TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Thanks, Lady Tigrrr.

Useful and interesting compilation:

EVERY TripCode & UserID used by Q Points to a Book

rooak.com...

This may take an hour or two to unwind, lol.

REL!

NOTE that Q Post #1768 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub is a MARKER post, coming ZERO minutes after #1767.

This means that it's IMPORTANT in relation to Action in Progress!

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: pheonix358

What are the differences between a ballistic missile and a cruise missile?

From your source no less

Warhead itself is a mass destruction. Both missiles can be very accurate for their Specific purpose.

We are talking of an atomic missile ... and yes, they are accurate ... with multiple war heads.

P

a reply to: CoramDeo

I suggest we take 2 or 3 examples of the first time a Q Trip code is used:

1) Take the book Lady Tigrrr has identified with that Tripcode,
2) Turn to the Chapter identified from the HOURS of the Timestamp in that first use,
3) Turn to the page, within the Chapter, from the MINUTES of the Timestamp in that first use,
4) Look at the line on that page indicated by the SECONDS of the Timestamp in that first use,
5) See if it has any relevance to the Q Posts at that time.
6) If not, look at the time delta with previous Q post (in s/sht) and use the MINUTES of the Delta to select the START word on the line... and the SECONDS of the delta to decide how many WORDS in the message.

Rinse and repeat for first use of a few UserIDs.

I will not be reading 1,111 books between DECODES!

originally posted by: pheonix358
We are talking of an atomic missile ... and yes, they are accurate ... with multiple war heads.

Yeah, for their specific purpose and Q said:
"POTUS AF1.
POTUS re-routes."

I see no mention of an atomic payload.

a reply to: daskakik

What? Do you think they change out the warhead as required ... on a sub?

May explain the emergency message in Hawaii.

We will not figure this out until more information is forthcoming, probably in someones trial.

P

a reply to: LilBlkSambo

so they select the biggest rightist-extremist and troll chan board...

a reply to: CoramDeo

Just tried it on current Tripcode CbboFOtcZs which gives book:

"Ramtha, Last Waltz of the Tyrants, the Prophecy REVISITED"

The Tripcode was first used in Q Post #1417 (qntmpkts.keybase.pub).
That post has a Timestamp of May 19th 2018 17:07:06 (Delta from last post=00:00:46).

The book has only 9 Chapters +Forward, Epilogue etc. Therefore can't use 17 as the Chapter number; but 17:00 is 5pm so let's say Chapter 5.

Chapter 5 Title is "Earth and the Fight for Survival" (rough quote). It starts at page 67, so add 7 mins we get page 73.

Try to look at page 73... not available on Google preview.

From the latest Q post ( #1771 )

ARTICLES ABOUT Q

WHY DO THEY NEVER ASK THE ANONS WHY THEY ARE HERE?

REAL ANON'S are here as we follow the EVIDENCE (documented verifiable evidence), we are building the TRUTH of our HISTORY so we can expose and dismantle the corruption that has PLAGUED our world for millennia.

I invite any publication to print this as a statement of fact from an ACTUAL ANON.

WE do not tell YOU what to think or how to FEEL about a topic. WE simply dig for TRUTH and then PRESENT what we find so it can be scrutinized by our PEERS and further corroborated.

The CHOICE to KNOW what we have found, verified and presented is entirely up to YOU.

Presenting OUR work in a way to imply WE are some sort of cult, shows the WORLD how corrupt the MAINSTREAM MEDIA has become.

WE are NOT about violence, subversion or control. WE are simply providing FACT based information FREE of charge to the WORLD.

WWG1WGA

Feel FREE to SHARE

To which Q added:


qanon.pub...

This anon is accurate in pointing out the weakness all these MSM QAnon slander articles... they never interview an actual Q supporter.
It's things like that that are the crux of this movement. The fact that they can only tell you WHAT to think rather than give you the respect to form your own conclusions. In other words...

a reply to: pheonix358

Well, we were talking about the CT going around that they were gunning for AF1. It wasn't in the area and a ballistic missile on a moving target of that size at that range is not its specific purpose so it is still unlikely.

Hawaii? I would think that they would have shot for it outside the US ADIZ.

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

"documented verifiable evidence"


where?

a reply to: XAnarchistX

hey.
some evidence!

THANKS Q!

PUT THESE PEDOS AWAY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, June 18, 2018
Joshua Adam Schulte Charged With The Unauthorized Disclosure Of Classified Information And Other Offenses Relating To The Theft Of Classified Material From The Central Intelligence Agency
Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General for National Security, and William F. Sweeney Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced today that JOSHUA ADAM SCHULTE was charged in a 13-count Superseding Indictment (the “Indictment”) in connection with his alleged theft of classified national defense information from the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) and the transmission of that material to an organization that purports to publicly disseminate classified, sensitive, and confidential information (“Organization-1”). The Indictment also charges SCHULTE with the receipt, possession, and transportation of child pornography, as well as criminal copyright infringement. SCHULTE, who is presently detained on the child pornography charges, will be arraigned by U.S. District Judge Paul A. Crotty.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said: “Joshua Schulte, a former employee of the CIA, allegedly used his access at the agency to transmit classified material to an outside organization. During the course of this investigation, federal agents also discovered alleged child pornography in Schulte’s New York City residence.

hey, i think this is the VAULT 7 wiki leaker

originally posted by: DiggerPI

I think someone in Hollywood said that Tom Hanks "loves" children. It wasn't Q.

Sarah Ruth Ashcraft was vocal about her feeling towards Mr Hanks.

And did you notice in the article that they never gave a quote or a tweet pic of Sarah Ashcroft's words? Why don't they want you to know what she said?

In fact, it would've been far more thorough of an article had they actually interview Sara herself. She's a survivor of child abuse and ritual sexual abuse and she aims to share her experiences to educate. All of which are very relevant to Q.

They just wanted the #Qanon hashtag.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

If she's telling the truth, her father rented her out to him.

a reply to: TomLawless

Nice.

I wonder if the child porn was his own stash or if it was part of the info he is alleged to have stolen.

Perhaps a copy of someones laptop?

Does point out rather well that comms on cell phones is never secure.

P

a reply to: pheonix358

i think this guy is the Wikileaks Vault 7 Leaker

Ok, let's put this to sleep.

A long range anti-air missile relies on a network of radar stations, which are unlikely to be available to a rogue force.

An IR based system needs to lock on, which means within visual range.

It looks like a pretty big bird on top of that missile plume, and it's trajectory is ballistic. It's hypersonic re entry is not suited to hitting a moving target for a number of reasons.... including a blocking effect of the plasma shroud during terminal re entry phase. Simply it's not possible to get target data updated to the warhead reliably within the ion cloud, like an EMP, a "blackout".

Te best way to shoot a plane down is to come in from behind at a closing speed that allows it to track along with any manuovers of the target. This launch was something completely different. Mark my words.

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

If she's telling the truth, her father rented her out to him.

Yes I've followed her testimonials. She came from an incredibly messed up family. Beyond dysfunctional. Purely evil.

I believe her sincerity. And there are others from similar backgrounds whose stories corroborate with hers in very specific ( and downright sinister ) ways.

originally posted by: dashen
hey.
some evidence!

THANKS Q!

The MSM is equating all things pedo related to Q. Which is of course absurd.