Peter Strzok is so corrupt they can not find cause to fire him?!?!?!

a reply to: IAMTAT

You mean is strzok still working for the FBI? And the answer is.. Well You know what the answer is don't you?

Hey hey...

a reply to: SgtHamsandwich

What?!?

How??

If there is evidence against ANY of these people trump demonizes on a regular basis, from hillary Clinton to whoever else..

And trump appointees run every branch of law enforcement, why don’t they go through the normal judicial system and prosecute them????

If Strok is a corrupt FBI agent that is setting trump up. Why is not being indicted?? Hell he is still an FBI agent???



The GOP has been in a vicious circle of fabricating these crazy felonious conspiracies that get their base all riled up.

Then they have gop led congressional committees investigate and find no wrong doing..

Wash rinse repeat.

Previously they have claimed the democrats were protecting people..

Now that the gop run every branch of government , law enforcement and the Supreme Court what is their excuse for not acting on the conspiracy theories they have been pushing???


There are only two options now..


Either they were lying and fabricated the conspiracies In The first place or they are in on it..


And I doubt trump is in on setting himself up. Lol

a reply to: IAMTAT

He's not working on project Ghost Story anymore either. Did he get fired from that?
He's not working on Hillary's server anymore. Did he get fired from that case?
But dig those stubborn little heels in that's ok.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

You mean is strzok still working for the FBI? And the answer is.. Well You know what the answer is don't you?

Hey hey...

Did I say "FBI"?
Let's check together...Shall we, Silly?

So Strzok is still working for the SC?
Booted...removed...fired....Semantics.

Don't be intentionally dense.
Mueller gave Strzok the boot.

NOW...
WHY did Mueller do that?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Reading comprehension lesson, completed.

a reply to: IAMTAT

He removed him from the case..


He wasn’t fired..

They do more than “remove you from the case” for attempting to set up the president.. lol



They remove you from the case when you haven’t really done anything wrong but they don’t want the appearance of inporpriety..

a reply to: IAMTAT

BWAHAHAHA..

Lesson ?!?!

Oh man...


You say he was fired.. you were wrong..

Lesson completed..


Lol

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IAMTAT

He removed him from the case..


He wasn’t fired..

They do more than “remove you from the case” for attempting to set up the president.. lol



They remove you from the case when you haven’t really done anything wrong but they don’t want the appearance of inporpriety..

SO, if I was removed from my job involuntarily, I wasnt fired?

you live in a strange place, man

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: The GUT

Coney fired: might mean obstruction..


Manafort: sitting in jail..

Flynn: disgraced, charged and plead guilty..


So there is evidence against stroke and they can’t even get him fired?!?!

And trump appointees are his boss?!?!

Oh stop it with the nonsense you Koolaid drinking hypocrite. You know very well that none of those indictments have anything to do with collusion. Only the 12 Russians have been indicted with "interference": see social media posting... Do you really not see the issue with Mueller presented these indictments just before the summit with Russia? Do you really think it all just happens to work out that way? Its all a political drama and showbiz to be consumed by the unthinking masses...like someone you know personally.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IAMTAT

They remove you from the case when you haven’t really done anything wrong but they don’t want the appearance of inporpriety..

Says the expert on FBI procedure and resident spelling bee champion.

a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

Actually what matters is if you still get a pay check lol..


But even that is too far..

He was just transferred off a case..

That’s it..


He is still an FBI agent..

He still has his gun and badge..

He still gets a check..

So please explain how I’m the one in fantasy land ??

Lol

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IAMTAT

They remove you from the case when you haven’t really done anything wrong but they don’t want the appearance of inporpriety..

Says the expert on FBI procedure and resident spelling bee champion.

BWAHAHAHA

HOmie is spell checking!!

Lol

www.washingtonpost.com... ains-a-bureau-employee/2018/06/19/706a8b8c-73ff-11e8-805c-4b67019fcfe4_story.html?utm_term=.5e61bfffe796

"The FBI agent who was removed from the special counsel investigation for sending anti-Trump texts was escorted from the FBI building Friday and effectively relieved of work responsibilities — though he technically remains an FBI agent, his lawyer said.

Peter Strzok already had been reassigned to the FBI’s Human Resources Division after he was taken off special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team, though the move last week effectively took him off even that assignment. The move put Strzok on notice that the bureau intends to fire him, though he has rights to appeal that are likely to delay that action."

June 19, 2018



I notice link not working, I don't know why. Washington Post article titled: FBI agent who said ‘we’ll stop’ Trump from becoming president escorted from building, though he remains a bureau employee

a reply to: timequake

What do you mean?!?!

The left’s narrative....


Trump colluded with Russian agents to release dirt on hillary Clinton on the eve of the campaign..

Flynn plead guilty for lying to the fbi about Russian collusion..


All the Russian citizens were indicted for hacking the DNC...


Manafort for laundering Russian money..

And as for collusion with trump himself..

Good morning Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin. What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly? I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first. Best Rob Goldstone

Released by trump jr himself..

a reply to: Onlyyouknow

So they didn’t have enough evidence to fire him...

Or why isn’t he fired...


But more than that they are not accusing him of just doing things that could get you fired..

They are accusing him of felonies..

Trying to set up the president since he is an FBI official is a felony..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IAMTAT

They remove you from the case when you haven’t really done anything wrong but they don’t want the appearance of inporpriety..

Says the expert on FBI procedure and resident spelling bee champion.

BWAHAHAHA

HOmie is spell checking!!

Lol

I don't recall the last thread I've read where you didn't either make up a word or use one incorrectly. Look up malapropism.

You do realize every modern device has a spell check right? Do you think sounding ignorant helps your case?

ETA I didn't have to check the spelling nor would anybody with an effective education in high school. Your assinine speculation often uses words or fails to spell correctly words most people learned in middle school. In the past 24 hours you said preform instead of perform. That's just in the last 24 hours. Now define inporpriety for me.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Your assinine speculation often uses words or fails to spell correctly words most people learned in middle school. In the past 24 hours you said preform instead of perform. That's just in the last 24 hours. Now define inporpriety for me.

Lol, friendly heads up, maybe should edit this asap.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Lumenari

Nothing? Nothing? They just indicted eleven more people today!

Keep up sweetheart.

They indicted eleven people that have nothing remotely to do with Trump.

They could indict the entire population of Russia and it still would not prove collusion.

Everything everyone has found so far concludes that if the Russians even did attempt to sway the election (as we do all the time in other countries) that their efforts did not, in fact, have any impact on it.

That's according to Obama... the guy that was in charge of our elections at the time they were held.

I am assuming you have better knowledge of it?

LOL

originally posted by: Osirisvset

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Your assinine speculation often uses words or fails to spell correctly words most people learned in middle school. In the past 24 hours you said preform instead of perform. That's just in the last 24 hours. Now define inporpriety for me.

Lol, friendly heads up, maybe should edit this asap.

What would you care to see me edit? The word that the original poster didn't spell
correctly? That was the whole point. Did you miss the whole point? Imporpriety is not a word.The op makes a point of making posts that prepose (note that's an actual word) he's smarter than everyone else.

Don't try to ridicule me based on the ridiculous text used by others.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: Osirisvset

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Your assinine speculation often uses words or fails to spell correctly words most people learned in middle school. In the past 24 hours you said preform instead of perform. That's just in the last 24 hours. Now define inporpriety for me.

Lol, friendly heads up, maybe should edit this asap.

What would you care to see me edit? The word that the original poster didn't spell
correctly? That was the whole point. Did you miss the whole point? Imporpriety is not a word.The op makes a point of making posts that prepose (note that's an actual word) he's smarter than everyone else.

Don't try to ridicule me based on the ridiculous text used by others.

Well seeing as you asked so nicely, asinine only has one s.
And "prepose"? Yes its a word but it makes absolutely no sense in the context you used it.
I couldn't care less generally but you made such a big deal about it I thought I'd join the fun(my bad).

Btw, apologies, I didn't get your point with the impropriety/imporpiety thing(still dont to be honest), flew way over my head!
Sincerely though, I should've kept my thoughts to myself as I don't think conflict and snarling at one another serves any purpose other than furthering the agenda of the creeps, so I am sorry that you felt ridiculed and it won't happen again.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: timequake

What do you mean?!?!

The left’s narrative....


Trump colluded with Russian agents to release dirt on hillary Clinton on the eve of the campaign..

Flynn plead guilty for lying to the fbi about Russian collusion..


All the Russian citizens were indicted for hacking the DNC...


Manafort for laundering Russian money..

And as for collusion with trump himself..

Good morning Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin. What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly? I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first. Best Rob Goldstone

Released by trump jr himself..

Okay... just put the koolaid down a second and pay attention to details:

There is no evidence that has been presented that shows Trump colluding with Russians on election interference. Zero. Yet you stated it like it a proven fact. Why?

Flynn didn't "lie about Russian collusion". He misstated about meeting someone... something that went nowhere. His current indictment was only procedural. Even after the truth came out, it still demonstrated no collusion. All of his current charges relate to personal fraud issues, and not "Russians"

The Russians were indicted on a number of issues, that now also include "hacking" despite no evidence. In fact, the only lead show that's the download speed was too fast to have been done remotely indicating that it was done by someone on the inside... someone that would likely had to have worked for the DNC.

So stop making stuff up. Stop drinking the Koolaid. Don't let yourself be so easily manipulated but the conspiracy theories.