It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Where was the outrage when China and Russia hacked McCain and Obama?

page: 1
21
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+6 more 
posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Obama and McCain were hacked yet Obama still wanted a reset with Russia and told the Russian President he would be more flexible after the election. Here's an article from 2008.

Obama, McCain computers 'hacked' during election campaign


Hackers broke into the computer systems of the Barack Obama and John McCain campaign teams during the US presidential race and stole a ''serious amount of files" in an operation that US government cyber experts believe originated from China.

The Secret Service and FBI warned Obama and McCain earlier this year that their computer networks had been infiltrated by foreign hackers who downloaded large quantities of information from the campaign networks.

"You have been compromised, and a serious amount of files have been loaded off your system," an FBI agent said, according to a report in Newsweek magazine.

The report went on to say that technical experts speculated the hackers were Russian or Chinese. The FBI apparently told Obama the attack had not been carried out by political opponents.


www.theguardian.com...

Like Rand Paul said we do it more than other Countries. We install puppet Governments. Here's an article from the LA Times:

The U.S. is no stranger to interfering in the elections of other countries


The U.S. has a long history of attempting to influence presidential elections in other countries – it's done so as many as 81 times between 1946 and 2000, according to a database amassed by political scientist Dov Levin of Carnegie Mellon University.

That number doesn't include military coups and regime change efforts following the election of candidates the U.S. didn't like, notably those in Iran, Guatemala and Chile. Nor does it include general assistance with the electoral process, such as election monitoring.


www.latimes.com...

This is about the election not Russia. Democrats, the media and never Trumpers are ready to start WW3 with Russia because Clinton lost the election. Trump committed the unforgivable sin. He won the election and embarrassed the media. If you watch election night videos, you will see they were gleeful when the exit polls came in and they though Clinton would win. The glee turned to dread around 10 PM.

Watch this epic take down of Wolf Blitzer by Rand Paul. The hatred in Wolf's face tells you everything you need to know.



edit on 16-7-2018 by neoholographic because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 10:40 PM
link   


Where was the outrage when China and Russia hacked McCain and Obama?

All on lunch break ?




posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 10:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog



Where was the outrage when China and Russia hacked McCain and Obama?

All on lunch break ?



LOL, good one!



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 10:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic


Watch this epic take down of Wolf Blitzer by Rand Paul. The hatred in Wolf's face tells you everything you need to know.




Rand Destroyed poor little Wolf. Even he saw how unhinged he was getting. Two TDS references too. Well done Sen. Paul.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 10:55 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic


That's what it comes down to.

Hillary still can't take responsibility for her losing the election.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:20 PM
link   
Way to stand tall, Senator Paul. His Daddy was supportive today too.

TDS just got called out on fake news. Sweet. TDS is real y'all!



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:27 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

We are not upset that Clinton lost the election. We are upset that she even ran. But come 2020 there will be a new face. One that cannot be trifled with. If you pay close attention Democrats are slowly stepping away from this bull snip about Trump. They are preparing for this lady that WILL win if she decides to run. And there is NOTHING the Republican Party can throw at her.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:28 PM
link   
Best interview from Rand Paul that I’ve seen in a while. I’m interested to see what kind of ATSer responses/counters that his points generate... (eta: if any)
edit on 7/16/2018 by japhrimu because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Allaroundyou

What lady are you referring to?



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: neoholographic

We are not upset that Clinton lost the election. We are upset that she even ran. But come 2020 there will be a new face. One that cannot be trifled with. If you pay close attention Democrats are slowly stepping away from this bull snip about Trump. They are preparing for this lady that WILL win if she decides to run. And there is NOTHING the Republican Party can throw at her.




SWEET!

Sophia Vergara is running!



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:33 PM
link   
The world should make a foreign country trying to influence elections illegal. This includes countries that are allies trying to influence their allies elections too. That happens a lot everywhere. An Ex-president of the US endorses a candidate of a foreign country fairly often, that should be illegal too. Our citizens should be choosing our government, not France and Germany's leaders. They are presently showing negativity towards Trump which goes down to the Republican party. The Germans and other European countries should not try to steer our people into voting Democrat in the upcoming election. We should make a law that governs this practice.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:38 PM
link   
You know that Key and Peele skit series with Obama and his translator?

Imagine Trump and Rand Paul instead: Trump says what Trump says about witch hunt, but then Rand Paul is there to translate, as he did here...

Obvious differences and it’s kinda inverted/twisted, I know, but that’s not the point.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:42 PM
link   
Wolf Blitzer was obviously trying to distract himself by continuously interrupting Rand Paul so he wouldn't explode into full-blown episode of TDS. I could almost hear the collective reeEeeE's from over here.

Typical leftist strategy. Reminds me a lot of what happens here on ATS.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog



Where was the outrage when China and Russia hacked McCain and Obama?

All on lunch break ?



It was a mandatory diversity luncheon, okay?

You don't have to be such a cis gender reproductive organ about it!



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: 1Angrylightbulb
a reply to: Allaroundyou

What lady are you referring to?





posted on Jul, 17 2018 @ 12:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

All of you are wrong. This pick would be a VP. Try again.

Edit here.... She is young and a veteran. Two tours and not Caucasian. Too inexperienced to be a POTUS but would be a great VP. She possibly could be a POTUS but needs some serious grooming.

edit on 2/19/2013 by Allaroundyou because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 17 2018 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Allaroundyou

Why not just say who you are referring to



posted on Jul, 17 2018 @ 12:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: 1Angrylightbulb
a reply to: Allaroundyou

Why not just say who you are referring to


Fine I will tell ya. But for the record I was having fun with my crumbs.


Tulsi Gabbard



posted on Jul, 17 2018 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Allaroundyou

If she's for lower taxes, fewer regulations, smaller government, strong border security, then I may vote for her.



posted on Jul, 17 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Allaroundyou

If she's for lower taxes, fewer regulations, smaller government, strong border security, then I may vote for her.



Lower taxes yes and fewer regulations is somewhat questionable. Smaller gubment not sure as the same goes for border security. I have been reading about her a lot recently. She does seem to flip flop a lot but she is a strong VP choice. Obviously Biden is going to run. Who he would pick as a VP has to be a new face. And in order for the Democrats to get back on “the horses a##” then they need something new. Someone that has military background. A strong female that will appeal to those that oddly wanted Hillary to win. We/they need someone that can tell it how it is. She has proven that she can.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<<   2 >>

log in

join