It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
a reply to: Lucidparadox
What you say is incorrect.
1. As an employer, I would interview all with resumes that meet or exceed the requirements.
2. Crime happens in all neighborhoods. If you do not think that is true, that is your problem. But ask yourself, if you were looking to rob a house, what neighborhood would you target?
3. It depends on how you define hair or style. I had long hair in my teenage years, the amount of times I was asked about being a stoner because of it was ridiculous. Mostly because I had never done pot.
I wear a wallet chain due to my work and it being good practice to have everything in my pockets attached to me.
Do not tell me I am not judged. I see it and I hear it.
4. I do not see what you think you see.
I'm sorry you have drank the kool-aid.
It is an oxymoronic term that actually means "black discrimination.." Because obviously a poor white person in America isn't privledged.. Why the left tends to choose to put logical fallacies right in the title of issues where imho they are in the right... I have no idea.. Well or I guess it is the short sighted view of knowing they will energize a certain percent of the population by putting "black " in the title even when it is not a black only issue.. Take black lives matter.. obviously police shootings are not a black only issue.. so good luck fixing it by only looking into black cases.. I almost think it is on purpose... so the problem persists which keeps activist groups in business.. All that said, I think right wing propaganda is meant for even dumber people.. left wing propaganda is meant to pull the heart strings.. the rights propaganda is meant to make you not care if people are inprisoned for no reason or shot by police when not a threat...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Zimnydran
So people with black sounding names no not get less than 50% of the call backs that white sounding names get???
So black people do not get more time for the same infractions in the Justice system??
So there were not communities that refused to sell or rent housing to black people??
originally posted by: xBWOMPx
a reply to: Lucidparadox
Ya know, I work with a dude, a black dude at that. His uncle owns a business in St.Louis Mo, he says not one white person works for him at all by his choice, but if a white were to do this with his company, they'd have a BIG lawsuit. Now please tell me how there was white privilege going on there. Honestly I can give two S*hits what his uncle does with his business, it is his business but again, where is there white privilege in that scenario?
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xBWOMPx
Where the hell do they do that lol??
Your just pulling that n Nonsense out of your butt..
There have only been black owned ANYTHING for the last 50 years lol..
When in American history has there EVER been a buisness who refused to serve whites??!
You literally had the whole south refuse to serve blacks less than a lifetime ago..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Zimnydran
So people with black sounding names do not get less than 50% of the call backs that white sounding names get???
So black people do not get more time for the same infractions in the Justice system??
So there were not communities that refused to sell or rent housing to black people??