and void if they find out.

Cheers - Dave

What would Tony Podesta know about Paul Manafort's income tax evasions?

This is very informative, regarding the POTENTIAL immunity deal request.

When the judge (T.S. Ellis) presiding over Paul Manafort‘s case in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) suddenly halted proceedings Monday afternoon, some experts speculated that it might be a sign Manafort was preparing to cut a deal. It turns out that five witnesses cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller‘s investigation are the ones seeking a deal.

In a Tuesday filing, Mueller asked Judge T.S. Ellis III to grant those five unnamed witnesses immunity, which is obviously a big deal. One does not simply seek immunity when one has something good to say.

The immunity demand will have to be granted if these witnesses are going to take the stand, the filing says. If they don’t get immunity, they will either not testify or invoke their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

That’s not all. Mueller and his prosecutors are also asking that filings containing information about these witnesses be sealed. Mueller said that sealing of these documents is necessary to protect the identities of “uncharged third parties,” to prevent “undue harassment,” and to prevent “reputational harm.”

From: lawandcrime.com...

www.washingtontimes.com... guess its making its way through the media now

Special counsel Robert Mueller has reportedly given a key Democratic operative immunity to testify against former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. According to Tucker Carlson, speaking Thursday evening on his Fox News program, Mr. Mueller has offered immunity to Tony Podesta, founder of the Podesta Group and brother of former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. Mr. Carlson cited “two sources” whom he did not name. Both Mr. Manafort and the Podesta Group worked on a campaign named the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, and most of the charges against Mr. Manafort relate to his work there and whether he laundered money for Russian oligarchs, worked as a foreign agent, disclosed his income and status, and related issues. Mr. Carlson also complained of a political double standard, repeating a claim he had made last October that Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group had committed at least some of thos

unconfirmed sourced makes me nervous but if this ends up being true expect republicans to be furious and this will pretty much rally their base and maybe some independents before midterms

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: loam

Tucker Carlson covered the potential Podesta immunity....

Shady swamp for sure...

That guy on the left, I saw him in a sketch somewhere...

a reply to: loam

Hillary's and Trump's campaign chairmen are thick as thieves eh?

Whodathunkit

a reply to: loam


LOL..Mueller wanted to keep this SECRET. Or, maybe not. Big chess game in play.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: loam


LOL..Mueller wanted to keep this SECRET. Or, maybe not. Big chess game in play.

Yeah, it's like 20d chess maaan!

Face it, you supposed woke people have absolutely no idea.

a reply to: carewemust

Since the judge has yet to rule, if Podesta isn't harassed, does that mean Mueller's motion to keep the identities of those he plans to provide immunity to under wraps is no longer valid?

originally posted by: Chadwickus

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: loam


LOL..Mueller wanted to keep this SECRET. Or, maybe not. Big chess game in play.

Yeah, it's like 20d chess maaan!

Face it, you supposed woke people have absolutely no idea.

What's your idea of the strategy?

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: carewemust

Since the judge has yet to rule, if Podesta isn't harassed, does that mean Mueller's motion to keep the identities of those he plans to provide immunity to under wraps no longer valid?

Yeah..it's like "There's no there there", yet.

Did you hear about the photos of evidence against Paul Manafort, that Bob Mueller published last night?
www.bloomberg.com...

a reply to: carewemust

I hadn't seen that.

This one made me laugh and cry:

Airbnb listings and renovations for a condominium that Manafort offered to renters in the Soho neighborhood of New York, despite saying in a mortgage application that it wasn’t a rental property, prosecutors say

Rent out a condo on the sly and you're public enemy number one... Put national security secrets on a private email server, exposing them to foreign agents, lie about it, and then try to hide that fact by deleting everything and destroying the hardware gets you nada.

You couldn't even present this stuff as fiction.

a reply to: loam


It should be illegal that an all-powerful SPECIAL counsel is using millions of our tax dollars to prosecute tax-evaders and liars. A newly-minted prosecutor could do that.

a reply to: Chadwickus