Stuff the USA media will not show!

originally posted by: CigaretteByrnes
Shhhhhh....they're busy jerking each other off/consoling each other. This racist dummy xBWOMPx has been on fire these last few days.

Hater club is growing, you want in on this Barney? sounds like your seeking some attention!?!? Or you can go back to drinking the CNN's spiked punch

a reply to: TrueBrit

Yeah, how many were hired? You do know most socialist liberals are leaches and dont have a job, so it would make sense there would be more ATTENDING rally's considering most republicans believe in hard work and reward, so most were probably too busy working to attend, you know how that goes

a reply to: xBWOMPx

Hey... you know, you might want to rethink baiting people into arguments, rather than debate.

I mean, that would necessitate you suddenly becoming capable of debate, leave alone winning one, or for that matter a single point within the context of a proper discussion, but its better to at least try and fail, than give up and reduce everything to a scat flinging match.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

How do you know how many socialist liberals have and have not got a job?

You could not possibly know that about your own swampy mess of a place, leave alone about mine. If you could, there would be a very significant problem with voter information security. Its not accurate anyway, I am just curious as to how you came to the conclusions you have.

You see, in this country, those of a socialist mindset are often very hard working, but utterly unrewarded for their time, which is one of the things which pushes them to understand the importance of unionisation and solidarity, as well as being part of the foundation of their education into the real meaning of capitalism, as it pertains to the effect on the ground level worker.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Your the one looking for an argument like you have something to prove, so, prove it... I posted a couple videos that media neglects to show, im sure there are much more but If that hurt your feelings I am far from sorry and would advise for you to grow some thick skin... But anyways, proceed, what is this "DEBATE" or "ARGUMENT" you would loooove to have with me???

a reply to: xBWOMPx

"Stuff the USA media will not show!"

It's called the truth!

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: xBWOMPx

How do you know how many socialist liberals have and have not got a job?

You could not possibly know that about your own swampy mess of a place, leave alone about mine. If you could, there would be a very significant problem with voter information security. Its not accurate anyway, I am just curious as to how you came to the conclusions you have.

You see, in this country, those of a socialist mindset are often very hard working, but utterly unrewarded for their time, which is one of the things which pushes them to understand the importance of unionisation and solidarity, as well as being part of the foundation of their education into the real meaning of capitalism, as it pertains to the effect on the ground level worker.

To your first question its very obvious, why do you think Democrats bait liberals with free everything??? Anyway, I get it, you believe in Marxism, you believe last place gets a trophy, you believe while some work very hard there are those who dont but get equal pay... I dont care for that kinda crap nor Marxism, you can have it, keep it. What you find as gold I see as garbage, so what. You wont change my mind and I wont change yours so drive on.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: xBWOMPx

"Stuff the USA media will not show!"

It's called the truth!

That's all I was pointing out, then Brit had to come in and get all sensitive about it like I was wrong for showing those videos.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

To your first question its very obvious, why do you think Democrats bait liberals with free everything???

They don't. They insist that certain things should be guaranteed regardless of ones status of birth. Things like a good education, healthcare without cost at point of issue, access to gainful, I repeat and emphasize GAINFUL employment, or, in the event that one is unable to work because of injury, birth defect, illness or other verifiable disability, a stipend paid by society, to promote the independence of that person, and to ensure their dignity.

Those things are not free, instead they are paid for by taxation, which has some very positive effects. First of all, because the government purchases the goods and services necessary to provide those things, they purchase those goods and services in bulk and at a lower cost for the same quality, than a private entity would charge the individual. That is the first benefit, comparatively. The second benefit is that if every child can be educated well, regardless of their parents financial status, this means that the entirety of the intellectual potential of a nation under that system, can theoretically be accessed, expanded and bought to its maximum effectiveness, when it comes time for that child to become an adult, and join the workforce in whatever capacity they might find themselves doing so. It also means that the adult that child becomes, will have a rounded ability to know enough to make good decisions in their life, about how to spend their money, what kind of work they would like to be doing, what kind of further education they might like to get involved in. It also means that they will be less prone to leading a difficult and confusing life, as a result of the fact that their education will be provided in a manner which successfully prepares them for their adulthood.

Healthcare being paid for by taxation, once again, means that EVERYONE can access the service, at any time, free of charge directly. Yes, a fraction of their tax/national insurance contribution will pay for the treatment and the drugs which are required, but in effect, this means that people can be healed without having to be millionaires. Health and wellness are not luxuries, they are necessities.

Anyway, I get it, you believe in Marxism, you believe last place gets a trophy, you believe while some work very hard there are those who dont but get equal pay.

This is yet another fallacy that the right have about socialism. Those who do not work, have to have a reason not to work, that qualifies them to be supported, despite their inability to contribute to the system. If they are merely UNWILLING to contribute to the system, that is a different matter, and there are rules which govern how those trying to game the system are to be dealt with, including jail terms in some serious cases. Its worth mentioning that people gaming the system under social responsibility programs, account for a statistically irrelevant amount of the population, and cost the government (therefore the people) a commensurately statistically irrelevant amount of money. What does cost the people a great deal of money, is the tendency of enormous, global corporations, paying little to no tax, despite doing an awful lot of business. This promotes monopolies in private industry, which is something that people on the right complain about, unless they are actually making money from the big mergers, and the habit of the big corporations to pay nothing in tax.

Socialism also holds that the collective of the people is the power, not the state, or indeed the government. It holds that the government must in all things and in all ways, be subservient to the peoples will, and only derive power at all, from the people, a power that can be denied to that government at any time, for any reason the people see fit.

You feel free to drive on too, but do educate yourself somewhat. Debate with a dullard is tiresome, and argument with one even more so.

a reply to: TrueBrit

I know what socialism is, the difference between you and i is i dont always seek for my answers on google, so stop wasting your time with me if you know so well and im a dullard.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

I did not use google for any of that.

The day I need to refer to some corporatist abortion of a site, to give me a description of the structure I favour, will be a cold one in hell.

Why would the media give air time to EDL scum?
Did American media broadcast KKK gatherings back in the 60's and 70's? I think not.

a reply to: xBWOMPx
Thanks for the clips, I don't watch the lamestream media anymore, they're Parrots on the Payroll nowdays.

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
Why would the media give air time to EDL scum?
Did American media broadcast KKK gatherings back in the 60's and 70's? I think not.

Wow, y'all really blow my mind, Nazi's were socialist (the LEFT were communist and the RIGHT were socialist back before WWII started, true story), the democratic party started the KKK, no they never flippy floppied, Hillary was best buds with the head of the KKK. Anyway, there were no nazi's in the video, you are horribly mistaken with reality. You see Liberals going to republican rally's all the time and trying to silence them and shut them down but you never see republicans go to liberal rally's trying to silence them and shut them down, I really dont care to watch a Soro's crowd for hire of fake Nazi's either so dont even try. Anyway, "some" liberal groups and Antifa are Fascist but yet they scream and cry of hating Fascism while they are trying to silence people, pretty F****** stupid if you ask me!

Man, you know it's bad for the left when a pro Trump rally in the UK of all places garners more people than any Antifa rally/protest in the USA. How pathetic are these people? WOW.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

You are talking nonsense again.

The Nazis chose their name, because they knew it would draw support from an already existent, healthy, worker oriented socialist base, which had no representation in government at the time, not because their ideology actually contained any real socialism at all. This was done because it would allow them to take advantage of the socialists as a workforce, while subverting the ideals of that group. What they did do in terms of social programs, were done to lend a false legitimacy to their claims of being a socialist movement. The actual socialists, who recoiled in horror upon discovering the nature of the Nazi ideal, and that their support for that party had resulted in horrors beyond imagining, suffered a fate very similar to that of the Jews, Gypsies, Muslims, persons of colour and so on and so forth, in that they were killed in large numbers, or at the very least taken off the street and kept in prisons and camps.

There is no way for an organisation to actually be both socialist, and hypernationalist. These positions are mutually exclusive in every respect, because it is socially irresponsible to be rampantly hypernationalist, and hypernationalists do not accept socialist principles in the slightest bit.

Get an education, and stop this hackery you are engaged in.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

Wow, y'all really blow my mind, Nazi's were socialist

Blow me? You posted two clips from alleged Pro-Trump-rallys, which turned out to be other events and thus your thread seems to be a tad misleading. Let's keep ignoring that part though, cuz... ya know... reasons!

This retarded "Nazis are socialists" spin works like a charme in order to derail your own threads once they blew up in your face. I'll give you that.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

Truth is most sensible souls from the UK with half a brain hate Trump and everything he stands for, hence the demonstration a day before, with somewhat more support and numbers, and a hell of a lot less anger and aggression displayed.

Show whatever you wish mate but for chrissake add some meaningful context.

The majority of the British people consider the Man to be a dangerous racist buffoon.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xBWOMPx


Thank-you for the clip. People all over the world WANT what President Trump is delivering for America and other sections of the planet. Stronger economy and peace between nations. Only fools protest against those things.

This is what "they" feared the most... Trumpism is catching on! Even with all the attempts to smear, the people are seeing right through it. It's like I've been saying, people have wanted Real Change not that weak # Obama was peddling! Now that it's here, many if us are elated, others still don't get it, they're Confused, their standard orthodox masters are being displaced and the unpredictability and unfamiliarity of the adventure of freedom frightens them. At least under slavery they knew what to expect, all the good guys and bad guys were clearly defined, life was just simpler. But, like patriots in the years approaching 1776, we arent afraid at all to wrest the wheel away from our captors and steer our destiny onto the heading WE choose! Freedom Loving People of the World, UNITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: xBWOMPx

Truth is most sensible souls from the UK with half a brain hate Trump and everything he stands for, hence the demonstration a day before, with somewhat more support and numbers, and a hell of a lot less anger and aggression displayed.

Show whatever you wish mate but for chrissake add some meaningful context.

The majority of the British people consider the Man to be a dangerous racist buffoon.

We know that.

We know that 30,000 does not equal the majority of "The British people".

So what's your point? He was biased by not showing what can be seen Everywhere else you look?

Or maybe you know that was indeed a sizable crowd and that makes you uncomfortable, so you really are just trying to comfort yourself by repeating comforting "truths".

Yes we know there is work to be done. We know there are still a scary amount of people who wish to stay on the same agenda that is destroying us. More of the same is fine for you, huh? I suppose you think we were on our way to a near utopia with progressive policies? Things were eventually gonna get better, is that it? We just needed to stay the course is that it?

If you want to talk about what the majority of the British people think, well, they voted for Brexit did they not? Sounds like they agree more with Trump in at least Some ways...