TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

Avenatti with "teammate" Saudi Prince Abdulaziz bin Turki Al Saud.


...SON of former Saudi head of intelligence (until 9/11)

Turki bin Faisal Al Saud:

From 1977 to 2001, Prince Turki was the director general of Al Mukhabarat Al 'Ammah, Saudi Arabia's intelligence agency, resigning the position on 1 September 2001, some ten days before the September 11 attacks in which 14 Saudi nationals hijacked commercial American airliners.

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: Aallanon
Good news (sarc)

I don't think the old girl has 5 more in her.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Plans to Stay on Supreme Court for At Least Five More Years

Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg has no intentions of retiring any time soon. At the age of 85, she said on Sunday she hopes to have another five years on the bench, at the least.

www.mediaite.com...

Looking at recent pics of Ginsburg, I'm not sure the old girl will live to see another Hanukkah. 5 more years is almost certainly wishful thinking.

NEW Q #1762 just Up:
qanon.pub...

a reply to: Whereismypassword

If that were true, he'd have been charged with a crime and he could never have become President of the United States.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Hmmm. Interesting.

I know CALPERS is in serious trouble ive been keeping tabs on the incoming pension tsunami.

My theory is that thats what most of the taxes and government debt is covering

a reply to: IAMTAT

Ha ha ha.
The sissy boy got beat up by a girl. That's funny.
You have no idea what was behind that but make up what ever your little mind can come up with.
But funny enough that doesn't address what I said in the least.
And since you brought it up...
I'm sure Donald had a real good reason for pulling his wife's hair out by the roots too.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Aallanon
Good news (sarc)

I don't think the old girl has 5 more in her.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Plans to Stay on Supreme Court for At Least Five More Years

Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg has no intentions of retiring any time soon. At the age of 85, she said on Sunday she hopes to have another five years on the bench, at the least.

www.mediaite.com...

Looking at recent pics of Ginsburg, I'm not sure the old girl will live to see another Hanukkah. 5 more years is almost certainly wishful thinking.

IDK...Ruthie looks pretty spry.

a reply to: TomLawless

Who's a prostitute? And what's wrong with that? It's not like guys don't patronize them you know...
Damn the women but not their customers... Priceless.
But anyway an adult film actress is not a prostitute.
The only one buying the sex is the person who buys the movies.

a reply to: Mike Stivic

You do make a valid point but, come on, can't we have a little fun around here? Besides, it is peripherally related to Q's drop with regard to Stormy's "creepy porn lawyer", Michael Avenatti. Nonetheless, I think that topic has been exhausted and, before we get too distracted by Stormy with our sidebar conversations, we can probably move on to something else, unless someone has something new to say about it.

That Avantti tweet is getting hammered by Q'sters. Haha

a reply to: IAMTAT

She's praying.. Or pleading, I can't really tell.

a reply to: TomLawless

Oh and trump sure is acting ashamed while she is not. Says a lot.
Wonder how his non existent marriage where they have separate rooms is going?

The scandal is that he's lying ...again...And a misuse of campaign funds.
No body cares who he #s. I'm sure it's nothing.

I've been thinking about MSM's projected downfall and what would rise from the ashes. This is most clearly stated in Q post #932 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub:


News started in Europe in 1605 in Strassburg (Wiki) and developed to weekly pamphlets.

At the beginning of the 17th century, the right to print was strictly controlled in England. This was probably the reason why the first newspaper in the English language was printed in Rome by Joris Veseler around 1620.

So... early control of what the public gets to know!

In America, it started a century later (US Wiki):

The history of American newspapers begins in the early 18th century with the publication of the first colonial newspapers. American newspapers began as modest affairs—a sideline for printers. They became a political force in the campaign for American independence.

My understanding is that newspapers started/proliferated within communities but over time were brought together into conglomerates. Whilst the public perception was that conglomeration was required to make journalism and distribution more economical, for the cabal it was the route to regaining control of the message and enabled control of who was enlightened and who was kept in the dark.

In the future, with all the power of the internet, the only driver to reduce cost would be with any remaining cabal to reduce the cost of their retaining control.

Should we return to small independent news within communities, though now distributed through online communities?

Would we need regulation to severely limit the number of "news outlets" one entity can control?

Would we need professional journalists? One may argue that standards drop without them but... with vastly improved Libel Laws standards would have to be maintained? Would we need them for fact gathering? Looking at our combined abilities through the Great Awakening, I'd argue NO!

Is it possible that We The People are being trained to replace MSM?

Just the ramblings of an inquisitive truth seeker.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I don't normally agree with you, but I'm agreeing with you on this one 100%.

a reply to: carewemust

No discipline? Personally, I come here to relax from a job that requires me to be extremely disciplined or risk dying. Sheesh. What are you, a prison guard or something? No wait, that's me. Anyway, can't research be fun?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

MSM projected downfall?
Now you guys have really bitten the fantasy weenie.
Like that is ever going to happen.
This isn't 1930s Germany you know.

1762

What happens when CA is in serious debt and lost priority aid from the FED gov due to sanctuary status (illegal)?
Light fires.
Declare State of Emergency and req billions from FED.
Why did POTUS reject in the past?
Sick people!
The more you know.
www.washingtonpost.com... 9c2e-215c-11e8-94da-ebf9d112159c_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a09a30d0059a📁
www.forbes.com...📁
www.latimes.com...📁
Q

Whoa! Q is claiming the recent spate of wildfires was deliberately set in order to ask for emergency aid.

1763 is covering more sex abuse, by the church and elsewhere.

a reply to: BotheLumberJack

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Lol

a reply to: dashen

Check your PMs.

originally posted by: BotheLumberJack
a reply to: IAMTAT

She's praying.. Or pleading, I can't really tell.

Pleading.
...with the Grim Reaper.