Peter Strzok is so corrupt they can not find cause to fire him?!?!?!

a reply to: stosh64

I’d doesn’t matter what democrats are there..,


Trump appointees are his boss and the gop owns every branch of government, law enforcement and the Supreme Court..

So please explain to me how a democrat can protect him??

Lol

It is Propaganda meant for stupid people ..

One assumption here you have is that the justice system at that level is working or undefiled.
a reply to: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yea because one side is pretending the other is a super villian... now people have given that side control of every branch of government to hold those super villains accountable..

So what gives??

THat's what both sides have been doing as long as I've had memory of such thing. Its the name of the game. They're shooting suckers out of everyones televisions and two party people just suck them up. You knw, you know how many licks it takes to get to the center of the.... Oh wait, there's no such things as a center in your reality I'm afraid.

a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

I’m assuming that the people running the DOJ are all trump appointees..

They absolutely have the authority..


The only logical conclusion is that they have zero evidence to back up their claims..

If they had it, they would use it..

That means all this “I’ve been set up “ stuff is a lie..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

I’m assuming that the people running the DOJ are all trump appointees..

They absolutely have the authority..


The only logical conclusion is that they have zero evidence to back up their claims..

If they had it, they would use it..

That means all this “I’ve been set up “ stuff is a lie..

If only our JUST US system worked the same for THEM! Guess you still have some waking up to do stepford wife?

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

I’m assuming that the people running the DOJ are all trump appointees..

They absolutely have the authority..


The only logical conclusion is that they have zero evidence to back up their claims..

If they had it, they would use it..

That means all this “I’ve been set up “ stuff is a lie..

It’s a reasonable argument. The truth is, I don’t trust either side in this dog and pony show. So if I don’t trust establishment republicans either, there are still questions.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Trump making a deal with Russian agents to help discredit his political opponents doesn’t take a supervillian..

Bush starting a war in Iraq then giving the military billion dollar rebuild contract to his own private company doesn’t take a supervillian..


Just an amoral buisnessman would do just fine..


Hillary committing murders and running elite pedophile rings takes a supervillian..

Obama being a Kenyan Muslim socialist trying to destroy his own country takes a supervillian..


All the media, scientists, college professors, unions, celebrities, ect.. all being in a vast conspiracy to discredit conservatives takes a supervillian..

It’s professional wrestling ..

I think I’m seeing a psychotic break in real time while reading through this thread...

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IAMTAT

He wasn’t fired..

So Strzok is still working for the SC?
Booted...removed...fired....Semantics.

Don't be intentionally dense.
Mueller gave Strzok the boot.

NOW...
WHY did Mueller do that?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What cause did Mueller use to FIRE him?

Apparently; The "Look" of bias, not that there was any.

Verbal gymnastics like no one has been before

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I get the point you're trying to make, but your coming off as supporting some of the things the left say they hate Trump for.

You're advocating for a Trump dictatorship.

You're advocating bypassing due process in favor of mob rule.

Evidence of bias was found and he was removed from the Mueller probe. We are currently in the throws of the due process so hold your horses buddy, I don't think this thread will age well.

a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

But the sides are not equal..

On the left:

they have made the claim that trump is corrupt and made a backroom deal with Russian agents..

Outcome so far:

Trump’s campaign is under fbi investigation..

Trump’s campaign chairman Paul Manafort is in jail..

Trump national security adviser plead guilty

There have been a couple dozen indictments of Russians..

On the right:

They claim hillary is corrupt and should be in jail..

Conclusion: even trump’s own IG said she should never have been charged with a crime...

He claims Peter Stok set him up..

Conclusion:

Trump’s own IG said there was no evidence of that and he is still a working FBI agent..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Trump making a deal with Russian agents to help discredit his political opponents doesn’t take a supervillian..

Bush starting a war in Iraq then giving the military billion dollar rebuild contract to his own private company doesn’t take a supervillian..


Just an amoral buisnessman would do just fine..


Hillary committing murders and running elite pedophile rings takes a supervillian..

Obama being a Kenyan Muslim socialist trying to destroy his own country takes a supervillian..


All the media, scientists, college professors, unions, celebrities, ect.. all being in a vast conspiracy to discredit conservatives takes a supervillian..

It’s professional wrestling ..

Actually, Bush and co lying to invade a country, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians, and giving contracts to cronies, is supervillanous. And torture. War crimes. It’s also literally a conspiracy. If that’s true why can’t you believe that some liberal might do horrid things?

The thing is, a fallacy you have and I used to have was that only right wingers did such things. It’s a classical illogical view, that because you and I as liberals wouldn’t do it, and are honest, therefore liberal leaders wouldn’t. Obama and clinton with NATO overthrew Libya, and tried to overthrow Assad in Syria via funding, arming, and training rebel and foreign fighters. Lots of people died bro. People still are and it’s a country in chaoss

If all that’s true, I don’t think some of these people are beyond a few murders or corruption at home.

a reply to: SgtHamsandwich

That's precisely what he wants, he wants the dictatorship. That way everything he's feeling and everything he's absorbed will be validated. The Trump administration rules with an iron fist "HAH I WAS RIGHT!", the Trump administration does not rule with an iron fist "THEY CONTROL EVERYTHING, WHY HAVEN'T THEY DONE ANYTHING WITH IT?!?!"

There's really no reasoning with it at all...

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Lol they're still investigating.

It depends on the topic. I personally like the left because I’m an environmentalist and work on anti poverty work. To that end, I believe in investing in education and health care for all.

However, as Glenn Greenwald and Chomsky say both parties become the Uniparty of war. That much is hard to deny if you know history. Further, both absolutely are in the pocket of major corporations and other powerful interests. Their policies often demonstrate that on both sides. This is corruption as large as it gets.

If you don’t know clinton is complicit in that, I can’t help you.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

a reply to: Lumenari

Nothing? Nothing? They just indicted eleven more people today!

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Oh don't bother. I tried to make him understand. He's glued to Mueller fired him.
He doesn't understand that it was the FBI when he was on Mueller s team and it's still the FBI in HR. So don't waste your time.

Smith-Mundt reformation act...why would Obama have repealed it, if they did not intend to run psy-ops?... It has been a one party system since Reagan. They are polarizing the citizens...blue on black did not work? But it looks like dem v pub might...if not, on to the next show.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Here is the way I look at this fiasco train wreck of an agent. First off, his FORMER title was Deputy Chief of Counter Intelligence.

This Agent held a Top Secret clearance and worked on some very high profile cases, many that I am sure we will never know of. By all accounts he is a Top investigator known for his knowledge and experience and called on to take advantage of that experience.

This Agent complained and was outraged that Republicans questioned his integrity. What integrity ? This Agent lost ALL credibility when he engaged in an extramarital affair.

Personal life, I don't really care however most professionals realize the absolute folly in regular inter-office romances but an illicit one ? Both of these Agents involved romantically worked on the same cases, and obviously communicated about that work.

This Agent, opened himself up to blackmail, not only from outside sources, oh I don't know CAN YOU SAY RUSSIA ! BUT also other sources within the government and others he investigated. As an Agent with his hands on counter intell investigations he was and is ripe for the picking.

Inter office romance also opens not only the individuals involved to lawsuits of sexual harassment suits when one or the other gets mad, but also to those around them that feel favoritism being displayed. This type of suit happens everyday.

This Agent needs and will be fired once the OPM finishes their reading of the next IG report on the Russian investigation comes out. He deserves to be fired for the poor judgement he has displayed in the adultery and unprofessional behavior.

The FBI denies individuals everyday security clearances for a lot less than adulterous affairs and if no one is above the law then he should be let go. The partisanship displayed from both sides is disgusting.

Anyone defending this Agent needs to realize he could have been and maybe was, as we will never know blackmailed in either direction and he alone placed himself in that position and he alone should deal with it and resign.