Trump Shouldn't Eschew Results to Appease the Outrage of a Few Prigs

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Lol. Here's the phone number #tard - 01772 89442

I don't want your digits, David. Your true colors are good enough for laimsme.

Fact check it, bitch. Phone them up, get facts instead of lying and assuming. Why refuse evidence to verify my claims based on pure ignorant assumption. It's pure transparency and oferring independent verificatuion of my claims yet you refuse it based on your bias.

Used to live with the head of GCHQs daughter in an SIS house: www.dsei.co.uk... Never got caught or bowed to intimidation. I'm no wall flower State wise.

Unless you can provide similar proof of education, career, expertise etc.... I'll maintain my opinion you don't have a clue what you're talking about when it comes to the media.

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Lol. Here's the phone number #tard - 01772 89442

I don't want your digits, David. Your true colors are good enough for me.

Fact check it, bitch. Used to live with the head of GCHQs daughter in an SIS house: www.dsei.co.uk...

I don't care. I'll even give you the benefit of the doubt. What I'm not going to do is pretend to be impressed nor give you any leeway because you think you're elite.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Lol. Here's the phone number #tard - 01772 89442

I don't want your digits, David. Your true colors are good enough for me.

Fact check it, bitch. Used to live with the head of GCHQs daughter in an SIS house: www.dsei.co.uk...

I don't care. I'll even give you the benefit of the doubt. What I'm not going to do is pretend to be impressed nor give you any leeway because you think you're elite.

I don't consider myself elite, I don't dress my language in pointless appeals to elitism by citing Latin or unintelligible nomenclature .


I spent nearly 30 years in the industry - shock of all horrors I naturally have more experience than the general public. Does that make me superior? No. Just means I had far more time and resources to understand the topics and function of news from the inside.

My bookshelf has at least 100 journalism academic books, I don't expect or myself as better than the Average Joe, just a person who specialised in Journalism and received a few hundred thousand in training over the years.

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Lol. Here's the phone number #tard - 01772 89442

I don't want your digits, David. Your true colors are good enough for me.

Fact check it, bitch. Used to live with the head of GCHQs daughter in an SIS house: www.dsei.co.uk...

I don't care. I'll even give you the benefit of the doubt. What I'm not going to do is pretend to be impressed nor give you any leeway because you think you're elite.

I don't consider myself elite, I don't dress my language in pointless appeals to elitism by pointlessly citing Latin or unintelligible nomenclature.

But you'll point to your faint declarations of your education and CV as proof of your authority. Again, I could care less.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Faint? It's fact, phone them up. What makes you think I want to impress you? You've made a complete tit of yourself and clearly have no understanding of news media.

a reply to: bastion

Faint? It's fact, phone them up. What makes you think I want to impress you? You've made a complete tit of yourself and clearly have no understanding of news media.

I'm not phoning anyone. I already said I'd give you the benefit of the doubt. None of your appeals to authority, your strawmen, your deflections, do anything to change my mind. In fact, it makes my opinion of you much lower.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Faint? It's fact, phone them up. What makes you think I want to impress you? You've made a complete tit of yourself and clearly have no understanding of news media.

I'm not phoning anyone. I already said I'd give you the benefit of the doubt. None of your appeals to authority, your strawmen, your deflections, do anything to change my mind. In fact, it makes my opinion of you much lower.

Now that I have seen the overwhelming evidence you presented for your claims I appoligise on behalf of every person who has ever had an education.

You're completely right, an absolute genius. Lets fire all surgeons and replace them with people with no medical education as they're cheaper and will obviously do a far better job than trained people who have passed quality tests.

Naturally I assume you'll be their first volunteer given your trust in people with no practical or theoretical knowledge of the subject at hand.

I'm sorry providing phone numbers to prove my expertise makes you think lower of me because you refuse to phone and verify them.

Diddums.

a reply to: bastion

Another strawman. I suggested no such thing.

No, David, I think lower of you because you are appealing to your accomplishments as if I should care, when you've made a pretty elementary, pretty amateur non-sequitur in to push an easily-refuted lie. I'm sure you're a benefit to the profession.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Another strawman. I suggested no such thing.

No, David, I think lower of you because you are appealing to your accomplishments as if I should care, when you've made a pretty elementary, pretty amateur non-sequitur in to push an easily-refuted lie. I'm sure you're a benefit to the profession.

Nah you just have no knowledge of journalism or logical process and have provided nothing to back your assertion it's an amateur easily refutable non-sequitur lie. You claim to follow and understand logic yet have provided no evidence to back it up, where's the logic in that?

Personally I don 't assume some delusional Internet random is an expert just because they claim they are and cite the first thing that 'agrees' with them typing '90% negative coverage of Trump' on Google. I prefer transparency and evidence like the phone numbers I've provided and brief portfolio.

I don't take advice on logic from people who refuse to independently verify info to see if my claims are fact or fiction, and instead celebrate their bias and ignorance. Marked enough work from 14 - 16 year olds to spot bollocks masquerading as appeals to intelligence.

Come up with a new basis for Eigen Vectors and Partial Differentiation maybe I'll consider you have an elementary understanding of logic. Until then I'll still be under the firm stance you know nothing about either subject.

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: bastion

Another strawman. I suggested no such thing.

No, David, I think lower of you because you are appealing to your accomplishments as if I should care, when you've made a pretty elementary, pretty amateur non-sequitur in to push an easily-refuted lie. I'm sure you're a benefit to the profession.

Nah you just have no knowledge of journalism or logical process and have provided nothing to back your assertion it's an amateur easily refutable non-sequitur lie. You claim to follow and understand logic yet have provided no evidence to back it up, where's the logic in that?

Personally I don 't assume some delusional Internet random is an expert just because they claim they are and cite the first thing that 'agrees' with them typing '90% negative coverage of Trump' on Google. I prefer transparency and evidence like the phone numbers I've provided and brief portfolio.

I don't take advice on logic from people who refuse to independently verify info to see if my claims are fact or fiction, and instead celebrate their bias and ignorance. Marked enough work from 14 - 16 year olds to spot bollocks masquerading as appeals to intelligence.

Come up with a new basis for Eigen Vectors and Partial Differentiation maybe I'll consider you have an elementary understanding of logic. Until then I'll still be under the firm stance you know nothing about either subject.

Genetic fallacy, times an appeal of authority, times a non-sequitur, times straw men—David, you have nothing to support your wild accusations save for your promises that you know and I don’t. The fact that you claim to be a journalist for the very publications who take part in the negative reporting, further discredits your specious non-sequitur.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Yet again no evidence, no sources, no credibility, no understanding of logic, basic errors, mistaking reductio ad absurdum and knowledge with 'stawmewn' and 'appeals to authority', no eigen vectors, no Hessian matrices, no CDA, no career in the industry, false accusations of working for biased news/negative news when employed by the most respected independent in the world.

0/10 - Must try harder - like I said using faux-latin and 'idjuts gide to logik' isn't evidence. Try using evidence in future. My credentials are posted for all to see and numbers provided allowing anyone to verify I know the industry. Where are yours? (I alreadyknow you have none due to previous posts). Your post reads llike a 'my first cookbook' with the recipe ingredients replaced with words you don't understand but think sound intellectual.

a reply to: bastion

Hahahahaha.
Oh and Les give it up you have been owned you just can not accept it.

originally posted by: cosmickat
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Seriously

Trump supporters need a refresh on their playbook.
All this sheet is getting old.

Trump fecks up again.....
We have a rush of posts on here blaming ..... ( in no particular order )

The Left
The Libs
The Media
The Fake News
The Clintons
The Obama
The made up TDS
Etc..etc ad nauseum


I like to call it Dee - Fleckt - Shone ( say this in your Trump voice )
It means you have no argument...why can't you just own it.
Say " our boy fecked up " and move on. Instead of trying to blame everything and everyone else who is questioning his suitability for the role.
Maybe he isn't the perfect POTUS after all...and he is a long way from MAGA.
Maybe, in fact, he is just another puppet but not a very adept one.

There is more chance of Trump re-igniting a cold war ..or worse...the longer he is allowed to continue with his moronic antics. He is the biggest danger to the US.

Sorry you can't see that.

Wait sooooo its either collusion or he reignites the cold war?

Help me see that more clearly.

originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Yet again no evidence, no sources, no credibility, no understanding of logic, basic errors, mistaking reductio ad absurdum and knowledge with 'stawmewn' and 'appeals to authority', no eigen vectors, no Hessian matrices, no CDA, no career in the industry, false accusations of working for biased news/negative news when employed by the most respected independent in the world.

0/10 - Must try harder - like I said using faux-latin and 'idjuts gide to logik' isn't evidence. Try using evidence in future. My credentials are posted for all to see and numbers provided allowing anyone to verify I know the industry. Where are yours? (I alreadyknow you have none due to previous posts). Your post reads llike a 'my first cookbook' with the recipe ingredients replaced with words you don't understand but think sound intellectual.

Your evidence that Donald Trump isn’t hated by the media is evidence that Donald Trump is friends with Rupert Murdoch. Again, non-sequitur.

You can have all the credentials in the world, but your logic, your so called evidence, is wrong. With all your credentials, your self-proclaimed expertise, you still couldn’t make a proper argument.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: bastion

Hahahahaha.
Oh and Les give it up you have been owned you just can not accept it.

No, don’t tell him that he will start another thread about free speech and call people puritans

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: bastion

Hahahahaha.
Oh and Les give it up you have been owned you just can not accept it.

No, don’t tell him that he will start another thread about free speech and call people puritans

And you will be crying in it.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: bastion

Hahahahaha.
Oh and Les give it up you have been owned you just can not accept it.

No, don’t tell him that he will start another thread about free speech and call people puritans

And you will be crying in it.

You will be crying all over your keyboard writing it, and others will be crying in laughter readin it

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: bastion

Hahahahaha.
Oh and Les give it up you have been owned you just can not accept it.

No, don’t tell him that he will start another thread about free speech and call people puritans

And you will be crying in it.

You will be crying all over your keyboard writing it, and others will be crying in laughter readin it

I’m here for your entertainment.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Let me congratulate you on doing such a fine job

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Let me congratulate you on doing such a fine job

Very kind. Thank you.