Democratic Socialist Darling Ocasio-Cortez Demonstrating How Clueless She Is

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Nyiah

If I had a nickle every time someone touted their so called intellectual superiority.

I'd be a one percent Cortez would want to rob to give those 'in need' minus a snip load of overhead, but what's a few trillion here or there.

It has nothing to do with anything intellectually superior, bub. You seem to think the legally impossible will happen, which clearly demonstrates you don't understand the age requirement for running, nor the colossal -- and logically, impossible -- PITA it would take to change the law to ALLOW her to run in the first place. You're basically crying wolf like SJWs do.

If you're butthurt over a perceived attack on your intellect after mouthing off without thinking it through, I think it has more to do with how much you personally feel like a fool than it does with anyone actually bashing your intellect.
I can't help you with that one. Own up & move on.

a reply to: Nyiah

Nope.

www.google.com...

thehill.com...

Just two examples.

Why is the presidential age any different ?

If you're butthurt over a perceived attack on your intellect after mouthing off without thinking it through, I think it has more to do with how much you personally feel like a fool than it does with anyone actually bashing your intellect. I can't help you with that one. Own up & move on.

Put that trigger on safety, and take your own advice

Move on.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Then, in a recent interview, on PBS's "Firing Line," she mentioned that Israel are "the occupiers of Palestine," and later admitted she didn't know all the facts. "Oh, umm............................................................"

Isn't that similar to Trump's stance on Russia and Ukraine during the election? He promoted Russia's innocence while at the same time saying he didn't have all the facts.

No.

One is innocent until proven guilty. One of the foundations of our legal system.

The other is pretending to know something when you don't have enough facts to even be in the conversation.

As far as DNC candiates she is primed...A junior senator from Illinois did it with no executive experience and he never even tended bar or had a job that I know of. I want to know who is actually behind and funding her. Pushing her.

If you look at the guy that she ran against he raised the most he ever has in over a decade of campaigns. Almost 4 million and they spent in 2018 more than they brought in because of cash on hand.

Now, in contrast, she raised almost 900k as a 'nobody' and if you look at open secrets not much from PAC's to trace...only 10k in total.

She has some radial ideas but if she is elected their will be another turn in the tide. She is a very Progressive Democrat and there more than a small number now that are. It will hinder them in the elections this year.

a reply to: matafuchs

I want to know who is actually behind and funding her. Pushing her.

Clinton,Obama,DNC,Soros, and their 501c4s.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: matafuchs

I want to know who is actually behind and funding her. Pushing her.

Clinton,Obama,DNC,Soros, and their 501c4s.

she won by getting the most votes in her district on the democratic side.....but why spoil your delusion

a reply to: neo96

Not so sure. I think there are some Bernie Bros/Sis out there with some cash who are really pissed at what happened in 2016. As well as some RINO's...it was just a thought to throw out there because those you mentioned? Yeah, those monies went to the incumbent.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Russia is innocent RE: Ukraine. Intercepted telecommunications prove that Victoria Nuland and Jeff Piyati (spelling?) were actually behind the coup.

Can't blame Crimea (and the other two regions) for breaking off from their illegitimate government. I'd do the exact same thing here in the US if another country illegally engaged in "regime change" against us.

But hey, I guess those dirty leftists don't support "Democracy" after all. Right? As you'll recall, 90-something percent of Crimean citizens voted to re-join Russia.

Blaming the Ukraine coup on anyone other than its conspirators is a non-starter and a losing prospect. Facts are always good. Yet you all wonder why we don't take the left's whining/pouting about "meddling" seriously. The second you start applying these concepts equally is the second I take it seriously. Until then? I trust Russia more than the American left any day.

originally posted by: neo96
Why is the presidential age any different ?

Because it's in this thing called the Constitution.

The progressives or whatever you want to call them appear to have already reached their Tea Party Full Sarah Palin point of absurdity. And it happened rather quickly, but that isn't too surprising when you sacrifice reason for the sake of serving an ideology.

No, you are mistaken about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She knows exactly what she stands for, as do her constituents. This is the future of America, because a majority support the issues that Ocasio-Cortez espouses. That makes her mainstream, and why progressives will ultimately restore America as a democratic republic.