It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Metallicus
Yep.
Op wants to break the law to get what they want.
In other words.
Same snip different day same party.
LOL!
Cmon Kharron, like every MSM DNC etc hatchetman wouldnt have already leaked the stuff if there was such a backdoor... better yet if there was actually something there?
This whole 'ordeal' is but a merry go round gimmick to keep the herd bewildered. All of US. Its what DC critters do.
originally posted by: Kharron
A lot of assumptions in here... what'd we'd find, who'd already seen it... that by asking for transparency one is asking for hate.
All of you who have responded, answer me one question, directly... no deflecting or twisting things around.
- Do you think the People deserve to know who is representing them and how they're being represented?
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: toysforadults
is there a backdoor to the FISA warrant and DNC server?
We, the People, sue the government and try to find back-doors when the government is being opaque and not wanting to be open. Or when agents of the government do things out of the ordinary and draw attention to themselves. Transparency is a good thing. Wouldn't you agree?
originally posted by: CharlesT
originally posted by: Kharron
A lot of assumptions in here... what'd we'd find, who'd already seen it... that by asking for transparency one is asking for hate.
All of you who have responded, answer me one question, directly... no deflecting or twisting things around.
- Do you think the People deserve to know who is representing them and how they're being represented?
My opinion is based on his performance in office and I'm well satisfied so far. You find a rich business person that hasn't stretched the fine line and I'll pat you on the head and say well done little one.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Kharron
If there was anything "Damning" in Trump's tax returns, it would have been leaked and "verified" in Oct 2016.
The fact that it wasn't means .... pfftt 💥😃💥
originally posted by: toysforadults
www.taxhistory.org...
here is the number of candidates who have released their tax returns, hint it's not many
originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Kharron
So you would be accepting of this tactic being used to access your private information correct? Big brother needs to come into our homes to protect us from big brother.
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: Kharron
It's a 110% guarantee that if there was any one thing in any one of Trump's tax returns that could sink him, it would have been out over a year and a half ago.