It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What I'm hearing crickets on is (right,wrong,otherwise) is any addressing of the $400 million to Clinton brought forth by Putin.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Whereismypassword
Red, how the hell has a fiercely anti Russian site a few years ago like this one all of a sudden trust Russia over everyone else?
So far as I know, ATS has never been an anti-Russian site... it has always been, and still is, an anti-ignorance site.
You seem to be confusing the two.
You kidding me, how about...
the sad thing is Red Russia has won with their internet muck spreading
Trump is a blend of Jacksonian tendencies and General Douglas MacArthur's megalomania.
Strangely, Trump's theatrical gifts and sense of power weren't on display, he didn't keep Putin waiting for a hour and chat to reporters for half a hour before formally entering the summit.
Closely Guarded Secret Work
Trusted elements inside the Trump Administration (who have been sworn to absolute secrecy, even ordered to flatly DENY the very existence of this material in order to maintain security) are being tasked to sort through, analyse and catalog all activities turned over by Russia; paying particular attention to any activity which resulted in violence, death or property damage, so as to be able to criminally prosecute ALL the Conspirators based on any end-result violence or property loss/damage. Whether the Conspirators intended such acts or not, the acts themselves "were a foreseeable consequence" of their efforts, thus making them ALL guilty.
Working from the top, these trusted elements inside the Trump Administration will take each effort and follow it down to the end results, documenting any acts of state-level violence, which thereby makes ALL participants in that entire effort subject to Conspiracy charges. Conspiracy is the likely charge as opposed to bringing Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization (RICO) cases, because RICO cases require predicate felonies which often had not occurred.
I asked if any of this evidence can actually be used in court since none of it was obtained via Warrant? I was told that ALL of it is admissible because the United States did not solicit the information and had no part in it being illegally obtained! Thus, there is no "fruit of a poison tree" to block admissibility!...
I think both men are under similar attacks in their home countries, and that they both believe this coordination on investigations is the key to finally exposing the corruption surrounding them.
originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: TheRedneck
With respect I think you should learn more about Putin, the man your president seems to admire a lot